Evolution: Full of Fiction

[Creed of Heresy]

Response: Ssshhhhh. I said no defeated cry baby atheists allowed.

Aww how cute, you're ignoring how I just debunked your claims on the fossil records being false. That's so cute, it's almost like you're not actually nearly as "whiping the debate" as you first thought you were!

---

Just gonna plunk this back down right here so you can't pretend to ignore it. :]

Response: Similarly, I was correcting your quotation in the same fashion. So you hypocrisy and crying is amusing.

Intelligent people don't get sucked in by alleged ignorance either, so the fact that you claim to be caught in the vortex is self-acknowledgment again of your own idiocy. You just can't win.

But I understand. You're tired of being spanked in debate, so you want me banned. We get it. It's just sad for you because being banned because a person can't stomach being debunked repeatedly is only flattering for me, but makes you look like the defeated crybaby. Need a taffy?

Who is this "we?" Like I just said; nobody here, nor anywhere else, agrees with you. Is this the royal "we?" Rather too high up on your self for a muslim, don't you think?

And, no, you were just changing my quote to insult me. Big difference in comparison to me changing your quote around to actually state the truth, though I'm sure the nuances of subtlety are completely lost on you [given that logic clearly is].

I simply want you gone in the same way I would want the drunken idiot who keeps hitting on the barmaid I am trying to order a drink from [and get the number of] to get ejected from the club. It's not a matter of me feeling defeated because he's slurring about the size of his pecker to the girl who is clearly put off by his slobbering, sloppy advances; he's just an irritating and incredibly obnoxious nuisance. Kind of like you. You haven't done anything besides make an idiot out of yourself in public. If that really makes you feel better, well, that explains a LOT, then, doesn't it?

I look forwards to seeing you banned.

[Great Ape]

[pocaracas]

Response: Once again, crystals do not prove anything, and only confirms that it's ability to create originates from inteligence, not unintelligence. For if it is possible for unintelligence to originate a repeating pattern, then there should be no examples of unintelligence not being able to do so. BUT THERE IS. Can a dead body create a checkerboard pattern? No. Can a new born baby? No. So your evidence is false, since it clearly shows that unintelligence cannot originate a repeating pattern. Your argument fails and once again, evolution is proven utterly false.

What is it with you and babies?

Crystals prove that you can have a repeating pattern without the requirement of any intelligence behind it. It's all simply physics.... quantum physics.
And has nothing to do with evolution of the species. Just a simple example of order from apparent lack of it.
Educate yourself! How many people have told you this since you started spewing your crap all over the internet?

Once again, you cover your ears, like the ass you are:


Let's make the IF. If evolution is fiction, how do you account for all the similar, but distinct species in the world?
How do you account for the fact that some species are only found in some particular habitats?, such as kagaroos, polar bears, penguins, tigers, indian elephants, etc, etc, etc....
Why can't these species be found in places with approximately the same conditions, but separated from the original locations of these species by some sort of barrier?

[The Grand Nudger]

Response: Does evolution include creation originating from uninteligence? Yes.

No. It doesn't. It has nothing to do with "creation" whenever the hell that's supposed to have happened, by whatever means you'd like to propose.

So I'm confused about nothing, but rather, arguing that very same flawed premise.

Clearly you are confused. See above.

If one says that evolution is true, on the basis that inteligent designed originated it, then that's a logical claim. But the theory of evolution says nothing like that. So it's full of fiction.

Hardly a logical claim amigo (unless you'd like to make it so time:now- but wait a fucking minute, evolution is fiction until goddidit™? Just, wow....). Which theory of evolution are you referring to? What fiction?

[median]

Response: The idiocy has no apparent end. You don't need to take any biological courses in anthropology, paleontology, genetics, bio-chemistry, or anything else, .....to know simple and basic common sense. Creation originating from unintelligence does not create order. It can't even create a pattern that repeats itself.

You can take the body of a dead person as proof. Now if I ask the dead person to draw me a checkerboard pattern, what will be the result? Nothing. Why? The dead person cannot learn or comprehend what it is being told. In other words, it is unintelligent. As a result of its unintelligence, it cannot create intelligence or use it to create a pattern. Let us look at a new born baby. A baby is an intelligent species. Yet if I ask a new born to draw a repeating pattern with a paint brush, what will be the result. The answer is obvious. Nothing. Here, an intelligent being cannot create a simple drawing. Why? Because as we know, the child lacks the ability to comprehend what they are being told as a new born, thus lacking intelligence and from their lack of intelligence, cannot create a repeating pattern. Thus we see from two simple tested subjects of unintelligence and even slight intelligence that a pattern that repeats itself cannot be created, thus proving that it can only originate from intelligent design. Therefore, the solar system, water cycle, and other natural phenomenoms within the universe that repeat had to originate from intelligent design. DUMMY.

So you continue to sound stupid. The fact still remains that unintelligence cannot originat intelligence, nor can it create repeating patterns. Non-life cannot create life either. Yet evolution contains all of this as a FACT. It's sheer idiocy.

You're right! Your idiocy has no end. Keep telling yourself that in the mirror. First, there is no such thing as "common sense" when it comes to science, because science often demonstrates that your "common sense" (intuition) is wrong. But there is an even more basic problem you suffer from (stemming from how DAMN ignorant and arrogant you are). That is, you are using lots of terms which you have not defined (i.e. - intelligence, evolution, common sense, etc). Start there.

Second, your examples are so fucking flawed it's surprising you're actually committing yourself to them. Babies making repeating patterns somehow disproves your faulty conception of what evolution is?? BAAHAHAHAH! Please...

Babies can't create planets in motion, earthquakes, or neutrinos. So, the fuck, what! You are so full of fallacies, it's not even funny. Equivocation (not defining your terms), Red Herring (changing the subject), Straw-man (misrepresenting your opponents position), False Dichotomy (acting as though there are only two choices) and on and on. I have many Muslim friends who are FAR more intelligent (and intellectually honest) than you.

p.s. - Extreme deliberate ignorance (and credulity) always hears logic as "sounding stupid". That is your nature because you've poisoned your mind with superstition and being GULLIBLE.

Your extreme fallacies and arrogance display, with utter clarity, that it is YOU who is the "dummy", dummy. And you admitted it!! HAHAHAHAHA! "...don't need to take any biological courses in anthropology..." WOW. Deliberately uneducated. Keep trying... You still haven't demonstrated that you know what evolution is or means. Until then, you're simply full of shit.

[Creed of Heresy]

Oh look, his arguments are being torn asunder and he suddenly stops posting.

What a shock.

[Angrboda]

What is the point of this exercise? It is perhaps best that Al-Fatihah remain an evolution denier so that people can readily identify him as defective without bothering to listen to what he has to say.


“Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig.”

Robert Heinlein

[The Grand Nudger]

Hey common, folks are listening, it's just that what he has said thusfar is incapable of making the point he claimed Apo.

[Deicide73]

I just read this entire thread and I am appalled at Al-Fatihah's ignorance. Everyone has provided enough evidence to satisfy anyone's questions and all he does is cover his ears and shuts his eyes saying, "lalalalalalalalala I can't hear you". And yet he has not provided one shred of evidence in favor of his point of view.

[overlord fombax]

Hey, Al-Fatiyah. In your own words, define evolution.