Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 4:15 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2014 at 4:16 am by robvalue.)
People seem to have no idea that the whole scientific process is full of people who know what they are doing, trying their hardest to poke holes in your work. If they can't do it, Jo Numnuts off the street isn't going to.
Posts: 591
Threads: 13
Joined: July 7, 2014
Reputation:
14
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 8:07 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2014 at 8:08 am by Natachan.)
So I went and looked up this whackadoodle. Turns out he's put out a couple self-published books. He tours taking about creationism. His arguments are vapid and free of content, even for a creationist. "Off each day in creation was millions of years and god rested on the seventh day, that too would have been millions of years. Therefore each day was a 24 hour day."
I shit not, they're that bad.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 10:11 am
(December 8, 2014 at 3:07 am)Alex K Wrote: He's a literalist, but he says whether or not one is, is not a "salvation issue". I'm relieved.
Hmm, a Literalist blasphemer. First time I've encountered one of those. Weird, like the entire point of Literalism is the absolute GUARANTY of Salvation, but then he fucks it up and blasphemes the Lawd.
What a fucktard !!!
He is going to have an especially rough time acclimatizing to ETERNAL and ENDLESS torment in Hell.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 10:25 am
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2014 at 10:26 am by Alex K.)
(December 8, 2014 at 10:11 am)vorlon13 Wrote: Hmm, a Literalist blasphemer. First time I've encountered one of those. Weird, like the entire point of Literalism is the absolute GUARANTY of Salvation, but then he fucks it up and blasphemes the Lawd.
From the Interview:
Quote:“I’m not saying this is a salvation issue,” Malone stated, “but I am saying if you aren’t willing to accept the Bible in a clear, straightforward way, you’re certainly undermining some of the very basic doctrines of Christianity.”
Lol. Translation: Sure, you're completely undermining the basic doctrines of Christianity, but I asked Jesus and he's cool with it.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 13051
Threads: 66
Joined: February 7, 2011
Reputation:
92
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 10:30 am
(December 8, 2014 at 3:52 am)Astrogod07 Wrote: I look forward to seeing the author accept his nobel prize for showing through rigorous research that the theory of Evolution is wrong. It will be an historic occasion! I'm sure this will be totally different from all those other books that have offered similar "proof" Curious, though that he would choose to publish his findings in a book rather than submitting his work for peer review. It must be because all those unscrupulous god-hating evolutionists would never let his research be published.
And there's not as much money in peer review.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Posts: 455
Threads: 14
Joined: December 2, 2014
Reputation:
21
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 10:34 am
Malone's book is published by Search for the Truth Publications, fine purveyors of regurgitated Christian pseudo-history.
I'm thinking about getting it so I can utterly destroy it on Amazon reviews.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 10:36 am
(December 8, 2014 at 10:34 am)Strider Wrote: Malone's book is published by Search for the Truth Publications, fine purveyors of regurgitated Christian pseudo-history.
I'm thinking about getting it so I can utterly destroy it on Amazon reviews.
So far it has two 5-* reviews - so for 12 Bucks you can still can make a noticeable difference 
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 11:11 am
(December 8, 2014 at 10:25 am)Alex K Wrote: (December 8, 2014 at 10:11 am)vorlon13 Wrote: Hmm, a Literalist blasphemer. First time I've encountered one of those. Weird, like the entire point of Literalism is the absolute GUARANTY of Salvation, but then he fucks it up and blasphemes the Lawd.
From the Interview:
Quote:“I’m not saying this is a salvation issue,” Malone stated, “but I am saying if you aren’t willing to accept the Bible in a clear, straightforward way, you’re certainly undermining some of the very basic doctrines of Christianity.”
Lol. Translation: Sure, you're completely undermining the basic doctrines of Christianity, but I asked Jesus and he's cool with it.
Not so much asking Jesus, but rather telling Jesus how things are going to work.
And they say atheists are arrogant.
Posts: 1121
Threads: 53
Joined: February 5, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 8, 2014 at 12:07 pm
(December 7, 2014 at 9:30 pm)Kitanetos Wrote: Quote:A new book released last month reveals the accuracy of the Bible’s historical accounts and spotlights several recent findings that contradict the evolutionary time-frame.
http://christiannews.net/2014/12/01/new-...-timeline/
"explores the timeline of world history through a biblical worldview."
This quote from the blurb on that site says it all.
Roughly translated means,
"this individual who has no relevant academic qualifications for historical research (he's a chemical engineer - who clearly spent too much time working with volatile substances) went out of his way to find disregarded crap that did not pass peer review to fit his cuckoo bullshit theory and pass it off as 'genuine research', which he wouldn't recognise even if it dangled naked in front of him singing 'I am genuine research'... "
MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci
"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
RE: New book validates biblical history?
December 9, 2014 at 3:58 pm
(December 7, 2014 at 9:30 pm)Sionnach Wrote: Quote:A new book released last month reveals the accuracy of the Bible’s historical accounts and spotlights several recent findings that contradict the evolutionary time-frame.
http://christiannews.net/2014/12/01/new-...-timeline/
i know i have an idea lets make money off of peoples ignorance and sell it publish and have people worship us all in all we won't say for a fact we are atheists who are trying to get a good laugh in.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
|
