(May 30, 2015 at 8:25 am)Little Rik Wrote: The link that i provided was to show you that the words Sattvik and Sentient go so often hand in hand in so many sites and in so many people minds which boil down to the fact that so many people know that there is no differences among the two.As I explained, they are simply using the term in a non-literal manner. If they're going to do that, they're going to engender misunderstandings.
Little Rik Wrote:Veganism is good in general (without garlic, onion and mushroom however) but to be able to see auras you need a lot more.Translation: whatever those people did, it wasn't enough. Like I said, creative excuse-making, though I apparently overestimated your creativity. Like every other faith that claims that you can see changes if you follow a script, the script changes whenever an exception arises. In other words, auras can only be seen by those who claim to see them, and developed by those who claim to have developed them. Even among themselves, I expect that there are disputes regarding who can show an aura and who can see them. And I'll bet the discussions are just as bizarre and hilarious as your posts here.
You need to be able to emerge some (the more the better) of your hidden consciousness.
Like you know that under the visible iceberg there is even a big chunk you suppose to know that under your outer mind
there is a huge chunk of knowledge so once you manage to emerge this knowledge you will be able to see things that
you normally wouldn't see.
This of course has nothing to do with be able to see what rats are doing inside holes or what is inside some magic boxes
or to know the correct Lotto number.
It is all related to spiritual things not mundane one.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould