Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)

[Lemonvariable72]

In all fairness last poet , he could very well be a scientist. People do strange things to cling to faith.

This has nothing to do with faith...assumptions over assumptions...not everyone who presents evidence of creation is a religious nut you know...im against religions, now you know so pls dont bring it up again. This has nothing to do with religion but science.

Yes, well it doesn't then your assertion has just been challenged on various point by me and two other users successfully. While I now realize I read part of your argument as divine inspiration of kabballah which I addressed, I'd like add one more thing. You have no justification for calling it god as even if one accepts your argument whole heartedly as you do you know nothing about this thing you call "god" except that it created a singularity that produced a universe with certian properties.

[insider432]

One sidereal day is the time it takes for a star in the sky to come back to the same place in the sky. Because, for all intents and purposes, the sky is “fixed”, a sidereal day is when the earth rotates 360°. A sidereal day is 23 hours 56 minutes and 4.09 seconds long.

A Solar day is variable, some days are longer than others depending on the season. Have you never read a farmer's almanac??
The reason for the leap years is to correlate sidereal years with solar years and their timing is not exact nor a multiple of nine.

Your magic "nine" shit is pathetic.

Furthermore, if we re-cast this in base 16, we get:
5A0 minutes in a day = adds up to F
15180 seconds in a day = adds up to F
2760 minutes in a week = adds up to F
80520 minutes in a year = adds up to F

F is the magic number!

Base 10 is the only system that corresponds to and reflects physical reality. All other bases are bogus. The base 10 system was not invented but discovered in nature.

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 = 36 = 9
9 is the sum of all digits in a base 10, try that with any other base.

at the same time you cannot distuingish between a 9 and a 0 using the digital root method. 9 models everything and nothing simultaneously. It is both the singularity and the vacuum.

9 + any digit will return the same.

the number 9 has unique properties other numbers do not have and its the invisible driving force.

---

This has nothing to do with faith...assumptions over assumptions...not everyone who presents evidence of creation is a religious nut you know...im against religions, now you know so pls dont bring it up again. This has nothing to do with religion but science.

Yes, well it doesn't then your assertion has just been challenged on various point by me and two other users successfully.

Dont think so. You have provided nothing to challenge any of this. First spend some time understanding what i pointed out to you because you clearly don't. This is not about God but the fact that this physical universe is a creation, nothing more and nothing less. Either certain forces are intelligent themselves and therefor inherit consciousness OR those unseen forces are governed by some sort of intelligence, there are no other options. to label this chance or coincidence reflects the highest form of ignorance.

[feeling]

The cadeus sinus line analogy made me lol

[Brakeman]

Base 10 is the only system that corresponds to and reflects physical reality. All other bases are bogus. The base 10 system was not invented but discovered in nature.

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 = 36 = 9
9 is the sum of all digits in a base 10, try that with any other base.

at the same time you cannot distuingish between a 9 and a 0 using the digital root method. 9 models everything and nothing simultaneously. It is both the singularity and the vacuum.

9 + any digit will return the same.

the number 9 has unique properties other numbers do not have and its the invisible driving force.

Binary is the natural base, ever heard of a base ten light switch?
As for your hexadecimal, they all work like that.
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+a+b+c+d+e+f=78 7+8=f

Lets try base 6..
1+2+3+4+5 = 15 1+5 = 6 Funny how that works isn't it?

[insider432]

The cadeus sinus line analogy made me lol

Sure laugh all you want but thats what the ancient cadeuces symbol represents. Creation. The snakes are symbolical representations of a sinewave and co-sine wave. Those 2 make up time and space, scientific fact. You can go and look that up. Everything in physical existance has a vibration to it, another scientific fact.

"If you want to fidn the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration" - Nikola Tesla

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...ether.html

Why can we find the hexagram shape all over the ancient world? How did they know thousands of years ago?

[Foxaèr]

Why can we find the hexagram shape all over the ancient world?

Primitive men liked that shape?

How did they know thousands of years ago?

They did not. Your mistake is that you are attributing their aesthetic attraction to a particular shape to some higher meaning that does not exist.

[insider432]

Base 10 is the only system that corresponds to and reflects physical reality. All other bases are bogus. The base 10 system was not invented but discovered in nature.

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 = 36 = 9
9 is the sum of all digits in a base 10, try that with any other base.

at the same time you cannot distuingish between a 9 and a 0 using the digital root method. 9 models everything and nothing simultaneously. It is both the singularity and the vacuum.

9 + any digit will return the same.

the number 9 has unique properties other numbers do not have and its the invisible driving force.

Binary is the natural base, ever heard of a base ten light switch?
As for your hexadecimal, they all work like that.
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+a+b+c+d+e+f=78 7+8=f

Lets try base 6..
1+2+3+4+5 = 15 1+5 = 6 Funny how that works isn't it?

You dont get it. I said 9 models the singularity and the vacuum at the same time. Its everything and nothing simultaneously.

Base 6:

1+2+3+4+5 = 15 = 6 sum of all digits = vacuum approved yes

lets see if base 6 corresponds to singularity.

6 + any digit does NOT return the same digit

6+2 = 8 and NOT 2 = fail
6+6 = 12 = 3 and NOT 6 = fail
6+5 = 11 = 2 and not 5 = fail

Base 10:

9+2 = 11 = 2
9+6 = 15 = 6
9+5 = 14 = 5

it returns the same digit, 9 is invisible. 9 is everything and nothing at the same time...

get it now?

base 10 is unique and the only REAL base system that corresponds to and reflects physical reality. It is both the singularity and the vacuum. 9 models everything and nothing simultaneously. ALL OTHER BASE SYSTEMS IN EXISTENCE ARE BOGUS ADN DO NOT REFLECT REALITY.

---

Why can we find the hexagram shape all over the ancient world?

Primitive men liked that shape?

How did they know thousands of years ago?

They did not. Your mistake is that you are attributing their aesthetic attraction to a particular shape to some higher meaning that does not exist.

You guys are not informed. That shape is connected to sub atomic vibration and magnetic forces. IF (big IF) this is just coincidence then its the biggest coincidence ever recorded throughout history. Ancient artwork designs referring to certain shapes have been discovered to be the result of certain cymatic frequencies. Reproduced in the lab, just saying.

[Foxaèr]

You guys are not informaed. That shape is connected to sub atomic vibration and magnetic forces. IF (big IF) this is just coincidence

No if about it. It is a coincidence to which you want to attribute more than is necessary because you want desperately to believe in magic.

[Jacob(smooth)]

The cadeus sinus line analogy made me lol

Why can we find the hexagram shape all over the ancient world? How did they know thousands of years ago?

Ooooo, I know this one...

via Imgflip Meme Maker
What you have is what people like to call "something a bit odd". It's the very model of a gunslinger fallacy.

---

[Ryantology]

Our minds are designed to recognize patterns and discern their meaning because doing so is important to our survival. This does, of course, mean that our minds are very prone to seeing what appear to be patterns and inventing meaning for them when none is apparent.