RE: Quick Poll - Do you believe in God?
May 4, 2015 at 8:45 am
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2015 at 8:51 am by Little Rik.)
(May 3, 2015 at 11:32 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(May 3, 2015 at 8:20 am)Riketto Wrote: Sorry but your analysis doesn't take in consideration a simple fact.
Suppose i want to succeed in something but after a while i just give up because
i find the road to success too hard and then i tell you that that thing that i try to
succeed is not good.
It wasn't an analysis. It was pointing out that your constant complaint that atheists don't 'understand' anything beyond the physical-mental is wrong.
I am not talking about atheists that are not interested in knowing whether God exist or not.
I am talking about atheists that pretend to know big when in fact they don't even know the small.
They think that the consciousness is a product of the brain.
How can the matter be superior to something much more powerful as the consciousness?
It would be like to believe that the driver is a product of the car.
Just laughing.
Quote:But leave it to you to change the subject. You're projecting on other people the reason they came to the conclusions they did is the same. You don't know why these people ended their path. You have no basis for claiming the reasons are as you describe, and you didn't respond to the question of those who are on different paths but equally sincere. But then I didn't actually expect you to have an answer. You're answer doesn't cover all cases and is just an apologetic.
Actually the path to human emancipation are many but by taking the path full of spines and danger it is likely that most of the people will give up before they reach the goal of life
that is why it is very important to follow the path of those who have already reach the goal.
(May 3, 2015 at 9:41 am)Tonus Wrote:Riketto Wrote:It is true that it is undetectable but undetectable by physical science only.Then it is undetectable, period. Any other "science" you allude to cannot produce what its adherents claim it is or does. And since its adherents can't even agree on how to interpret such sciences --and often make conflicting and irreconcilable claims regarding them-- you have nothing to offer that can be verified by anyone. That isn't science.
If i can understand what you try to say (very intellectual indeed) you say that other people that also follow my path may not agree with me?
This is something new to me Ton.
In fact it is the opposite.