Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 8:29 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
#31
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
(November 29, 2014 at 10:54 am)Heywood Wrote: Thinking about many worlds can drive you forking insane.
But which forking one of you?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#32
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
(November 29, 2014 at 10:53 am)Rhythm Wrote: (I wonder how many jokes we could get out of this..if we really put our minds to it?)

I came up with eight and I wasn't even trying.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#33
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
Heywood,

I'd be careful saying that many worlds and quantum can explain anything. If you're doing science, and suddenly something apparently very unlikely happens, you can't point to many worlds to explain it. The probability that you would observe such a thing is the same, many worlds or not, it's not evidence one way or the other, and it's not more likely. In connection with the anthropic principle on the other hand, you may have an explanation of sorts for certain things concerning our origin.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#34
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
Stimbo, I almost missed your crack (these posts go fast). That was REALLY good.
I liked it a lot.
You make it worth while to come here often. Thanks.
Reply
#35
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
The pleasure was all mine.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#36
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
(November 29, 2014 at 1:56 am)Alex K Wrote: Surgenator,

It's not really an additional multiplying of particles. The MWI amounts to basically just taking what the Schrödinger equation gives you and running with it. The quantum superpositions of the observer which automatically occur when it is included in the qm state along with the measured system,already give you the many worlds from your perspective. Copenhagen tells you to artificially deviate from Schroedinger after a measurement and project this down to one of the observer states in the superposition. So in a sense its less parsimonious than MWI.

There a two issues with that, how to assign probabilities to the superpositions, and whether some states should be special, but those are technical details.

In this picture, the usual observed quantum interference, eg in the double slit, precisely *is* interference between universes. Interference between very dissimilar universes is ultra suppressed afaik because the wave functions have little overlap.

I'm still having trouble wrapping my head around it. Is there a collapse of the wave function? If there isn't, then we are one solution of enourmous superposition function. How the fuck do you assign a probability if you have to worry about other superposition states your not in interfering with yours? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH This is why I'm an experimentalist.
Reply
#37
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
(November 29, 2014 at 1:54 pm)Surgenator Wrote:
(November 29, 2014 at 1:56 am)Alex K Wrote: Surgenator,

It's not really an additional multiplying of particles. The MWI amounts to basically just taking what the Schrödinger equation gives you and running with it. The quantum superpositions of the observer which automatically occur when it is included in the qm state along with the measured system,already give you the many worlds from your perspective. Copenhagen tells you to artificially deviate from Schroedinger after a measurement and project this down to one of the observer states in the superposition. So in a sense its less parsimonious than MWI.

There a two issues with that, how to assign probabilities to the superpositions, and whether some states should be special, but those are technical details.

In this picture, the usual observed quantum interference, eg in the double slit, precisely *is* interference between universes. Interference between very dissimilar universes is ultra suppressed afaik because the wave functions have little overlap.

I'm still having trouble wrapping my head around it. Is there a collapse of the wave function? If there isn't, then we are one solution of enourmous superposition function. How the fuck do you assign a probability if you have to worry about other superposition states your not in interfering with yours? AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH This is why I'm an experimentalist.

I can't claim to have full understanding here as I'm a measly high energy theorist by training, not a quantum mechanic Big Grin

My super simple toy example which I told Pickup a few weeks or months ago is like this:

You, the observer, have the three mood states | Smile >, | :| >, | Sad >
and the cat has the states | 8- >, | X- >

The Schrödingers cat system starts out with the tensor product state

Psi1 = 1/sqrt(2) | :| > * ( | 8- > + | X- > )

where your mood is sharp and neutral and the cat is in the superposition dead-alive. Your measurement of looking in the box yields a correlation between your mood state and the cat state, so after the interaction we have

Psi2 = 1/sqrt2 | Smile > * | 8- > + 1/sqrt2 | Sad > * | X- >

So far we have only used the Schrödinger equation for the unitary time evolution from Psi1 to Psi2, no collapse.

In Copenhagen, you would discard one of those halves of the superposition, in MWI, you keep the new state as is. The universe is now a superposition of you happy and cat alive, and you unhappy and cat dead. Those are the two worlds. At no point was there the need to artifically double anything. The prefactors squared give you the propabilities in both cases, i.e. 1/2.

You could recover the copenhagen states corresponding to the two outcomes by projecting e.g. onto your happy state using the operator

| Smile >< Smile | * 1

Of course in this simple 6 state system, there are not enough degrees of freedom to have decoherence, that is implicit in this overly simplistic example. There are some issues as to which states systems decohere to and why, and how to properly define probabilities in these states, which are not at all trivial.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#38
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
Again, MWI implies a lot, but none of any of its implications that could actually be tested is unique to MWI.
Reply
#39
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
(November 29, 2014 at 2:08 pm)Chuck Wrote: Again, MWI implies a lot, but none of any of its implications that could actually be tested is unique to MWI.

I'd say you're right. Nothing that can be tested objectively and communicated to another person, i.e. there does not seem to be a empirical distinction.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#40
RE: Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better
(November 28, 2014 at 9:50 pm)professor Wrote: The Multi Universe was invented as another scheme to justify the belief that this place is not unique. Good luck on that one.

These forums need the capacity to give negative rep, or at least to thumbs down stupid posts. Just saying.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Does the fact that many non-human animals have pituitary disprove Cartesian Dualism? FlatAssembler 36 1988 June 23, 2023 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why is murder wrong if Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is true? FlatAssembler 52 3739 August 7, 2022 at 8:51 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  If people were 100% rational, would the world be better? vulcanlogician 188 22006 August 30, 2021 at 4:37 pm
Last Post: vulcanlogician
  [Serious] Moral Obligations toward Possible Worlds Neo-Scholastic 93 5301 May 23, 2021 at 1:43 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  How many holes does a straw have? ignoramus 57 3135 August 19, 2018 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Argument from "better to seek proper vision". Mystic 53 5833 October 25, 2017 at 1:13 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  "What is the Lord of the Worlds?" Mystic 40 3852 October 1, 2017 at 7:12 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Trying to simplify my Consciousness hypothesis Won2blv 83 13546 February 21, 2017 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Strong desire to understand. Edwardo Piet 15 2697 September 14, 2016 at 4:37 am
Last Post: Athene
  Is world better without Saddam? TrueChristian 90 11614 December 31, 2015 at 1:59 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)