(October 16, 2014 at 9:44 am)pocaracas Wrote: uh?
You're basing your whole argument on "likely"??
(October 16, 2014 at 9:07 am)Riketto Wrote: What this study didn't tell you is the fact that under that city it is likely that there is an other city even older.
You can't really go wrong.
Asia, Europe have a long history of evolved civilization.
Under most of the cities in these places have found remains of previous civilization.
The chances that under the actual Varanasi there is nothing are remote or nil but maybe there can be a chance outside 99.99% of the probabilities that is why i said likely.