Now, for the believer who simply accepts that there really is no proof of a personal god, and that faith is your sole reason for believing in one, rather than logic or reason, this question really isn't for you.
This question is for the believer who feels as if logic and reason have led to and justified his/her faith. Most people who fall into this category argue that existence itself is evidence of a personal god.
If that is your argument, then you must also conclude that god's existence is evidence of his creator. And, with that, we find ourselves, once again, facing yet another question leading to a question that leads to another question.... and so on infinitely.
With that in mind, I would like to see the most compelling arguments Theists can come up with addressing this rather obvious dilemma.
This question is for the believer who feels as if logic and reason have led to and justified his/her faith. Most people who fall into this category argue that existence itself is evidence of a personal god.
If that is your argument, then you must also conclude that god's existence is evidence of his creator. And, with that, we find ourselves, once again, facing yet another question leading to a question that leads to another question.... and so on infinitely.
With that in mind, I would like to see the most compelling arguments Theists can come up with addressing this rather obvious dilemma.