Current time: 24th May 2013, 13:32
Our server costs $125 a month to run. Since January 2013 we have raised $263.37.
Please help keep our community online by donating what you can. Also visit our sister site: Freethought Forums!
Please help keep our community online by donating what you can. Also visit our sister site: Freethought Forums!
|
11 reasons god doesn't exist.
|
|
14th January 2012, 16:07
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist.
I agree with little Napoleon on this one.
|
||||||
|
14th January 2012, 16:53
|
||||||
|
||||||
RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist.
(14th January 2012 13:33)Braveheart Wrote: The only way we can know if god exists, is to perhaps drown a member of the forum..? Then revive them swiftly using defibrilators. Then they may come back on here and prove us all right/wrong! However, this would still only be a first person experience, as you can't take a camera into death with you. ): Theoretically, if there was an afterlife to experience, you wouldn't remember it anyway because memory is stored in the brain which becomes non-functional in death. You couldn't remember your existence in this life nor could you carry any memory of that on coming back to this world. But if souls do carry memory independent of the brain, why can't this be done with people who have Alzheimer's, amnesia or just too much to drink the night before? |
||||||
|
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "You seem to think circularity is logically invalid, it actually is not" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist, defending his use of circular reasoning |
||||||
Kudos given by (1): KichigaiNeko |
|
14th January 2012, 17:04
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist.
You had to go one better didn't you Paladin!
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
14th January 2012, 17:47
|
||||||
|
||||||
| RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist. | ||||||
|
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "You seem to think circularity is logically invalid, it actually is not" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist, defending his use of circular reasoning |
||||||
Kudos given by (1): Napoléon |
|
14th January 2012, 17:47
|
||||||
|
||||||
| RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist. | ||||||
|
14th January 2012, 19:37
|
||||||
|
||||||
RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist.
(14th January 2012 16:53)DeistPaladin Wrote: Theoretically, if there was an afterlife to experience, you wouldn't remember it anyway because memory is stored in the brain which becomes non-functional in death. You couldn't remember your existence in this life nor could you carry any memory of that on coming back to this world. I guess so, I never put much thought into it. So we really will never know until we're 100% dead. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
14th January 2012, 20:11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist.
You won't know then either, on account of being dead.
|
||||||
|
14th January 2012, 20:23
(This post was last modified: 14th January 2012 20:27 by Rhythm.)
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist.
One does wonder why there is so much redundancy in biological machinery as it pertains to consciousness and perception, if it has it's seat in an eternal/immortal/indestructable "soul". Why eyes if spirits can see? Why ears if spirits can hear? Why nerves if spirits can experience sensation, why brains if spirits can have memory....or control all of the above...etc etc etc? Why is it, also, that our "souls" cannot compensate and provide experience of these things when we lose function in any of this machinery?
|
||||||
Kudos given by (1): KichigaiNeko |
|
14th January 2012, 20:26
(This post was last modified: 14th January 2012 20:27 by Napoléon.)
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist.
Cuz it's bullshit. Next question.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Kudos given by (1): Rhythm |
|
15th January 2012, 01:09
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: 11 reasons god doesn't exist.
You can only disprove a god if its description provides a handle. For instance, if the description of a god clearly states that it does not lie, and a follower can drink any poison without ill effect, that claim can be tested. If the follower does suffer ill effects, then the specific god described does not exist. Another different god may still exist, but the specific one described has been disproved. It would be safe to say that the god described by the poisoned follower does not exist. Only a god that departs from that specific description in some way can possibly exist.
|
||||||
Kudos given by (3): KichigaiNeko, Napoléon, Rhythm |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




![[Image: opforum2.jpg]](http://opforum.net/opforum2.jpg)






![[Image: Napoleon_zpsf7c20461.jpg]](http://i1118.photobucket.com/albums/k619/jcincain/Public/Napoleon_zpsf7c20461.jpg)

![[Image: siguf.jpg]](http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/6444/siguf.jpg)



![[Image: honeybadg1.png]](http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/2388/honeybadg1.png)