Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 4:49 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
#11
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
Why is it the only angels I ever see are scantily clad hot chicks?

What is wrong with me?
Reply
#12
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
(March 27, 2013 at 2:21 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: [quote='samiam2013' pid='422086' dateline='1364408219']

Why do people claim to see Sasqutch?

Why do people claim to see a chupacabra?

To be fair, I think the two creatures you have described are more likely to be confirmed as real, than god. As they are supposed physical beings, if they exist, then one day you'd expect one caught.

We'll never catch "a god" will we, seeing as though gods are immaterial, other dimensional beings that do not manifest in any described physical way.
You are currently experiencing a lucky and very brief window of awareness, sandwiched in between two periods of timeless and utter nothingness. So why not make the most of it, and stop wasting your life away trying to convince other people that there is something else? The reality is obvious.

Reply
#13
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
(March 27, 2013 at 4:36 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: Why is it the only angels I ever see are scantily clad hot chicks?

What is wrong with me?
Been watching Victoria's Secret commercials?
Reply
#14
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels



Historically, angels were nasty creatures, more terrifying than comforting. But they've been rehabilitated.


I suspect from the wording and the need to control the format of his presentation, our "atheist" is just a theist on a fishing expedition.

samiam2013's Forum Info
[Image: samiam2013-time-online.png]


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#15
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
(March 27, 2013 at 4:49 pm)apophenia Wrote:


Historically, angels were nasty creatures, more terrifying than comforting. But they've been rehabilitated.


I suspect from the wording and the need to control the format of his presentation, our "atheist" is just a theist on a fishing expedition.



Funny, I got exactly the same vibe.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -Einstein
Reply
#16
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
(March 27, 2013 at 4:45 pm)futilethewinds Wrote: Been watching Victoria's Secret commercials?

I've been known to "imbibe" on occasion.
Reply
#17
Re: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
Hallucinations happen. You say it was just before losing people, were either of them sick at the time? Stress can make our brains do some crazy shit you wouldn't believe. When my grandfather was in a psychiatric hospital a couple of years following a few suicide attempts, I started having some weird hallucinations, like I'd hear an outgoing ring tone (you know, the sound you hear when you're showing someone) out loud several times a day, and once I was going to have a shower and noticed a bunch of ladybirds crawling all over the window. It wasn't like I just saw them for a second out of the corner of my eye, I stood there.and counted them and had a think about what to do. I decided to have my shower quickly and deal with them after. I turned away to turn on the shower and looked back around and they were all gone. I must have hallucinated them.

Basically, hallucinations are common and seem totally real and indistinguishable from real life, and angels... Well, angels don't exist.
Reply
#18
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
(March 27, 2013 at 4:36 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: Why is it the only angels I ever see are scantily clad hot chicks?

What is wrong with me?

Apparently, you're fine.
Reply
#19
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
(March 27, 2013 at 2:16 pm)samiam2013 Wrote: I have always doubted the existence of a god or gods, but recently have seen more than before than it makes sense that there is no god. I do however, have problems with one thing: the acknowledgement of my grandfather to having seen angels just before both my mother and his sister dying. Is there a solid argument for why seeing angels is a delusion? (he was illiterate, believed in god, and went to church while living a simple life as a carpenter)

Since your grandfather is apparently an expert on angels, could you ask him this question, which nags at me incessantly: When an angel wants to fly, does he/she (it?) actually have to FLAP its wings like a bird, or does it simply EXTEND its wings and point one or both arms upward and just take off (like Superman does)? Or, are they actually capable of instantaneously disappearing and reappearing wherever they choose, and the wings are merely for decoration? Is it a coincidence that when the bible was written, the only beasts capable of real flight (birds) had wings, so that when angels were described as being able to “descend” from heaven, they were attributed wings also? I just can't stop thinking about these things...
"If there are gaps they are in our knowledge, not in things themselves." Chapman Cohen

"Shit-apples don't fall far from the shit-tree, Randy." Mr. Lahey
Reply
#20
RE: atheist argument against the widespread witness of angels
(March 27, 2013 at 2:16 pm)samiam2013 Wrote: I have always doubted the existence of a god or gods, but recently have seen more than before than it makes sense that there is no god. I do however, have problems with one thing: the acknowledgement of my grandfather to having seen angels just before both my mother and his sister dying. Is there a solid argument for why seeing angels is a delusion? (he was illiterate, believed in god, and went to church while living a simple life as a carpenter)

Well there's your answer right there are the end. Human beings are very good at self-delusion, and if they have a predisposition to not questioning those delusions, they're more likely to take them at face value.

As for angels themselves, well... If they DO exist, I take it that they look like this: (big image)



And if they look like that, I'm going to make it my life's goal to be a specialized Angel Fall From...Grace...Er. Yes. Fall-from-grace-er. I need to work on the job title a bit more.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy? FlatAssembler 61 2574 June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  A simple argument against God Disagreeable 149 12658 December 29, 2022 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  My Almighty VS your argument against it Won2blv 43 3745 May 5, 2022 at 9:13 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ? R00tKiT 225 15524 April 17, 2022 at 2:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What is the best counter argument against "What do you lose by believing?" Macoleco 25 1842 May 1, 2021 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Argument Against Evil-lution no one 19 3468 January 5, 2020 at 7:58 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  I told my little girl about angels yesterday... Jehanne 44 10741 September 6, 2017 at 11:23 am
Last Post: mordant
  Pope Francis, a witness to atheism. Jehanne 11 2755 September 15, 2016 at 1:26 am
Last Post: Foxaèr
  The "Stalin Was an Atheist" argument ErGingerbreadMandude 17 3697 June 7, 2016 at 11:22 am
Last Post: mlmooney89
  Matt Dillahunty's great argument against some people who deny Evolution Heat 1 2270 November 11, 2015 at 4:12 am
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)