Che Guevera?

[Brian37]

He was an opportunist who lead to Cuba. He was no hero.

[SteelCurtain]

Yabut

Too many moving parts to break. Weak design. Sub-par, physics man.

[Alex K]

We've had this discussion before, Steel. The thing in your pic looks suspiciously like a sorter rather than a crusher.

[Alex K]

Then again...
From their site:

Block stone will be evenly fed into jaw crusher from silo by vibrating feeder for primary crushing, then, the stone after primary crushing will be fed to the impact crusher by belt conveyor for further crushing; after further crushing, the stone will be fed into vibrating screen by belt conveyor for screening and getting stones with several different specifications, and then the stone that meets size requirements will be sent to finished stockpile by belt conveyor; while the other that does not meet the size requirements will be fed into the impact crusher by belt conveyor for re-crushing, so the above steps form a closed multiple cycles. The product size can be combined and graded according to the needs of users, and the portable aggregate plant can be equipped with auxiliary dust removal equipment for protecting the environment.

[SteelCurtain]

I shant gloat.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Poe Poe Poe.

Why don't you fuck off, yeah?

[Longhorn]

*Guevara

That said......

---

CAN IT EAT A SHOE???????

---

[Rev. Rye]

I remember taking a Latin American History class and my impression boiled down to this:

• He really did fight against a corrupt and vile regime (like the Batista Regime.)
  
• He did kill a lot of innocent people. Then again, when doing Guerrilla warfare (or, for that matter, warfare in general), this is, sadly inevitable.
  
• In the end, the big difference between Cuba under Batista and Castro is that Batista's was an authoritarian regime with rampant poverty and nigh-on-nonexistent human rights with American support and Castro's is an authoritarian regime with rampant poverty and nigh-on-nonexistent human rights with little to no American support.
  
• Conclusion: Was Che a good guy? Inconclusive.
  

Point: Carlos Fonseca is a much better role model as Latin American revolutionaries go. When the Sandinistas took over Nicaragua in 1979, they really tried to make things better (Teaching 38% of your population to read in a single year: fucking awesome). If only Reagan hadn't come to power and had the Contras fuck everything up.

[WinterHold]

I remember taking a Latin American History class and my impression boiled down to this:

• He really did fight against a corrupt and vile regime (like the Batista Regime.)
  
• He did kill a lot of innocent people. Then again, when doing Guerrilla warfare (or, for that matter, warfare in general), this is, sadly inevitable.
  
• In the end, the big difference between Cuba under Batista and Castro is that Batista's was an authoritarian regime with rampant poverty and nigh-on-nonexistent human rights with American support and Castro's is an authoritarian regime with rampant poverty and nigh-on-nonexistent human rights with little to no American support.
  
• Conclusion: Was Che a good guy? Inconclusive.
  

Point: Carlos Fonseca is a much better role model as Latin American revolutionaries go. When the Sandinistas took over Nicaragua in 1979, they really tried to make things better (Teaching 38% of your population to read in a single year: fucking awesome). If only Reagan hadn't come to power and had the Contras fuck everything up.

I enjoyed reading this comment; thanks for the conclusion.
My opinion about him was that he didn't kill innocent people and he was a hero; in the Middle East he is viewed like that, mainly.

Though I didn't read anything in English about him; just the translation of his personal diary.
and judging from how Cuba is now : Castro is indeed a dictator

[Dystopia]

Che was a mixed character like the majority of communist leaders. Arguably some will call him a hero, others a villain. I think the truth lies somewhere in between. He killed people. He also believed in solid principles.