Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Wow
June 7, 2013 at 12:19 pm
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2013 at 12:20 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
(June 7, 2013 at 10:34 am)Faith No More Wrote: Ever notice that those that claim to have been taken out of context rarely, if ever, clarify as to exactly what the context was?
Probably because the original context is always "I'm a douchebag."
Also, they know that if they try to provide a context then they'll look even more of a douchebag than they already do.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Posts: 5336
Threads: 198
Joined: June 24, 2010
Reputation:
77
RE: Wow
June 7, 2013 at 1:13 pm
(June 7, 2013 at 11:58 am)Minimalist Wrote: You read bodice-rippers, D-P?
No, it was a movie.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Posts: 69248
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: Wow
June 7, 2013 at 2:30 pm
I agree with Richard Jeni.
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Wow
June 7, 2013 at 3:22 pm
Yeah right. Cut to the good stuff.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
