(May 29, 2015 at 11:49 am)Little Rik Wrote:You really don't understand the genetic fallacy, do you?(May 29, 2015 at 11:23 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(May 29, 2015 at 11:07 am)Little Rik Wrote: Sentient come from Latin while sattvik come from the old sanskrit language but both of them mean the same thing.
Sentient is what is good for you therefore creating progress.
It can be food, people that are good and therefore help you in your progress, way of practicing something that also help you in your progress.
A lot of English language come from Latin, a lot of Latin come from Greek, a lot of Greek come from other languages like Persian and Sanskrit
so if you are really serious about the meaning of words you should go back and back until you find the origin of the words but i doubt that you will do
that.
This is an example of the genetic fallacy and as such is an example of "wrong thought". Words evolve and change through time. Insisting that a word be equivalent to its meaning from a bygone time is an error.
Ah,ah,ah.
Just as i just said in my post to Ton.
Religious people changes so much the meaning that was given by the spiritual beings that the original meaning has been totally lost and now they are chasing dreams and dogmas.
Highly spiritual beings like Christ, Buddha, Shiva and khrisna just to named few never intended to create religions but those who follow slowly slowly turned the original meaning into something else.
You follow the same demented path into agree that the original meaning once changed make sense.
You should really organize a party with religious people and hug each other after all you got so many thing in common.
That's okay, now you've switched to a new fallacy. The appeal to tradition fallacy.
How do you know that it was originally good and is no longer good?