Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 11:00 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
#41
RE: Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
Update: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-5...rney-says/

Charges won't be dropped. Looks like she'll have to accept the plea deal (two years house arrest plus a year of probation, and she may have to register as a sex offender) or fight it in court.
Reply
#42
RE: Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
(May 21, 2013 at 12:44 pm)Tiberius Wrote: On (2), the fact of the matter is, a parent could quite easily do this at any time. If a 17 year old dates a 16 year old, and the 17 year old turns 18, what is to stop the parents from filing charges of lewd behaviour against the 18 year old? The fact that there were in a relationship seems to become irrelevant to the law, which it shouldn't be.

no they wouldn't face charges.... that's my entire point
Reply
#43
RE: Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
(May 21, 2013 at 8:00 pm)cratehorus Wrote: no they wouldn't face charges.... that's my entire point
It would depend on the age of consent. I was assuming it was 18.
Reply
#44
RE: Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
(May 21, 2013 at 8:02 pm)Tiberius Wrote:
(May 21, 2013 at 8:00 pm)cratehorus Wrote: no they wouldn't face charges.... that's my entire point
It would depend on the age of consent. I was assuming it was 18.

no....... their birthdays would be less than 24 months apart in that scenario....therefore if one is 18 and another is a minor the courts could only get involved if the minor was more than 24 months younger......

if they at some point in their lives were 16 while the other was 17 it's safe too assume that their birthdays are less than 24 months apart....right?
Reply
#45
RE: Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
Ok, gotcha now. Slight misunderstanding with what the law said. Changing the age limit would help, then, yes. Perhaps to 4 years, if the couple are peers at school or were peers at school when the relationship began.
Reply
#46
RE: Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
(May 19, 2013 at 9:44 pm)cratehorus Wrote: because baby fucking isn't cool buddy....its not cool at all

Okay... *WHY* isn't it cool? What are (get this) THE UNDERLYING REASONS that baby-fucking isn't cool?

Quote:they do? you can't accuse someone of rape without a medical examination...statutory rape is different which can just be a confession or evidence of a sexual act

You can accuse anyone of anything, regardless of whether you have evidence or not. The purpose of the court is to then ask 'what evidence do you have?', and if no evidence is provided: the case should be dismissed.

But: what should happen, and what does happen... they are not always one and the same.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/20...state.html

And sometimes the evidence indicates something happened which did not happen, which is to say: everyone who's ever been Shawshanked... which can happen in rape allegations.

"Statutory rape" isn't rape if it isn't rape, no matter what finagling you do to make it sound like it is rape. Honestly: it should be done away with entirely.

Quote:no they shouldn't without changing the laws first

Yes they should, but the law(s) should also be changed, yes.

Quote:yes this argument from authority....in this case it means i win.... this is not an lgbt issue anymore than nambla or preist fucking

Or really, it means that we can dismiss your argument as illogical, and instead talk about bananas (an infinitely more interesting subject matter than an argument from authority). You're saying this thread is now about bananas? Excellent.

How the hell would it matter if it is an LGBT issue? What the fuck are you on about? Thinking


(May 19, 2013 at 2:30 pm)Gilgamesh Wrote: if you guys all want to legalize 70 year old men marrying 6 year old girls that's your opinion........ but good luck getting that passed in any modern court....plenty of countries where this realtionship is perfectly legal....(although since it is a homosexual relationship there might also be some problems with those countries involving decapitation and such)

Or... maybe you could do away with age-laws completely as being nonsense? Angel

(May 20, 2013 at 5:10 am)Tiberius Wrote:
cratehorus Wrote:if you guys all want to legalize 70 year old men marrying 6 year old girls that's your opinion
None of us are arguing that; you are creating a strawman.

You seem to think that laws should be absolute, that there are never any exceptions to the law. I disagree. I think that a young couple should not have to be punished if one of the couple suddenly becomes an adult.

Y'know... even if we WERE arguing that, wouldn't you like to at least see WHY he's against it? Skunk

(May 21, 2013 at 8:02 pm)Tiberius Wrote: It would depend on the age of consent. I was assuming it was 18.

Two year olds seem to believe the age of consent is 2, given how expressive they are about that which they will not consent to.

Funny that they're then forced to do that which they will not consent to Sleepy

(May 22, 2013 at 4:20 am)Tiberius Wrote: Ok, gotcha now. Slight misunderstanding with what the law said. Changing the age limit would help, then, yes. Perhaps to 4 years, if the couple are peers at school or were peers at school when the relationship began.

How about changing age-limits to a measure of that-which-age-is-assumed-to-provide limits instead?

