|
Intelligent Design: Did you design yourself?
|
 (May 28, 2014 at 9:08 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Based on a sample size of exactly one laboratory-created bacterium that we not only know was deliberately designed, but we also know the identities of the designers? The claim made was that intelligent design was merely a hypothesis. Just one example of something intelligently designed demolishes that claim. Intelligently designed biological systems exist.....shouldn't students then be taught about intelligent design? 
You're being rather disingenuous and over-literal, I fear. Granted that scientists have created the first artificial genome - that's actually very interesting, I didn't know that. Now connect the dots between that and intelligent design found in nature, which the OP is trying to assert.
As for whether students should be taught about this: sure. Just as long as it is about the scientific achievement and not used to shoehorn creationism into science classes.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Intelligent Design: Did you design yourself?
May 28, 2014 at 9:25 pm
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2014 at 9:27 pm by Artur Axmann.)
it is a mathematical impossibility for the universe to be the way it is without external interference.
The universe ,in its construction ,reveals the the laws of mathematics and these laws can be calculated and diagrammed by physicists. This implies an intelligence in creation and underpins I.D. theory. RE: Intelligent Design: Did you design yourself?
May 28, 2014 at 9:27 pm
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2014 at 9:28 pm by Heywood.)
(May 28, 2014 at 9:22 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You're being rather disingenuous and over-literal, I fear. Granted that scientists have created the first artificial genome - that's actually very interesting, I didn't know that. Now connect the dots between that and intelligent design found in nature, which the OP is trying to assert. Would you have a problem teaching students that there are two known mechanisms which explain the existence of biological systems, evolution and intelligent design?
Found in nature? Yes I would.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
 (May 28, 2014 at 9:15 pm)Heywood Wrote:(May 28, 2014 at 9:08 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Based on a sample size of exactly one laboratory-created bacterium that we not only know was deliberately designed, but we also know the identities of the designers? Not in the way creationists want it taught, no.
Dying to live, living to die.
RE: Intelligent Design: Did you design yourself?
May 28, 2014 at 9:38 pm
(This post was last modified: May 28, 2014 at 9:42 pm by Heywood.)
(May 28, 2014 at 9:28 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Found in nature? Yes I would. Genetically modified corn is now found in nature. Intelligent design has been demonstrated. Some scientist believe the flagellum of certain bacteria are designed. The general consensus though is that it evolved.....however it has never actually been shown that it did evolve. (May 28, 2014 at 9:35 pm)Beccs Wrote:(May 28, 2014 at 9:15 pm)Heywood Wrote: The claim made was that intelligent design was merely a hypothesis. Just one example of something intelligently designed demolishes that claim. But atheists don't want it taught at all...when it is a fact of reality.
Heywood, you know exactly what I mean. When I say "found in nature", I'm referring to something that scientists had nothing to do with.
And the bacterial flagellum? Seriously? Do you honestly think we've never heard of that before?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(May 28, 2014 at 9:25 pm)Artur Axmann Wrote: it is a mathematical impossibility for the universe to be the way it is without external interference. "it is a mathematical impossibility for the universe to be the way it is without external interference. " Utter bullshit. It's mathematically improbable that molecules will line up to create a rock, yet they do. "The universe ,in its construction ,reveals the the laws of mathematics and these laws can be calculated and diagrammed by physicists." Yes, and there is much we still don't understand. This doesn't mean "goddidit" "This implies an intelligence in creation and underpins I.D. theory." Only to the uneducated and those who advocate ID. Also, ID is not a theory. It's a claim
Dying to live, living to die.
I have asked about the prostate and God's sexual taboos on several occasions, and not to be funny. Why can no theist ever answer this question?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
