'tu quoque' am I iwrong?

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

Lion; my post (number 3) this thread sets out the context.

In the meantime, peace has broken out between Xouper and me.

[Cato]

It's presumed that the term tu quoque applies to something which is equally as true as that to which it stands in relation.

What a load of verbose shit. 23 words (24 if I seperate the contraction It's) that communicate absolutely nothing.

'which is equally as true as that to which it stands in relation'????? What the fuck does this mean?

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

It's presumed that the term tu quoque applies to something which is equally as true as that to which it stands in relation.

What a load of verbose shit. 23 words (24 if I seperate the contraction It's) that communicate absolutely nothing.

'which is equally as true as that to which it stands in relation'????? What the fuck does this mean?

Thank you Cato: I was feeling really dense for not understanding. I thought Lion might be agreeing with me,but I wasn't quite sure.

[Lion IRC]

It's presumed that the term tu quoque applies to something which is equally as true as that to which it stands in relation.

What a load of verbose shit. 23 words (24 if I seperate the contraction It's) that communicate absolutely nothing.

'which is equally as true as that to which it stands in relation'????? What the fuck does this mean?

I have a feeling that my explanation would be a struggle for you as well.

I'm (I am) sorry for your loss.

[Cato]

What a load of verbose shit. 23 words (24 if I seperate the contraction It's) that communicate absolutely nothing.

'which is equally as true as that to which it stands in relation'????? What the fuck does this mean?

I have a feeling that my explanation would be a struggle for you as well.

I'm (I am) sorry for your loss.

No, it means that you can't even explain the meaning of your business speak, buzzword laden, weasel word sentence.

[Lion IRC]

I have a feeling that my explanation would be a struggle for you as well.

I'm (I am) sorry for your loss.

No, it means that you can't even explain the meaning of your business speak, buzzword laden, weasel word sentence.

How would YOU know what it explains?

You didnt (did not) even understand the first post.

Your expertise seems to lay in counting the number of words....

23 words (24 if I seperate the contraction It's"...

[Cato]

No, it means that you can't even explain the meaning of your business speak, buzzword laden, weasel word sentence.

How would YOU know what it explains?

You didnt (did not) even understand the first post.

Your expertise seems to lay in counting the number of words....

23 words (24 if I seperate the contraction It's"...

I didn't (and still don't) know what it explained. It was meaningless drivel, which is why I asked the question. The fact that in two subsequent posts you can't explain it proves my initial point.

[Lion IRC]

Lion; my post (number 3) this thread sets out the context...

It's OK if you dont want to go into it in more detail.
Never mind.
I read the original - in full.

[Angrboda]

Note that the latin 'tu quoque' means 'you, too,' or 'you, also.' If the accusation is a straightforward accusation of hypocrisy, in which the claim is one of inconsistent behavior, then the accusation does not actually involve a second, and therefore it is not strictly speaking a tu quoque fallacy because it doesn't have the appropriate logical structure. (I think. )