Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 23, 2024, 11:18 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
#21
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
(February 18, 2015 at 6:47 pm)Alex K Wrote: It confuses me slightly that you first say there is no reason to believe sth and then claim to withold judgment. To me that is judgment.


To have no reason to believe something does not entail having a reason to believe its opposite. For example, I have no reason to believe you are presently wearing a cotton shirt. And likewise, I have no reason to believe that you are not presently wearing a cotton shirt. So I withhold judgement on whether you are presently wearing a cotton shirt or not.

Now, there is a judgement involved in this, but it is about my lack of evidence for either position. It is because I lack evidence one way or the other that I refrain from taking a position one way or the other.

For it to be reasonable for me to take a position one way or the other, I would need evidence for it. But lacking evidence for something does not, by itself, properly lead to rejecting something as false.


(February 18, 2015 at 6:47 pm)Alex K Wrote: But anyways, before we go on - do we have a working definition of what constitutes an explanation?

I don't think so.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
#22
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
But I'd say in general, the OP proposition fails to infinite regression. Given any framework (e.g. space time), I can ask "in what framework does it exist?" Many will call the question nonsensical-- but that's just because it's apparent the question is unanswerable from within space-time.
Reply
#23
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
(February 18, 2015 at 3:54 pm)Pizz-atheist Wrote: 1. Does everything have an explanation?
Yes, we just may never know.
Quote:2. Does everything have a cause?
IMHO, no. In fact, IMHO, nothing has a cause.

(February 18, 2015 at 6:41 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Not everything has a cause. Only those things that come into or go out of being, i.e. anything subject to change.
Gravity 'causes' things to fall. What went in or out of being?
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
#24
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
Define cause and explanation.

1 - Probably yes, but we may not know right now what it is. Many things that were once unexplainable are now common sense. I still don't know what you mean by explanation here

2 - I doubt it - But most circumstances do have a cause, I just can't say for certain than everything needs a cause because that signifies complete infinite regression.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you

Reply
#25
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
(February 18, 2015 at 7:38 pm)IATIA Wrote: Yes, we just may never know.
Quote:2. Does everything have a cause?
IMHO, no. In fact, IMHO, nothing has a cause.

Interesting answer. Explain?
Reply
#26
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
(February 18, 2015 at 3:54 pm)Pizz-atheist Wrote:

[succinct]
1. Arguably, probably
2. Arguably, probably
[/succinct]
Sum ergo sum
Reply
#27
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
(February 18, 2015 at 8:00 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Interesting answer. Explain?
Causality leads to infinite regression or 'first cause'. Neither of which I find acceptable. Infinite regression should be a moot point by now, so no need to elaborate.

First cause has a similar issue. What was before the first cause? If one uses the "god always was" claim, we still have infinite regression in what was god's first thought and what was before god's first thought? The escape from that is "god exists out of time." That does not work either, because there must be a sequence of events from god and no universe to the beginning of the universe. We have causality again and infinite regression again.

More acceptable is that everything just is. Within our puny little brains, we have created time and causality to account for everyday perceptions, but this does not envelope the big picture at all.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
#28
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
(February 18, 2015 at 6:54 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:
(February 18, 2015 at 6:47 pm)Alex K Wrote: But anyways, before we go on - do we have a working definition of what constitutes an explanation?

I don't think so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explanation
"An explanation is a set of statements constructed to describe a set of facts which clarifies the causes, context, and consequences of those facts."
I hope that helps.

(February 18, 2015 at 7:34 pm)bennyboy Wrote: But I'd say in general, the OP proposition fails to infinite regression. Given any framework (e.g. space time), I can ask "in what framework does it exist?" Many will call the question nonsensical-- but that's just because it's apparent the question is unanswerable from within space-time.
What's so bad about an infinite regression?
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
#29
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
(February 18, 2015 at 9:15 pm)Pizz-atheist Wrote:
(February 18, 2015 at 6:54 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: I don't think so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explanation
"An explanation is a set of statements constructed to describe a set of facts which clarifies the causes, context, and consequences of those facts."
I hope that helps.
...

In that case, there probably isn't an explanation for everything. Seriously, do you think that, for everything, there is a set of statements that clarifies the causes, context, and consequences of those facts?

A lot of things are unknown, which does not seem compatible with the idea that for everything there is a set of statements that clarifies the causes, context, and consequences of those facts.

If you disagree, go ahead, explain everything to me. I'm waiting.


Edited to add:

With that idea of "explanation," everything must have a cause or causes in order for everything to have an explanation, since "explanation," among other things, clarifies the causes of things. One cannot clarify causes if they do not exist.

"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
#30
RE: "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion.
(February 18, 2015 at 3:54 pm)Pizz-atheist Wrote: I have two related questions:
1. Does everything have an explanation?
2. Does everything have a cause?

1) everything that can be understood has an explanation, and each of those explanations are subject to being wrong.
2) of those things, a cause is a rudimentary part of any explanatory theory and it too is subject to being shown false.

1) Do chickens come from eggs?
2) Did every chicken come from an egg?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving the Existence of a First Cause Muhammad Rizvi 3 768 June 23, 2023 at 5:50 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  [Serious] Existential Inertia vs. Sustaining First Cause GrandizerII 8 1141 August 24, 2020 at 2:12 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Peterson's 12 Rules for Life v2.0-- actual book discussion bennyboy 238 17918 October 8, 2018 at 3:20 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Open discussion of the Christian Why We're Here thread Whateverist 598 67226 June 12, 2018 at 6:29 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
  God As Grounding Cause datc 75 9995 May 27, 2018 at 1:14 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  God As Groundhog Cause BrianSoddingBoru4 8 1202 May 26, 2018 at 10:18 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Atheists, I want to know your explanation for these Out of body experiences? arda101 39 5918 January 29, 2017 at 2:57 am
Last Post: Magilla
  Everything is nothing, and nothing is everything. goombah111 64 8682 January 3, 2017 at 3:15 pm
Last Post: goombah111
  Bhagavad Gita First Cause watchamadoodle 4 1339 April 6, 2015 at 8:48 am
Last Post: Mudhammam
  Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty. Esquilax 169 30663 November 16, 2014 at 2:43 am
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)