(May 4, 2015 at 8:45 am)Riketto Wrote:I am saying that they can't verify the results. Neither can you. They can say they followed your path and got A, and you can say you got B, and neither of you can prove that the other is wrong. Then another person can say that you got those results because of demons misleading you, and state that their path is the only true one. But they are in the exact same boat as you are. They can assert things all day long but they can't submit a single claim to scrutiny.(May 3, 2015 at 9:41 am)Tonus Wrote: Then it is undetectable, period. Any other "science" you allude to cannot produce what its adherents claim it is or does. And since its adherents can't even agree on how to interpret such sciences --and often make conflicting and irreconcilable claims regarding them-- you have nothing to offer that can be verified by anyone. That isn't science.
If i can understand what you try to say (very intellectual indeed) you say that other people that also follow my path may not agree with me?
This is something new to me Ton.
In fact it is the opposite.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould