Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 23, 2024, 4:15 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
#11
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
If you open a Bible today, you see books titled 'The Gospel according to Matthew,' 'The Gospel according to Mark,' and so on for Luke and John.

In fact, the Gospels are all anonymous - they don't actually say who wrote them. But:

The names of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were linked with them as their authors right from the very earliest days
No other authors were ever suggested for them
There are thousands of Greek manuscripts of the Gospels, and they all give them the same authors

Why a historical Jesus never existed

There is no contemporary historical record of any kind of Jesus!! No written Roman, Greek or Jewish sources from this time (apart from the gospels) know of any historical Jesus or Christ. The name "Christ" is mentioned in some later texts (Tacitus, Suetonius Pliny d.y.) but then merely as the name of the idol of the Christians' worship (Read what these sources really say here). We don't even know who the writers of the Gospels were, and don't have the original manuscripts themselves either. We just have later copies of copies of copies of copies … of copies of the assumed lost originals. And with each copy the copyist usually felt free to alter details or rewrite whole parts of the manuscript. (We usually don't trust dubious anonymous sources as evidence for anything, do we?)

All the divine aspects of the Jesus figure are "stolen" from earlier similar dying and resurrected godmen, such as Dionysos, Osiris, Hercules, Attis, Mithra, Horus, Zarathustra and others. Actually there are few (if any) things about Jesus that are original at all. Jesus is just the Jewish version of this popular mythic Saviour- character in the Mystery-religions of Antiquity. (See the similarities here).

All the teachings of Jesus are "borrowed" from older sources, for example from the teachings of Buddha. Many of Jesus teachings are almost word for word identical with some of Buddhas sayings (400 years earlier). The so-called "Golden rule" can be found in several earlier pagan Greek (and Jewish) texts. The famous "Sermon on the Mount" was never held by Jesus (of course, since he never existed), but also because it was actually first produced in the second century AD by Christian priests, assembled from what they assumed were sayings of Jesus in different other texts.

The "birthday" of Jesus is of course unknown, not even the year of his miraculous birth is known. The church just stole the already popular date of the 25th December, which in Antiquity was an immensely popular celebration of the birth of the sungod Mithra, - "the light of the world".
More on the origin of Christmas - http://realtruth.org/articles/169-ttooc.html <- celebrate that day every year and if there is a god your going to hell for celebration on a pegan holiday.

The story of Jesus was originally an allegorical story based partly on the Jewish exodus myth and Joshua/Jesus ben Nun, successor of Moses, the Jewish Messiah-myth and the widespread pagan myth of the dying and resurrected godman Dionysos-Osiris. Later uneducated Christians in Rome, people without the insight and understanding of the deeper meaning of the texts, started to take these allegorical stories for their face value, and Literary Christianity as we know it was born.

Done Done Done

C-C-C-Combo broke this thread.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
#12
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
Snacks
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#13
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
Quote:and I can shovel in even more evidence for Jesus

The operative word there being "shovel."

[Image: shit%2Bshovel.jpg]
Reply
#14
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
[out of character]
We interrupt this presentation of the overwhelming evidence for the resurrection of Jesus to bring you this clip that I reminded myself of when I asked "what part of this progression escapes you?"





Star Trek sucks. Babylon 5 rules!
[/out of character]

(November 30, 2014 at 1:20 am)dyresand Wrote: ...

Lalala
"You don't need facts when you got Jesus." -Pastor Deacon Fred, Landover Baptist Church

™: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians ™ because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to. 

And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:  Wink
Reply
#15
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
(November 30, 2014 at 1:47 am)YahwehIsTheWay Wrote: Star Trek sucks. Babylon 5 rules!

Repent! NOW!!!
Reply
#16
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
Errrrrrrhhhmmmm...

What is the point of this?

As I said in the other thread, even if you could somehow prove beyond reasonable doubt that some guy was declared dead and later came to life, all you have is an unexplained phenomenon. You don't get to shoehorn in your own unsupported explanation as fact because none currently exist. "How else could it have happened?" is an argument from ignorance/incredulity and is a fallacy.

In fact, with text all you can prove is what people believed happened, at best. It does not tell you what actually happened. Especially when the people at that time were already surrounded with mythology and had no good science to explain stuff.

If you use faith as an answer, you have admitted you have no good reason or argument. Believing in something doesn't make it true. I think we could all demonstrate that pretty easily.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#17
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
8. Liar, Lord or Lunatic?

What do you get when you start with a preconceived notion, throw it in a pot, toss in two caricatured alternatives presented in a false trilemma, mix in some strawmanning, sprinkle a dash of argument from incredulity, flavor with cherry picked Bible verses and stir over a roaring fire of confirmation bias?

You have the perfect recipe for the Trilemma, C.S. Lewis' classic argument for the divinity of Jesus. Enjoy the video of his argument presented in his words with the Mel Gibson BDSM gay-porn flick in the background.





The argument is simple: Jesus said he was God.

Sort of.

Well, he did say that his will was inferior to God's ("Not my will but thy will be done"). And he did say he didn't have the knowledge of God ("No man knows the day, no not even the Son, but the Father only"). And he did speak to God in 2nd person and about him in 3rd, as did the booming voice from the sky when speaking to him ("This is my son, hear ye him"). And he did say that his morality was inferior to God's ("Why do you call me good? There is no one good but God.")

But see, all that is when Jesus is fully human. He's also fully divine, which is when he's forgiving sins. The Trinity is the way of having it both ways, which works to smooth out the rough spots of the story.

Anyway, I digress. If Jesus is going around forgiving sins, that means he's either a "demon" as Josh McDowell put it, he's insane along the lines of claiming to "be a poached egg" as C.S. Lewis puts it or he's The Lord.

Now, we all know that anyone claiming to be God must be a demon right? No possibility that, just to spitball out a possibility, that Jesus was picked as Messiah of the week, at first saw an opportunity for his own gain, then his idealistic side kicked in and he thought he could reform an austere religion and make it more gentle and loving for the people, right?





I wonder if Josh McDowell would call Miguel a "demon"?

The other possibility, at least the only one we allow for, is that Jesus was crazy. And we all know that crazy people never get a religious following or get taken seriously as religious leaders, right?

And if Jesus was crazy, how could he have had the sanity to stand in front of a fig tree when figs were out of season and then curse the tree for not bearing fruit? If Jesus was crazy, how could he have been wise enough to use bloody metaphors in his sermon on the mount about cutting your hands off or plucking your own eyes out of they offend you, metaphors taken tragically too literally on occasion. And if Jesus were not completely grounded, how could he give such advice as "love your enemies" and "do good to those who hate you" while condemning any who don't believe in him to eternal Hell?

Clearly, anyone who reads the Gospel accounts must come to the conclusion that Jesus is not crazy nor is he lying but that he must be Lord. After all, why would we not get a complete and clear picture from such credible sources as religious texts?

...Let's see if there's any other arguments I missed...
"You don't need facts when you got Jesus." -Pastor Deacon Fred, Landover Baptist Church

™: True Christian is a Trademark of the Landover Baptist Church. I have no affiliation with this fine group of True Christians ™ because I can't afford their tithing requirements but would like to be. Maybe someday the Lord will bless me with enough riches that I am able to. 

And for the lovers of Poe, here's your winking smiley:  Wink
Reply
#18
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
Appeals to incredulity, logical fallacy.

The thing is (borrowing from Matt Dillahunty) no one actually believes because of any of these arguments. They already believe for other reasons, and use them as rationalisations. I would find it hard to believe a single sane person was ever convinced to believe, without coercion, by any of this.

(Yes, indoctrination is coercion as well as child abuse. If you are for real here, you are almost certainly a victim of it, and for that I am sorry.)
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#19
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
Dude, not fair!
We want his majesty to present these things!
Take all of that back!
Reply
#20
RE: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Deux)
I recommend people to read the OP signature.

Hilarious
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 50 1782 January 9, 2024 at 4:28 am
Last Post: no one
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 4014 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 7861 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 3027 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 3139 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1389 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 3332 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 2742 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian? KUSA 371 88887 May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 14866 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)