Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 11:13 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'Intelligent' design?
#31
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
Rhythm, just as I can recognize that your post was designed, based on its specified complexity, I can then theorize that it was designed. The same goes for scenarios in the natural realm.
Reply
#32
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
No, you couldn't, apples and oranges. Have we moved on then, done with the "defend your assertions" bit. Off to bicker about something else? Don't talk to me about my posts, talk to me about these "designs" you seem to believe are so obvious. Is my post alive? Are we lacking a suitable explanation for my posts? Can you say nothing of the design or designer from them? Just diversionary bullshit.

I've had to burst this bubble before, and you may not believe me, but I don't actually enjoy doing so. ID is not science, we see no evidence of design. What ID is, and what we do see, is politics and religion. Now, if this notion of "design" really fascinated the shit out of you, if you're really interested, please please pursue that interest, life is fascinating, it's fascinating without this bullshit thrown over it, and it's even more fascinating because this stuff is demonstrable bullshit.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#33
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 10:29 pm)black36 Wrote: Rhythm, just as I can recognize that your post was designed, based on its specified complexity, I can then theorize that it was designed. The same goes for scenarios in the natural realm.

No its a hypothesis because you can't test or prove the assertion. I recognize you are not understanding the difference between Hypothesis and Theory so I hypothesize you are and idiot. Get it?
Reply
#34
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
There might be a way to test that, lol.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#35
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
Rhythm, So your answer of "no" qualifies as checkmate? You provide a response , symbolized by a specifically complex ordering of letters, spacing, and punctuation, which are relevant to the conversation, and I am wrong to theorize that said post was intelligently designed?
Reply
#36
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 10:38 pm)Rhythm Wrote: There might be a way to test that, lol.

But I'm lazy so it will never be done lol.
Reply
#37
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
You are wrong to "theorize" that you can make this observation without any reference to the design or designer. Isn't that what you claim that ID does? Well, it doesn't, and neither do you. So, in this case, yes, my "no" is a checkmate. Can't win them all. You chose the field, not me. No sense in being frustrated when your opponent has more practice in this particular game. In your defense, I have home field advantage.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#38
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
(March 11, 2012 at 10:36 pm)Insanity x Wrote:
(March 11, 2012 at 10:29 pm)black36 Wrote: Rhythm, just as I can recognize that your post was designed, based on its specified complexity, I can then theorize that it was designed. The same goes for scenarios in the natural realm.

No its a hypothesis because you can't test or prove the assertion. I recognize you are not understanding the difference between Hypothesis and Theory so I hypothesize you are and idiot. Get it?

Where did you get the idea that ID is just an assertion?
(March 11, 2012 at 10:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You are wrong to "theorize" that you can make this observation without any reference to the design or designer. Isn't that what you claim that ID does? Well, it doesn't, and neither do you. So, in this case, yes, my "no" is a checkmate. Can't win them all.

Ok, you win. Your post was not intelligently designed.
Reply
#39
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
I was actually talking about your post.. but sure ill bite.

The lack of any reasonable evidence.

Evolution - Vast fossil records and variation in billions of species around the world
ID - We think god did it.
Reply
#40
RE: 'Intelligent' design?
Inquiring minds-"God did what?"

ID-"We make no claims to the design or designer".

Well, you worthless little son of a bitch. Come back to the table when you have cards to play. This pretty much sums up my thoughts about ID.

@ Black How can you be sure that it wasn't, do you have any evidence?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Falling Dundee 9 1527 October 5, 2020 at 1:41 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  A Working Draft Design Argument Acrobat 54 5028 October 19, 2019 at 10:28 am
Last Post: GUBU
  Intelligent Design (brief overview). Mystic 70 12726 May 9, 2018 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Intelligent (?) Design Minimalist 12 4258 August 21, 2017 at 1:23 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  If God of Abraham is true, then why didnt he use his intelligent design to make a new Roeki 129 44101 July 9, 2017 at 2:11 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Finely-tuned universe wanted: Intelligent Designers need not apply. Time Traveler 38 8373 April 11, 2016 at 9:01 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  The stupid "Apex" "design" argument..... Brian37 23 5775 March 4, 2016 at 11:32 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Video Intelligent Design, The Designer is Drunk! Mental Outlaw 6 2178 March 15, 2015 at 6:24 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Disbelief in an intelligent creator = far fetched? Foxaèr 39 7723 January 12, 2015 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Nope
  Why intelligent design "proofs" are pointless robvalue 27 6323 September 13, 2014 at 4:14 pm
Last Post: fr0d0



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)