Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 18, 2024, 8:47 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Do you know this one?
#1
Do you know this one?
I enjoyed working on this little chestnut. Maybe you will too.

Use unit blocks (1 by 1 by 1 cubes) to build a larger cube with an odd edge length at least three unit blocks long. Now remove one stack of blocks (1 by 1 by n) from the larger cube. Explain why the number of blocks remaining must always be divisible by 24.
Reply
#2
RE: Do you know this one?
I can explain mathematically, in the form of a Proof by Induction.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Reply
#3
RE: Do you know this one?
(June 3, 2012 at 11:26 am)Tobie Wrote: I can explain mathematically, in the form of a Proof by Induction.

Well then I'd better specify that I'd like to hear something deductive. Without a doubt it is true and every such cube you test will be divisible by 24, but why must that be? I don't care if the response is a formal proof. I'm just looking for a structural accounting that guarantees divisibility by 24.
Reply
#4
RE: Do you know this one?
There's nothing wrong with proof by induction.
Reply
#5
RE: Do you know this one?
Huh I feel stupid now...
Reply
#6
RE: Do you know this one?
Drop the modular arithmetic on this sucker! It's super-straightforward.
So these philosophers were all like, "That Kant apply universally!" And then these mathematicians were all like, "Oh yes it Kan!"
Reply
#7
RE: Do you know this one?
I've been wracking my seemingly limited brains for hours...still nothing.
Reply
#8
RE: Do you know this one?
(June 3, 2012 at 12:29 pm)Tiberius Wrote: There's nothing wrong with proof by induction.

No one ever said that. Straw man.

He wants to see a solution in a particular fashion. Nothing that states all other solutions are incorrect or 'wrong' is written here.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#9
RE: Do you know this one?
(June 3, 2012 at 10:21 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote:
(June 3, 2012 at 12:29 pm)Tiberius Wrote: There's nothing wrong with proof by induction.

No one ever said that. Straw man.

He wants to see a solution in a particular fashion. Nothing that states all other solutions are incorrect or 'wrong' is written here.

Tobie shared his proof by induction with me by PM. A thing of beauty to be sure. As satisfying as anything else I've seen for this problem. So I agree, nothing at all wrong with induction.

Perhaps he'll consent to share it with us all soon. In the mean time, I usually ask exceptional middle school students to show me why every such construction must have three factors of 2 and one of 3, hence divisibility by 24. Some can account for the factor of 3 and two of the factors of 2. The third factor of 2 is usually the last to fall.
Reply
#10
RE: Do you know this one?
Here it is:
NB: I haven't written every step of working, to save time and effort.

no. of blocks forming one stack = 2n + 1.
total no. of blocks = (2n + 1)^3
Therefore blocks remaining = (2n + 1)(4n^2 + 4n) = f(n)

Basis: for n=1. No. blocks remaining = 3x8 = 24. Therefore divisible by 24.

Assume true for n=k. i.e. (2k + 1)(4k^2 +4k) is divisible by 24.

For n= k + 1.

f( k + 1) = 4(2k +3)(k^2 + 4k + 4)
f(k + 1) - f(k) = 24k^2 + 48k + 48
= 24(k^2 + 2k + 2)
Therefore, f(k + 1) = f(k) + 24(k^2 + 2k + 2)

Both terms of this expression are divisible by 24, therefore f(k + 1) is divisible by 24. It therefore stands by induction that f(n) is divisible by 24 for all integers n>=1.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)