Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 2:51 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
#21
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
(Popcorn in hand) This is great.
An atheist jumping out of the robot factory.
Reply
#22
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
(March 6, 2015 at 6:33 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: The physics of the JFK assassination imply more than one shooter. The Dallas doctors were of the opinion that the shot was frontal, tracing from the right temple to the occipital lobe. The timing of the shots was too tightly spaced.

The case is not open and shut. Indeed, two federal investigations came to opposite conclusions.

Dude got whacked. Bullets tend to do that to people.
Reply
#23
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
(March 6, 2015 at 6:33 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: The timing of the shots was too tightly spaced.
Amateur mistake.

Say, for round numbers, it takes 2 seconds to get off a round.

That would be:

Work bolt.
Acquire target.
Take aim.
Fire.
BANG.

For three rounds that would be:

Work bolt.
Acquire target.
Take aim.
Fire.
BANG.
Work bolt.
Acquire target.
Take aim.
Fire.
BANG.
Work bolt.
Acquire target.
Take aim.
Fire.
BANG.

HOWEVER, you don't hear anything before the first bang.

BANG.
Work bolt.
Acquire target.
Take aim.
Fire.
BANG.
Work bolt.
Acquire target.
Take aim.
Fire.
BANG.

So, for round numbers, the claim of "six" seconds needed is obviously wrong.

BUT DUMBASSES KEEP BRINGING IT UP.
Reply
#24
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
(March 7, 2015 at 5:39 pm)Gawdzilla Wrote:
(March 6, 2015 at 6:33 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: The timing of the shots was too tightly spaced.
Amateur mistake.




So, for round numbers, the claim of "six" seconds needed is obviously wrong.

BUT DUMBASSES KEEP BRINGING IT UP.

Except that Oswald was not a very skilled shooter. Now, you can call me a dumbass, but I've handled longarms to the extent of shooting expert marksman for the USAF hitting 40 out of 40 stationary targets at 100 yards, on the M-16A1. I've been as close to that window in the TSBD as is permitted nowadays -- about two foot away. I'd be skeptical of my own ability to achieve two hits out of three shots on a moving target under the circumstances pertaining that day.

Three shots in 5.6 seconds. That's 2.8 seconds to execute the entire tasking you've so kindly listed, and this from a guy who, on a Marine Corps range shooting at a stationary target, managed to hit someone else's target entirely.

You didn't mention the oak tree which partially obscured the limousine from Oswald's view, forcing him to reacquire his target -- and bear in mind, his target was not the car, but a head shot.

And, the expert testimony indicated that the mating of the scope and the rifle was flawed:




Oswald, an average shooter (at best!) achieved two hits out of three shots on a moving target with 2.8 seconds between shots on a rifle where the scope cannot be dialed in without shims, according to this testimony. Was Oswald good enough to provide for more than five inches of windage at 80 yards?

I'm skeptical.

I am indeed an amateur shooter, but I'm no dumbass, and if you don't want the same treatment, shitcan it with me, buddy.

Reply
#25
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
(March 8, 2015 at 4:34 am)Parkers Tan Wrote:
(March 7, 2015 at 5:39 pm)Gawdzilla Wrote: Amateur mistake.




So, for round numbers, the claim of "six" seconds needed is obviously wrong.

BUT DUMBASSES KEEP BRINGING IT UP.

Except that Oswald was not a very skilled shooter. Now, you can call me a dumbass, but I've handled longarms to the extent of shooting expert marksman for the USAF hitting 40 out of 40 stationary targets at 100 yards, on the M-16A1. I've been as close to that window in the TSBD as is permitted nowadays -- about two foot away. I'd be skeptical of my own ability to achieve two hits out of three shots on a moving target under the circumstances pertaining that day.

Three shots in 5.6 seconds. That's 2.8 seconds to execute the entire tasking you've so kindly listed, and this from a guy who, on a Marine Corps range shooting at a stationary target, managed to hit someone else's target entirely.

You didn't mention the oak tree which partially obscured the limousine from Oswald's view, forcing him to reacquire his target -- and bear in mind, his target was not the car, but a head shot.

And, the expert testimony indicated that the mating of the scope and the rifle was flawed:




Oswald, an average shooter (at best!) achieved two hits out of three shots on a moving target with 2.8 seconds between shots on a rifle where the scope cannot be dialed in without shims, according to this testimony. Was Oswald good enough to provide for more than five inches of windage at 80 yards?

I'm skeptical.

I am indeed an amateur shooter, but I'm no dumbass, and if you don't want the same treatment, shitcan it with me, buddy.

Drop it Parker, this conspiracy has been debunked over and over.

http://www.cracked.com/article_20466_5-c...ebunk.html

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...ories.html

The stupidest lie sold right after is that the front seat and back seats were the same height. THEY WERE NOT, the back seats were higher which would put Kennedy in line with one bullet which would have as the commission said, killed Kennedy and injured the front seat passenger.

This is the same mass delusion is what causes bad claims to spread like weeds. The JFK conspiracies spread like all others.

Humans are notoriously flawed in there perceptions and bad claims can go on to become popular no matter how false they are. It is why humans also invent religions.

Assuming, mass hysteria, gap filling, gullibility, fear, and unscientific reporting, or fitting bad data to fish for a conclusion you desire., also caused this bullshit in this link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_the_Sun

It is also why, back when I was a kid like today, media still loves preying off the gullibility of society selling crap like Bigfoot. You simply have fallen for a different conspiracy.
Reply
#26
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
Yep, dumbasses.
Reply
#27
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
Just like 9/11 you do not do something like that and get away with it. In both cases you have a diverse government of both parties, diverse law enforcement with members of both parties, vetted secret service whom vote for both parties, multiple law enforcement agencies. Getting away with a group crime of any kind is impossible the more people involved.

Even outside this issue, the mob like Capone certainly got away with crime once and a while, but eventually they nailed him, and while he did pay off people and get away with some things, he still went down. 50 years of this JFK bullshit, if there had been anyone but Oswald involved, there would be no good reason this far after the fact to hide anything.

Buying JFK crap is as bad as claiming Bush or Jews planted explosives in the towers. Oswald was a disturbed individual and the only thing the government did wrong was not have good security in place and allowed Oswald to fall through the cracks, the same way we knew Bin Ladin was a threat under both Clinton and Bush. There was no conspiracy, there were simply bad conditions. If you want to believe something badly enough you will. No different a conspiracy than what leads humans to believe gods exist.
Reply
#28
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
(March 6, 2015 at 8:54 am)Brian37 Wrote: RationalPoet......OP/ED..........NO MH370 DID NOT "Disappear". I really fucking hate humans when there is a lack of an answer as to what happened, jumping to conspiracies and magic. Not finding it only means we have not found it. The parts of the plane and the people on it did not magically evaporate. Just like for a long time we could not find the Titanic. We may never find that plane, but that does not mean it there was a magical supernatural power that made it go away.
You example of the titanic is contradictory to your point. Everyone rejected the possibility that the ship had split in two, because some witnesses said that it went down in one piece, and then scientists of the time said it couldn't have happened therefore those who believe it did are misremembering the past. And errors in human memory we know is a very real thing. It wasn't until we found the ship that we realised that it did in fact break into two.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply
#29
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
(March 8, 2015 at 9:29 am)Aractus Wrote: It wasn't until we found the ship that we realised that it did in fact break into two.

First, that shows that eyewitlesses are untrustworthy.

Second, there was no conspiracy to cover up the breaking up.
Reply
#30
RE: MH370 did NOT disappear. OP/ED
I don't know if JFK was an inside job but MLK *definitely* was.

;-)
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)