(May 18, 2015 at 11:04 am)Tonus Wrote:(May 18, 2015 at 10:41 am)Little Rik Wrote: Sorry Ton but you are wrong once again when you say.......which leave absolutely no trace.What you are saying is "it does leave a trace, but only I can see it-- trust me!" That is so useless as to be no trace at all. And once again, you are going back to the idea that god won't show himself unless I 'let' him. A god like that is equally useless. And on top of that you go right back to the idea that you will only find this evidence if you first convince yourself it's there. Doesn't any of this leave you at least a bit suspicious about the qualities of this god, or spirit, or "science"? That the only way to interact with any of them is to pretend that they exist?
It certainly leave more that a trace but only in the consciousness of those who practice this science.
Sorry Ton but you are wrong again.
Have you ever seen representation of saints with the aureola on the top of the head?
What you think it means?
Do you know what the aura is?
http://www.anandaclaritymagazine.com/200...magnetism/
http://www.summitlighthouse.org/inner-pe...f-a-saint/
http://mysticson.blogspot.com.au/2007/06...aints.html
Auras are real phenomena which can be perceived by sentient people.
God is pure consciousness and this pure consciousness is achievable by anybody who wish.
By reducing the radius that separate your consciousness from God consciousness your
consciousness become similar to God consciousness until there is not any difference and
you are God.
Like a drop of water that merge in the big ocean will become the ocean itself and the vibrations
that form the aureola are pure bright light so if you are a sentient person you can see this light emanating from
more sentient people like the saints.
It is a lot easier to see a dark light emanating from bad people than the aura from a saints if we are not
sentient ourselves so no wonder that most people can only see the dark side of the aura as most people are not sentient themselves.