Who’s been a naughty cyclist?

[Autumnlicious]

To be honest, who has [explicit annotation censored] really harmed?

How about all the people he sued for telling the truth?

How about the insurance company he scammed?

Let alone the poor honest riders who had no hope of winning when they were racing against cheats.... he's just a really nasty man, a bully who is happy to hurt anyone that gets in his way or that dare opposes him.

Given that there exists a large group of cheaters in the top ranked players for quite some time, it seems atypical to focus on Armstrong. There is a pervasive culture of doping -- one that is getting lesser attention than some overly litigious fool who now is exposed for appropriate counter suits.

He took EPO, testosterone and blood transfusions - what "health repercussions"?

Are you making a claim for that only positive effects came out of such usage?

If everyone is taking drugs I don't say "pass the bong please", I walk out of the room and leave. You can't excuse something because you're peers are doing it. Even so, the fact of the matter is that this petty pathetic man was such a nasty piece of work that he actively targeted and sued anyone that dare tell the truth about him.

Gee, that seems a common occurrence when people with money try to shut up people with less money.

I believe perjury is worse than rape, what do you think of that?

Comparing a brutal violation of self while being unable to fight it off to the act of purposefully engaging in deceit to save one's own hide?

Nothing positive. About the act of rape being lesser or about you.

[Creed of Heresy]

Moros, I think we need to come up with a term to describe your cool, detached, and clinical downslaps on people. Like the Hitchslap, except for Moros. I got nothin'. I'll work on that. XD

And, Daniel, perjury? Worse than rape? Clearly you've never been friends with or known anyone who was raped, never seen what it does to them. If you had, you'd rescind that statement in a moment.

[Aractus]

Given that there exists a large group of cheaters in the top ranked players for quite some time, it seems atypical to focus on Armstrong. There is a pervasive culture of doping -- one that is getting lesser attention than some overly litigious fool who now is exposed for appropriate counter suits.

Don't deflect.

1. How about all the people he sued for telling the truth?
   
2. How about the insurance company he scammed?
   

Are you making a claim for that only positive effects came out of such usage?

Negative health effects are unlikely. It's not as if he was shooting up on crack. Mostly it was simply blood doping with micro-injections of EPO. If you take your blood out, put it in a fridge, and then inject it again, would you expect negative health effects?

Comparing a brutal violation of self while being unable to fight it off to the act of purposefully engaging in deceit to save one's own hide?

Nothing positive. About the act of rape being lesser or about you.

It went right over your head, I understand that.

---

And, Daniel, perjury? Worse than rape? Clearly you've never been friends with or known anyone who was raped, never seen what it does to them. If you had, you'd rescind that statement in a moment.

Well, perjury is an act of treason. By definition alone I believe that makes it worse.

[Creed of Heresy]

And, Daniel, perjury? Worse than rape? Clearly you've never been friends with or known anyone who was raped, never seen what it does to them. If you had, you'd rescind that statement in a moment.

Well, perjury is an act of treason. By definition alone I believe that makes it worse.

Actually perjury is not an act of treason, it's an act of miscarriage of justice. Even in a litigation standpoint of punishment, perjury carries a 5 year prison sentence. Rape can carry a life sentence. The harm brought via perjury is far less than the harm brought by rape. And rape also includes the molestation or sexual assault of children. What you believe and what is reality are two different things, here.

[Aractus]

I don't know Creed. $7.5 million is a lot of money ... surely you aren't saying that the average rapist is worse than someone who conspires to misappropriate funds in that amount? By committing an act of perjury - a criminal act against the State...

[Something completely different]

Didn`t notice.



Probably because over here, no one cares about the tour de france, and probably never will.

[Aractus]

Given that there exists a large group of cheaters in the top ranked players for quite some time, it seems atypical to focus on Armstrong. There is a pervasive culture of doping -- one that is getting lesser attention than some overly litigious fool who now is exposed for appropriate counter suits.

Oh and one other thing on this trend. See if you can see what I've done here.

Given that there exists a large group of drug dealers in the social underworld for quite some time, it seems atypical to focus on a specific dealer. There is a pervasive culture of street narcotics -- one that is getting lesser attention than some overly litigious fool who now is exposed for his narcotics trades.

On a previous forum I was a member of, now defunct, for several years we had one member who was a former cocaine dealer. As you might imagine, we were natural born enemies, rarely agreed on anything. This particular person had told the story several times of how one of their children was shot dead in front of them, at their house, they knew who the shooter was and the police did nothing. We had two very different perspectives on this.

My perspective - you have no right to appeal to the law when you are a career criminal who was at the time dealing coke and thus committing crimes against the State and against the community. I further pointed out that they had never served a single day of incarceration for their crimes, and that their child was killed because of their own doing.

Their perspective was that the police shouldn't discriminate, especially as their child wasn't the drug dealer. That they had a duty to the community to remove that person from society.

[Darth]

My perspective - you have no right to appeal to the law when you are a career criminal who was at the time dealing coke and thus committing crimes against the State and against the community. I further pointed out that they had never served a single day of incarceration for their crimes, and that their child was killed because of their own doing.

I'm sure jesus would agree with that statement, right?

[Nine]

My perspective - you have no right to appeal to the law when you are a career criminal who was at the time dealing coke and thus committing crimes against the State and against the community. I further pointed out that they had never served a single day of incarceration for their crimes, and that their child was killed because of their own doing.

Their perspective was that the police shouldn't discriminate, especially as their child wasn't the drug dealer. That they had a duty to the community to remove that person from society.

So you think the criminal should literally get away with murder while denying any justice for the child, the child's mother, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles and all other family members all who's only crime is being related to a drug dealer.

[Zen Badger]

So because the parent was a drug dealer the child should be denied justice and the killer let off.

Really weasel boy, your insufferable self important arrogance knows no bounds.