|
TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
|
 (November 17, 2015 at 10:49 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I decline to referee. I will not referee a debate with a new member who has not established himself, and for whom I have no post history to draw upon. This. Also, and no offence to the Lemon-ade, but I have neither the time nor the inclinationto referee a debate. If I had the time, I MIGHT.
Dying to live, living to die.
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School  Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. (November 17, 2015 at 11:04 pm)Beccs Wrote:(November 17, 2015 at 10:49 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: I decline to referee. I will not referee a debate with a new member who has not established himself, and for whom I have no post history to draw upon. Grr it's lemonvariable grrr. Lol
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. 
I'll referee....
![[Image: 9611%20-%20fuck_you%20middle_finger%20re...%20wwf.png]](https://whatistheexcel.com/wooobooru/_images/b4620b66cc8d74fd6dbd0877e7c2e7d5/9611%20-%20fuck_you%20middle_finger%20referee%20shane_mcmahon%20survivor_series%20wwf.png) The jesus freak loses.  RE: TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
November 17, 2015 at 11:44 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 11:45 pm by Nay_Sayer.)
FSM would never sacrifice himself to himself to get around his own loopholes.
If this debate must happen it must happen in..... ![[Image: thunderdome.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=edushyster.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F12%2Fthunderdome.jpg) THE THUNDERDOME!!, Two will walk in, Only one rational person will walk out.
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming" -The Prophet Boiardi-
Conservative trigger warning.
![[Image: s-l640.jpg]](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DjAAAOSwpIhe1HCM/s-l640.jpg)  RE: TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
November 17, 2015 at 11:47 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 11:48 pm by TruthisGod.)
The debate topic has to be "Does God exist", not "Does the God of the Bible exist". That is one of my main terms and it's non-negotiable.
TiS, before that can happen, you need to define "God".
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. (November 17, 2015 at 11:47 pm)TruthisGod Wrote: The debate topic has to be "Does God exist", not "Does the God of the Bible exist". That is one of my main terms and it's non-negotiable. Well then we have to find out what is a god?
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.  (November 17, 2015 at 11:47 pm)TruthisGod Wrote: The debate topic has to be "Does God exist", not "Does the God of the Bible exist". That is one of my main terms and it's non-negotiable. If you don't define what you mean by "god" you can f*** right off - you and your terms. It's not like we asked for your futile attempts at proving existence of an imaginary friend, which you can conveniently define and redefine on the fly. You want to have a debate with adults - you have to do it on terms of an adult debate.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Sorry, Lem. It's not you, the other guy has no attachment to this community, and I personally have no intention of extending the courtesy to same. You're free to do so in open forum if the guy actually comes back. If he turns out to not be a complete shitposter, maybe later. Any of the other reds can make it happen, and you're welcome to try one of the others of course.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
