Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 2:37 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Fine Re-Cap by The New Yorker
#1
A Fine Re-Cap by The New Yorker
of recent jesus 'scholarship.' Certain to contain something to piss off everyone.

http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/at...ntPage=all


Quote:The odd absences in Mark are matched by the unreal presences in the other Gospels. The beautiful Nativity story in Luke, for instance, in which a Roman census forces the Holy Family to go back to its ancestral city of Bethlehem, is an obvious invention, since there was no Empire-wide census at that moment, and no sane Roman bureaucrat would have dreamed of ordering people back to be counted in cities that their families had left hundreds of years before. The author of Luke, whoever he might have been, invented Bethlehem in order to put Jesus in David’s city. (James Tabor, a professor of religious studies, in his 2006 book “The Jesus Dynasty,” takes surprisingly seriously the old Jewish idea that Jesus was known as the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier named Pantera

Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/at...z0oDZ6S9W8
Reply
#2
RE: A Fine Re-Cap by The New Yorker
I made it through the first page before the pretentiousness of the author was too much to handle.
I love friendly debate, but I love to stir the pot and play the devils advocate even more.
----------
"Always demand proof, proof is the elementary courtesy that is anyone's due." - Paul Valéry
----------
Ask me about atheism, vegetarianism, secular parenting, or anything else! http://formspring.me/chrisbloom7
Reply
#3
RE: A Fine Re-Cap by The New Yorker
Quote:Certain to contain something to piss off everyone.


See?

Big Grin
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)