Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 8:03 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
#21
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
(January 8, 2014 at 12:28 am)rasetsu Wrote: Granted, I don't put any stock in it, but interpreting the fossil evidence alone as the result of a catastrophic flood is on much more equal footing with the evolutionary hypothesis, if, one doesn't take into account other evidences which corroborate the evolutionary hypothesis, and demote the global flood hypothesis.

(January 8, 2014 at 8:46 am)FreeTony Wrote: A good scientific hypothesis shouldn't allow information to be "interpretted".* It should include a way of testing the hypothesis.
False.

(January 8, 2014 at 8:46 am)FreeTony Wrote: Even if all we had was the fossil record, if a global flood 4000-6000 years ago was a scientific hypothesis you would expect to see a mass extinction (amongst land animals) event 4-6000 years ago in the fossil record. You then go and look at the fossils to see if this is the case.


Thests almost never make good hypotheses when talking about their religion. They say "God exists". "How do I test this claim of yours" you reply. "Don't test God!" or "You can't" or "You have to believe he exists first" are the sorts of untestable claims you get back.

What is the Creationism hypothesis? How do you test it? The answer isn't reading the bible.
I don't see how any of this relates to the point I was making.


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#22
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
(January 8, 2014 at 1:58 am)rasetsu Wrote:
(January 8, 2014 at 12:48 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: You are being too charitable. There is another feature played out in the fossil record that was predicted by evolution before it was truly discovered. The simpler organisms procede the more complex ones. Obviously there are reversion's and simple organism that survive very well, such as horseshoe crabs, but this is the order in the sediments (you do not need to even under stand the geologic colomn or its age to understand that bottom sediments are older.)
Invertabates
Fish
Amphibians
Reptiles
Mammals.

When a theory predicts the behavior of a natural phenomenon, that phenomenon is evidence for that theory. Much like the law of attraction is phenomenon that is predicted by the theory of gravity by newton.

I didn't say it wasn't evidence in support of the hypothesis of evolution, only that it doesn't rule out other interpretations by itself. And note that you brought in additional lines of evidence in order to count "a hit," but didn't subtract a hit for the paucity of the fossil record, and its less than stellar testimony to transitional forms. Being skeptical means you count both the hits and the misses, and weigh all hypotheses on the same scale. Arguably, on the fossil record alone, ignoring shared assumptions, evolution still wins, but it's no longer a slam dunk and therefore becomes a claim in need of additional evidence.


Actually we have a good deal of transitional forms
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/List_of_tra...Vertebrate
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply
#23
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
(January 8, 2014 at 8:58 am)rasetsu Wrote:
(January 8, 2014 at 8:46 am)FreeTony Wrote: A good scientific hypothesis shouldn't allow information to be "interpretted".* It should include a way of testing the hypothesis.
False.

Don't just say "False". Explain why you think this is false.

Unless I got it wrong, I thought you were saying that the fossil record equally supported a global flood hypothesis and an evolution hypothesis.
Reply
#24
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
(January 8, 2014 at 9:32 am)FreeTony Wrote:
(January 8, 2014 at 8:58 am)rasetsu Wrote:
(January 8, 2014 at 8:46 am)FreeTony Wrote: A good scientific hypothesis shouldn't allow information to be "interpretted".* It should include a way of testing the hypothesis.

False.

Don't just say "False". Explain why you think this is false.

"Whenever you see a sweeping statement that a tremendous amount can come from a very small number of assumptions, you always find that it is false. There are usually a large number of implied assumptions that are far from obvious if you think about them sufficiently carefully."
~ Richard Feynman


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#25
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
A good scientific hypothesis should explain beforehand what you expect the data to be if the hypothesis is correct. A good scientific hypothesis: "If I link 2 force meters together and pull on both, both should show the same force"

