Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 8:57 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If morality is subjective...
#21
RE: If morality is subjective...
Accepting an objective moral standard makes you entirely amoral. You are without morals. You blindly do what you are told, ignoring your own observations about the help or hindrance of your actions upon others.

And no theists do this anyway. They cherry pick, the honest ones will admit this. But even if they didn't, the usual books are so filled with contradictions that you can't follow it all consistently, it's impossible. So you end up making choices about how to resolve these problems, hence you're making your own moral judgement.

Proper morality is pretty easy to grasp for anyone who understands what helps someone and what hurts them. There are very few people who could honestly claim they have no idea. To throw all your empathy, reasoning and even gut instincts away to adhere to an arbitrary "rule" that everything about you tells you is wrong, is... wrong. The only reason to behave this way is out of fear. Like someone has a gun to your head, or your loved ones. Of course, this is exactly the case with religion. God holds your soul hostage while you dance to his arbitrary tune. Or rather, what people tell you is his tune. And they can't even remotely agree what that tune is.

Only a sociopath could truly say that they think all subjective "morality" is equally valid. It's a desperate theist rationalization. Secular society has laws, but it doesn't dictate morality down to the letter like religion, so that is another false equivocation that's often made. Also, theists would want the law to be upheld, even against people acting in accordance to the holy book they worship.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#22
RE: If morality is subjective...
(January 26, 2015 at 5:07 pm)Dystopia Wrote: Then how do we answer the theist argument - If there are no objective or absolute moral standards then every individual's moral spectrum is equally valid, and therefore practices, actions and habits like murder, sex assault, violence, mutilation, torture...[the list goes on] should be perfectly acceptable and not censored in human societies.

[I'm sorry if the answer is obvious but I don't know how to refute this one]

The conclusion does not follow because it is itself a moral judgement. If morality is subjective, then there is no reason to accept the claim that all actions are perfectly acceptable and should not be censored. That someone accepts that idea does not entail the idea that I should, if morality is subjective.

The idea that every action is acceptable (and should be to everyone) is an absolute moral judgment, which is rejected by the premise.


It is also worth mentioning that the idea that morality is subjective is neither entailed by atheism, nor is it necessarily rejected by theism. A theist may, for example, assert that morality is subjective, but you had better go along with god's ideas or he will do things to you that you would rather not have done.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
#23
RE: If morality is subjective...
why do people constantly confuse morality with legality. Morality is the system of what we should and and should not do and it IS subjective to each of us and the born from the society we came from. Of course we Can judge each other's moralities and actions. That's our each individual right.
Legality is what you Must or must not do and comes from the social contract we have with each other in the form of our governance to achieve and maintain our defined society. These laws may or may not be moral. There are plenty of examples of immoral actions that are legal and even of moral actions that are illegal. Even more so since there are varied definitions of morality.
Long story short morality |= legality
Reply
#24
RE: If morality is subjective...
(January 26, 2015 at 8:49 pm)rasetsu Wrote: Morality is contingent, but not subjective. It depends on things like human nature, and the family and community we learn our morality from. If I grow up in a racist family, there's a good chance I will end up racist, too. That's a contingency; I didn't decide that I would have that influence on my morality, nor do I really have much say in how I react to that environment, whether I rebel or not, it's a matter of contingent factors in my life. Morality is part human nature and part inheritance. If I grew up in a country where racism was accepted, I would develop a different morality than if I grew up in a country that abhorred racism. It's contingent, not subjective.

One can choose one's morality. My mother was raised in Texas in the 50s, and raised to be racist, but she made a conscious decision to not buy into that crap.

I agree that sociocultural norms play a big role, but at the same time, they aren't cast in metal. After all, many of us here were raised -- which is another way to say programmed -- to believe in the god of the Bible, and yet we were able to think our way through that programming.

I think that morality is both subjective, and relative.

(January 27, 2015 at 12:20 am)Dystopia Wrote:
(January 27, 2015 at 12:14 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: "What makes you think a morality based on your faith is objective?"

Arguing from the POV of a theist - Since God exists, then moral values commanded by Him are undeniable and absolute - Therefore objective

Given the fact that those values aren't abstractions which can be justified on their own terms, they aren't absolute; they're relative. And because whether or not you should practice them depends on your point of view, they aren't objective.

Reply
#25
RE: If morality is subjective...
(January 26, 2015 at 5:07 pm)Dystopia Wrote: Then how do we answer the theist argument - If there are no objective or absolute moral standards then every individual's moral spectrum is equally valid, and therefore practices, actions and habits like murder, sex assault, violence, mutilation, torture...[the list goes on] should be perfectly acceptable and not censored in human societies.

[I'm sorry if the answer is obvious but I don't know how to refute this one]

I've said it many times before.

"Subjective" does not mean "all opinions are equal".

Some subjective evaluations are based on evidence, including objective data, are supported by logical arguments and internally consistent. Other subjective evaluations are based only on the bare assertions of the people making them. Therefore, some subjective evaluations are stronger than others.

If this were not so, every court case would end with a hung jury because, gee whiz, the prosecution says "guilty" and the defense says "not guilty" and who can say who's opinion is right or wrong?

Morality is "subjective" because we can't plug numbers into a spreadsheet and determine what is right or wrong. The fact that we say "moral judgment" and "moral values" tacitly admits morality is a subjective evaluation, since "objective" by definition means "free from personal judgment, values or opinions".

How would "objective" morality even work? Can morality be measured by units of measure like temperature, velocity or mass? No. We debate what is "right" or "wrong" by philosophical arguments, not scientific study.

All this ignores that the whole argument is a fallacious "appeal to consequence". If you believe that without a god, there is no morality, that would not make God real. Just because you don't want something to be true doesn't mean that it isn't. The universe doesn't care what you want to be true.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
#26
RE: If morality is subjective...
(January 26, 2015 at 5:07 pm)Dystopia Wrote: Then how do we answer the theist argument - If there are no objective or absolute moral standards then every individual's moral spectrum is equally valid, and therefore practices, actions and habits like murder, sex assault, violence, mutilation, torture...[the list goes on] should be perfectly acceptable and not censored in human societies.

[I'm sorry if the answer is obvious but I don't know how to refute this one]
Because morals come from what people dislike. We don't like killing, and have no reason to violate others' dislike of dying.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Beauty, Morality, God, and a Table FrustratedFool 23 1755 October 8, 2023 at 1:35 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Is Moral Nihilism a Morality? vulcanlogician 140 10147 July 17, 2019 at 11:50 am
Last Post: DLJ
  Subjective Morality? mfigurski80 450 34878 January 13, 2019 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Acrobat
  Law versus morality robvalue 16 1327 September 2, 2018 at 7:39 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Objective morality: how would it affect your judgement/actions? robvalue 42 8219 May 5, 2018 at 5:07 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
  dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality Mystic 18 3501 May 3, 2018 at 10:28 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  Can somebody give me a good argument in favor of objective morality? Aegon 19 4407 March 14, 2018 at 6:42 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Morality WinterHold 24 2791 November 1, 2017 at 1:36 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Subjective Issues Azu 13 2354 September 26, 2017 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Astonished
  What is morality? Mystic 48 6895 September 3, 2017 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)