(March 28, 2015 at 9:48 pm)Tonus Wrote: Now that's an interesting approach. "If I just say that I believe, I don't have to prove what I say." In a way, that is religion in a nutshell.
You guys don't even prove anything after you state something.
To state means to give a validity to the confirmation that what you say is true.
On the other hand the believe relate to a personal point of view.
Why do i give a personal point of view and not a validation about what i do believe?
Suppose i say that man is not omnivore because it doesn't have the claws to knock down a pray.
You may say that humans in the beginning had big claws but as the time passes they lost their claws
nevertheless he born with the claws so he is omnivore.
In this way the argument can go on and on for ever and everybody keep their point of view.
The same apply with God.
I say what make sense to me and you say the contrary so everybody keep his believe or not believe.
I don't think that in this universe there is a single thing that can be prove without any doubt.
How it is possible considering that what is true today will be discarded in the rubbish bin of history tomorrow?
Even the evidence that God exist can only be found within and i found it but physical evidence is not possible
as God is not a physical entity so to speak that is why i can not
state that God exist in a way that you can understand.