Current time: 1st August 2010, 06:47
![[-]](images/collapse.gif "[-]")
Alternatively, why not
a specific amount?
|
Brief Introduction - (Go to last post)
|
|
7th February 2010, 06:27
(This post was last modified: 7th February 2010 06:28 by David Henson.)
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Brief Introduction | |||
|
|
7th February 2010, 17:14
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Brief Introduction
(6th February 2010 16:25)David Henson Wrote: This is just a brief introduction rather than a statement of belief up for debate.Now I know who you *really* are I should welcome you again. Hello again Daystar! How have you been? Hold on one second....*reaches for ban button*....*click*...Ok! Glad to see you again! "The argument was not bullshit, it was circular." - Edward, Christian Fundamentalist
The Atheist Blogger (My Blog) -- @ah8r (My Twitter)     |
|||
|
|||
Kudos given by (3): Amphora, Saerules, EvidenceVsFaith |
|
7th February 2010, 23:10
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Brief Introduction
conclusive evidence he was a formerly banned individual? Why was daystar banned?
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
"A lot of people are unwilling to acknowledge anything that contradicts their worldview. So telling them that it's false doesn't necessarily slow them down. That's how urban legends get started for the most case. Like the woman who supposedly put her poodle in the microwave to dry it off. And it exploded." David Mikkelson (snopes) |
|||
|
|
|
7th February 2010, 23:26
Post: #14
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Brief Introduction
(7th February 2010 23:10)tackattack Wrote: conclusive evidence he was a formerly banned individual? Why was daystar banned?http://atheistforums.org/hos.php He was our first. *sniff* Oh the memories... "The argument was not bullshit, it was circular." - Edward, Christian Fundamentalist
The Atheist Blogger (My Blog) -- @ah8r (My Twitter) |
|||
|
|
|
8th February 2010, 02:51
Post: #15
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Brief Introduction
So I'm sure there was conclusive evidencefor the ban, I saw nothing in his current posts that depicted that individual. Sounds like there's a lot of emotional baggage with this one.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
"A lot of people are unwilling to acknowledge anything that contradicts their worldview. So telling them that it's false doesn't necessarily slow them down. That's how urban legends get started for the most case. Like the woman who supposedly put her poodle in the microwave to dry it off. And it exploded." David Mikkelson (snopes) |
|||
|
|
|
8th February 2010, 03:28
Post: #16
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Brief Introduction
You didn't see anything because he was being sneaky, as he was last time around. However if you looked at his profile page (before we deleted its content of course) you would have found a link back to his website, which he created the last time he was here. His signature also contained the words "The Pathway Machine" which was the name of some forum he made after being kicked out of this one.
"The argument was not bullshit, it was circular." - Edward, Christian Fundamentalist
The Atheist Blogger (My Blog) -- @ah8r (My Twitter) |
|||
|
|
|
|