Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 5:08 am
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Media v
More vindication for Mary Jane

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
More vindication for Mary Jane
Jaysyn Offline Donators
I am a meat popsicle
*****
Religious Views: My Imaginary Friend Hates the Same Things I Do.
Posts: 1965
Threads: 83
Joined: June 15, 2010
Reputation: 37
#1
More vindication for Mary Jane
January 11, 2012 at 12:27 pm (This post was last modified: January 11, 2012 at 12:34 pm by Jaysyn.)
Another nail in the coffin for the War on (Some) Drugs? It's on Fox, it's got to be true, right?

Marijuana Doesn't Appear to Harm Lung Function

"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Find
Reply
frankiej Offline
Wiggin' Specialist
****
Religious Views: Haruhiism
Posts: 5654
Threads: 133
Joined: May 10, 2011
Reputation: 69
#2
RE: More vindication for Mary Jane
January 11, 2012 at 12:28 pm
Page not found...


It certainly does affect my lungs... It seems to lower my lung capacity Tongue
Cunt
Find
Reply
Jaysyn Offline Donators
I am a meat popsicle
*****
Religious Views: My Imaginary Friend Hates the Same Things I Do.
Posts: 1965
Threads: 83
Joined: June 15, 2010
Reputation: 37
#3
RE: More vindication for Mary Jane
January 11, 2012 at 12:35 pm
(January 11, 2012 at 12:28 pm)frankiej Wrote: Page not found...

Fixed.
"How is it that a lame man does not annoy us while a lame mind does? Because a lame man recognizes that we are walking straight, while a lame mind says that it is we who are limping." - Pascal
Find
Reply
Minimalist Offline Donators
Go Blow Jesus Out Your Ass
*****
Religious Views: Fuck It
Posts: 69248
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation: 259
#4
RE: More vindication for Mary Jane
January 11, 2012 at 12:55 pm
And stoners everywhere rejoice.

Big Grin
Find
Reply
paintpooper Offline
I like drugs.
***
Religious Views: Physical laws of nature
Posts: 506
Threads: 16
Joined: May 20, 2010
Reputation: 5
#5
RE: More vindication for Mary Jane
January 12, 2012 at 2:51 pm
Duh. Replace MJ with tobacco and you have a happy populace.
Find
Reply
Jackalope Offline
Completely out of fucks
*******
Religious Views: Absent
Posts: 30576
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation: 141
#6
RE: More vindication for Mary Jane
January 12, 2012 at 2:53 pm
(January 12, 2012 at 2:51 pm)paintpooper Wrote: Duh. Replace MJ with tobacco and you have a happy populace.

...until the Twinkies are all gone.

Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Media v
More vindication for Mary Jane

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Mary Should've Aborted Foxaèr 30 5873 August 5, 2013 at 8:17 am
Last Post: Foxaèr
  What's the Harm: Eliza Jane Scovill leo-rcc 1 1132 February 21, 2010 at 12:20 am
Last Post: Rev. Rye



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)