Quick Poll - Do you believe in God?

[genkaus]

According to the history Varanasi is the city of Shiva and both Hindu and Buddhist believe so whether you like it or not.
I do agree that there are many Hindu and Buddhists that this fact it is not a priority in their life as it wouldn't be a priority for a Christian to know whether Jesus lived here or there but again if you talk to most Hindus or Buddhist they know.

All of this is to say that many Hindus and Buddhists hold no opinion about the age of Varanasi - which is what you are trying to establish here. That they believe Varanasi to be a city of Shiva is irrelevant unless you simultaneously establish their beliefs about the period of Shiva's supposed existence. And even then, all you'd be able to say is that Hindus believe the city to be 7000 years old - that does not establish the actual age of the city.

What places?
And what artifacts?
Do they related to who?

Mohenjo Daro.
Seated and standing figures, copper and stone tools, carved seals, balance-scales and weights, gold and jasper jewellery, and children's toys
The last sentence does not make any sense.

How would you know that these mud bricks related to 4500 years ago or were made long after?
Again you turn ??? into certainties.

Because they've been dated to that period and that dating is consistent with all the other things discovered which give a clear idea about its period of occupation.

You can dismiss anything in your fantasy but in reality the temple is still there and the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) officials by using carbon dating confirm that it is 7000 years old and is dedicated to Shiva so all your denial came to an abrupt end.

That is a LIE. A bare-faced, sloppy LIE. The ASI website has detailed records of its excavations and undertakings and there is not a single mentions of that particular temple - let alone any mention of it being 7000 years old.

This is where you either put up or shut up. Either provide the study issued by the ASI dating the temple or stop lying through your teeth.

By the way if you don't like this blog just go on your search engine and write.............the underground temple of Malleswaram.
You will find countless reports about this temple.

That's the first thing I did after your first mention of the temple - you know what I found? A whole bunch of bullshit. Similar to your claims here - a bunch of hyper-imaginative media and bloggers claiming that the temple was 7000 years old and all without a shred of proof. Meanwhile, all the actual archeologists are not saying anything.