If the 2 reading are the same (within errors and repeated lots of times) then this supports the hypothesis. If I find a number of readings that are sufficiently different, they disprove the hypothesis.
Reply
#26
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
(January 7, 2014 at 8:12 pm)Bunny Wrote:
(January 7, 2014 at 7:53 pm)victor4128 Wrote: Posts like this are why your on my Sig Angel Cloud

I went to rep you because.. your sig. Esquilax is also my hero Heart
Oh and Stephen Colbert. And Ryantology. And your avatar. But alas I was your first rep ever. Guess you'll just have to put up with a high five in the face, bunny style Big Grin

Bunny!! Your always so nice to me! all of you ahould check out david pakman
ALL PRAISE THE ONE TRUE GOD ZALGO


Reply
#27
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
I'm sorry, but part of the whole point of scientific hypotheses is to provide an interpretation by which to understand and explain the data. Ex: Physicists interpret the empirical discovery of time dilation and length contraction as evidence as to the relativity of space and time, and they use that to interpret and explain further empirical data they gather. Rasetsu seems right on the money here.
"The reason things will never get better is because people keep electing these rich cocksuckers who don't give a shit about you."
-George Carlin
Reply
#28
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
I think the original claim was that the fossil record as observed could support a global flood hypothesis. I objected to this as there is nothing in the fossil record to suggest a global flood. It could support the hypothesis if there was some evidence, e.g. a mass extinction event 5000 years ago. If almost every land animal died, you'd see it in the fossil record.

It was only this line I objected to: "but interpreting the fossil evidence alone as the result of a catastrophic flood is on much more equal footing with the evolutionary hypothesis, if, one doesn't take into account other evidences which corroborate the evolutionary hypothesis, and demote the global flood hypothesis. "

There must be crossed wires somewhere as I'm not trying to express anything controversial! Maybe it's down to the definition of "interpret". What I'm trying to get around is the fact that some people will, for example, "interpret" a noise at night in their bedroom to be a ghost.
Reply
#29
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
(January 9, 2014 at 10:57 am)MindForgedManacle Wrote: I'm sorry, but part of the whole point of scientific hypotheses is to provide an interpretation by which to understand and explain the data. Ex: Physicists interpret the empirical discovery of time dilation and length contraction as evidence as to the relativity of space and time, and they use that to interpret and explain further empirical data they gather. Rasetsu seems right on the money here.

You are right except that evolution has predicted the behavior of the fossil record very well as I outlined before. Orinthosaurs are a great example of this. We foubd them first almost a 100 years ago and they were instantly recognized for their birdlike features. However at that time they were not found with feather impressions and only a few people thought that Dinosaurs likely had feathers ( namely Huxley and Darwin.) However more recently many feathered dinosaurs had been found and some were far more distantly related to birds, while all that were close to bird had evidence of feathers. Therefore evolution predicted that orinthosaurs also had feathers. And then a few years ago three species were found with feather impressions. Evolutions predictive power is what makes the fossil record powerful direct evidence
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Reply
#30
RE: The fossil record is the claim not the evidence
And what makes it powerful direct evidence is the inerpretation of the evidence.
"The reason things will never get better is because people keep electing these rich cocksuckers who don't give a shit about you."
-George Carlin
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 6344 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 3912 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  If theists understood "evidence" Foxaèr 135 13319 October 10, 2018 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Moses parting the sea evidence or just made up Smain 12 2872 June 28, 2018 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why do some believers claim that all religions are just as good? Der/die AtheistIn 22 3692 June 25, 2018 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  The Best Evidence For God and Against God The Joker 49 9459 November 22, 2016 at 2:28 pm
Last Post: Asmodee
  Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God) ProgrammingGodJordan 324 48056 November 22, 2016 at 10:44 am
Last Post: Chas
  What gives a religion the right to claim their fantasy is correct and the rest false? Casca 62 6158 November 20, 2016 at 4:53 pm
Last Post: Faith No More
  Someone, Show me Evidence of God. ScienceAf 85 11234 September 12, 2016 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Please give me evidence for God. Socratic Meth Head 142 21377 March 23, 2016 at 5:38 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)