The day someone here takes the plunge and hashes out exactly which characteristics are involved in determining that which enables one person to consent when another person is not enabled to consent... that'll be a great day Smile

Maybe I should do it myself... but then I might as well just talk to myself.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply
#47
RE: Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
(May 22, 2013 at 4:20 am)Tiberius Wrote: Ok, gotcha now. Slight misunderstanding with what the law said. Changing the age limit would help, then, yes. Perhaps to 4 years, if the couple are peers at school or were peers at school when the relationship began.

cheers Big Grin

(May 22, 2013 at 3:14 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: Okay... *WHY* isn't it cool? What are (get this) THE UNDERLYING REASONS that baby-fucking isn't cool?
are you seriously asking me to expain why old men shouldn't fuck lil babies?

Quote:You can accuse anyone of anything, regardless of whether you have evidence or not. The purpose of the court is to then ask 'what evidence do you have?', and if no evidence is provided: the case should be dismissed.
when a rape victim accuses someone of rape she/he must submit to a medical examination....that examination would provide said evidence .......with statutory rape there would be no evidence of violence since the sex was consentual...... therefore age limits and proof of intercourse such as a used condom would be sufficient evidence


Quote:"Statutory rape" isn't rape if it isn't rape, no matter what finagling you do to make it sound like it is rape. Honestly: it should be done away with entirely.
what about child molestation? if i rape a baby.... and make them think my cock is a lollipop..... the child consents

Quote:Or really, it means that we can dismiss your argument as illogical, and instead talk about bananas (an infinitely more interesting subject matter than an argument from authority). You're saying this thread is now about bananas? Excellent.
yes and bananas should be made legal

Quote:How the hell would it matter if it is an LGBT issue? What the fuck are you on about? Thinking
you lgbt assholes are always stealing every fucking issue and making it your own.....if someone attacks someone and screams fag it's a hate crime regardless if the victim is homosexual or not..... but if somoene screams pussy no feminist group starts accusing the attacker of being biased against women........ why is that?
Reply
#48
RE: Laws against underage sex need to have more realistic exemptions.
(May 23, 2013 at 12:29 am)cratehorus Wrote: are you seriously asking me to expain why old men shouldn't fuck lil babies?

Yes, I am.

Christ... you don't know, do you? Sleepy

Quote:when a rape victim accuses someone of rape she/he must submit to a medical examination....that examination would provide said evidence .......with statutory rape there would be no evidence of violence since the sex was consentual...... therefore age limits and proof of intercourse such as a used condom would be sufficient evidence

Well then, no rape conviction is possible if the person is given a bath by the rapist afterwards, is it? Sleepy

I'll have to keep that in mind next time I rape someone. And I'll make sure I throw the condom away, maybe burn it in a wood stove Thinking

Would you like to explain to me why a lesbian couple is using a condom? Indeed... how do you prove that sex is occurring? Is there a video of it? But then... why even ask this: what are the reasons that "statutory rape" is branded as such in the first place?


Quote:what about child molestation? if i rape a baby.... and make them think my cock is a lollipop..... the child consents

Babies want for more than milk? Interesting.

And children can consent to many things... what's special about consenting to sex (of whatever form)? How is it any different to consenting to anything else? If a child knows what a lollipop is, they'll realize pretty quickly that it's like no lollipop they've ever tasted, and whether they enjoy it or do not will be the reason they continue at lapping at it or not. Unless it's an abuse case, eh? Angel

Usually, lying to the ignorant would be considered abuse.

Quote:yes and bananas should be made legal

You kidding me? That's worse than human trafficking being made legal.

Quote:you lgbt assholes are always stealing every fucking issue and making it your own.....if someone attacks someone and screams fag it's a hate crime regardless if the victim is homosexual or not..... but if somoene screams pussy no feminist group starts accusing the attacker of being biased against women........ why is that?

What the fuck are you talking about? ROFLOL Thanks for the entertainment, I guess.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A thing about choice and laws in the USA ShinyCrystals 7 888 October 15, 2023 at 10:14 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Kellyanne Conway posts nude photo of her underage daughter Rev. Rye 15 1272 January 27, 2021 at 6:23 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Why Red Flag Laws Won't Work. onlinebiker 203 9412 August 26, 2019 at 4:09 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Can You Guess Which Countries Have More "Women In Parliament" Than The USA? ReptilianPeon 7 1404 July 13, 2018 at 7:13 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  That's odd...I thought we were a nation of laws? GODZILLA 24 4657 June 25, 2018 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  The Power of Freedom vs. Hate Speech Laws Mechaghostman2 13 1574 May 1, 2018 at 10:02 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Right to Work laws in America Joods 25 2412 April 18, 2018 at 4:33 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Republican advisor made a woman a sex slave Rev. Rye 67 7860 April 12, 2018 at 10:40 am
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Laws Are No Better Than The Fuckheads Who Enforce Them Minimalist 2 594 April 3, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Conservatives have more self-control John V 248 25266 January 31, 2018 at 9:37 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)