(May 25, 2022 at 10:46 am)Angrboda Wrote:(May 25, 2022 at 10:31 am)brewer Wrote: If you base your personal 'perception' as evidence that's ok with me (many schizophrenics consider that evidence). But I require more. If not testable it's needs to be reliably repeatable, and by validated by third parties with something more than testimony or anecdote/story.
I need something more to believe in the concept of god existing in reality.
That's not the point. Intersubjective validity exists for said perception. How are your perceptions testable and sensus divinatis not?
You believe you're seeing an apple. They believe they're seeing God. Neither can be tested without resorting to circular logic.
Independent third person(s). Stops the circle.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.