Atheism

[houseofcantor]

Uh-oh. Ralphie made eye contact. Now's our chance to run. 

Sorry, Ralph.

[FatAndFaithless]

So are you here to have any sort of actual discussion or just to have a one-man circlejerk?

[JBrentonK]

So are you here to have any sort of actual discussion or just to have a one-man circlejerk?

I'm not sure I can quite understand what it is you're saying. I'm a christian, and I have a religion to respect. I don't have a life to devote to a "no" God, as if that were even humanly possible.

Nevertheless, the OP I believe explains it all. I figured someone would say this after the ignorant RaphielDrake posted his ignorant position, but nonetheless, it seems quite clear to me. As I said, I waited about a full month to return to the forum and post the thread, so you should basically gather from it that, I wish to say something about/aganist/for atheism productively, and feel that in doing so I will enlarge my understanding. But as you can see from this, there is really a far greater bit to it than just that alone. I'm posting under numberous reasons, but mainly only one primordial one. Why you believe that atheism is a plasuable position to hold, given that I genuinely believe in God. But belief in God is not based on evidence my dear friend, belief in God is all the evidence one needs in itself. It isn't believing in god and proving he exists, because that would be like asking a self-contradictory question. It's more of why you believe that you cannot believe in God. I sincerely wonder about this question. And I bothered to take the time to explain it to you so for that you should be grateful. Do other people struggle with this question like I do? To be honest, I've sincerely doubted it for about 18 years.

So it is a discussion, I wish I could pose the OP to be more short and to the point, but it really is.
A: Atheism is not religious and has no epistemologicial logic to base upon itself.
B: Atheism is not regarded by those who believe in God to be a valid position.
C: (really there are many different ones but the obvious is not obvious to some people) Atheism is invalid, hateful, and equally presupposive. It INCITES HATRED.
D: It should be advoided with ones life

the conclusion only makes sense, advoid it with ones life. But why would I pose these questions or inquiries to you, since my OP addresses the issue much more obviously?

Please do not pay attention to this post, it is specificially for the person who asked me to respond.

[FatAndFaithless]

C: (really there are many different ones but the obvious is not obvious to some people) Atheism is invalid, hateful, and equally presupposive. It INCITES HATRED.
D: It should be advoided with ones life


Please do not pay attention to this post, it is specificially for the person who asked me to respond.

Some how I doubt this is worth anyone's time.

[KevinM1]

Aww, look at the troll trying so hard to get banned by comparing atheism to homosexuality.

Who's a good little troll?

[Reforged]

I'm not sure you know what "I don't care" means judging from your response.
This saddens m- oh wait. No. No, I don't care about that either. False alarm.

I'm sorry for misjudging you, RD. I thought you genuinely had something to say in your post.

However, this one, makes it quite clear that I've misjudged you. You're just as dumb as the 99% majority of atheists on this forum. My bad, good "sir".

Shhhh. x

[JBrentonK]

Well somehow it is an atheist forum and I am really interested in posting to an atheist forum. I figured I would get that response too, actually. But I feel that it is actually a challange (believe that?) for atheists, to take the position that their position is illogical (at least for a moment!). Just for one moment! They pose the question, after all, that god does not exist, is it therefore justifiable to post the position that God does exist? Or would that, in itself, be like asking too much? Are atheists too sensitive to christians? This is obviously a no brainer since atheists themselves "are" no brainers. But nonetheless, there should be some topic to post about, and I believe I am generally very consistent with my responses thus far (and including this response) in this thread. So I feel that there is far more justification to what you're saying than just what you are saying itself.

Surely you must give me more credit. It isn't after all like I am saying that atheists can go jump in a creek, but am I missing out on anything? Is not the atheist position logically invalid?

What else to say after that confirmation than "spread the word"? Just kidding? Hello?

[JBrentonK]

Aww, look at the troll trying so hard to get banned by comparing atheism to homosexuality.

Who's a good little troll?

Are you angry, little atheist?


***And the bit about the banning and atheism/closet homosexuality. On this forum, christians are called far worse things. I've seen people relating the bible to castostrophies of terrorism I think, for instance. I've seen christianity being related to hitler. I've seen far far worse things, so don't even get me started. By the way, in the first place, it is atheists that try to insult the christians by calling them blind and irrational, so is not the reverse side of the coin far more amusing? The rules say "attack the position, not the person". I managed to stay within the rules, so that is legit.

[LadyForCamus]

Atheism. Atheism is not a religion. It is most remote from being a part of this great section. As we know, all atheists are in denial of the simple epistemologicial reality of the "theists". At best, atheism is pure closet homosexuality in public, where the disfigured, disgruntled completely irrational minded man says in front of everybody's face for no apparent reason, completely irrational statements, disguised on purpose which is what's worse. How do we expect a world of rationality and clear thought, to widen our horizons one day, when the level of rationality we see before us is as putrid as an example of this particular type of atheist? How can an atheist even claim his position is religious, or "one of religion", when it completely ignores this significant title by being nothing but a position of hatred? The answer is that it is not a religion, nor has ever been a religion. And the world better wisen up if it expects to one day have categories of religion taken seriously.

So I am furious that atheists believe they can be public homosexuals, physically and irrationally disfigured, christian hating "free souls", with no care to the consequences. But that nevertheless is not the point of my thread. I am furious at YOU, the atheist reader, and his public obvious stupiditys and personal hatreds. Furious with the many instances of atheist "morality" and hundreds of millenia worth of credit towards atheists/atheism. This is the essense of stupidity people, you will not be warned again.

By the by, this IS the reason this is in the religion subforum, I hope you all had a very lovely read, please feel free to reply in kind, I've waited about a month before returning to this low, debased forum for posting my thread about this topic. A topic about religiousness. Please feel free to "express" your religion.

Don't forget the baby-eating! Baby-eating is a VERY important facet of our hateful, disfiguring agenda, and should never be overlooked by the theist.

[FatAndFaithless]

Enjoy your time here, bub.