Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 12:47 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist "You are Evidence" argument.
#31
RE: Theist "You are Evidence" argument.
I would counter the "You are the evidence" argument with...

"You lazy sonofabitch."
Reply
#32
RE: Theist "You are Evidence" argument.
(March 17, 2016 at 3:42 pm)Esquilax Wrote: I love this weird, inverse argument from ignorance, because it's so easy to debunk. While I agree it's no good to assume complete knowledge of a given field at any point, I also must point out that we can only form our conclusions based in the data available at the present time. Saying "yeah, this looks like bad design, but we don't know, maybe there's a good justification!" is exactly as fallacious as your Kelvin quote there: Kelvin assumes there's nothing more to discover, and you're assuming that there is a specific thing to discover. You're both doing so on the back of precisely zero positive evidence for those propositions, which is what makes them irrational.

All am saying is, especially when discussing the presence/absence of evidence for something, it is best to keep an open mind and take into account the very real possibility that we don't really know everything that there is to know about the topic. This is how human knowledge increases and progresses further. And that's how true objective science is made. Child-like inside-the-box arrogance gets you no where.
Reply
#33
RE: Theist "You are Evidence" argument.
(March 7, 2016 at 3:37 pm)robvalue Wrote: My usual counter to this type of nonsense is to ask what a non-designed universe would be like, or non-designed life forms.

If they produce an answer, ask them how they possibly know this. "Source: my ass"

If they can't produce an answer, which is the most common outcome, then ask them how they determined that you are evidence with nothing to compare you against.

We recognize design by comparison to non-design. If they can't produce any example of non-design, they are simply making an unnecessary assumption that "everything is designed". It is well established that we evolved, in a way that is consistent with no intervening agent. All that is left is abiogenesis, and if they want to yell "it's magic" then leave them to it.

If we were evidence of design (which we are not) it would be a designer who is incompetent, and goes about things in the most laborious manner possible to allow the greatest number of things to go wrong in the process.

All the theist is really saying is "I can't imagine all this coming about without a designer". The argument from personal incredulity. Truth doesn't depend on who can imagine it.
Your argument of assumption isn't in your favor given the complexity and mathematical truth behind existence on every observable level. To assume chance or change from nothing or void is nonsensical. Evolution in no way refutes a source/ watchmaker/creative force/cause.



Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
Reply
#34
RE: Theist "You are Evidence" argument.
"I know I'm perfect, but how am I the evidence that people were created by god--specifically your god. I'll be waiting, but I wont' be holding my breath."
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Reply
#35
RE: Theist "You are Evidence" argument.
"You don't understand how claims and evidence work."

A claim must be falsifiable and testable, or else it is useless. It amounts to an unecessary assumption.

I will explain why in more detail if anyone is unsure about this.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#36
RE: Theist "You are Evidence" argument.
(March 17, 2016 at 8:07 pm)truth_seeker Wrote: All am saying is, especially when discussing the presence/absence of evidence for something, it is best to keep an open mind and take into account the very real possibility that we don't really know everything that there is to know about the topic. This is how human knowledge increases and progresses further. And that's how true objective science is made. Child-like inside-the-box arrogance gets you no where.

I do have an open mind: if evidence shows that there's something new to know about the subject, I'll amend my views to encompass that new knowledge. I will change my views to fit the evidence, every time. What I won't do is seriously entertain unevidenced claims about a subject just because it'd be really convenient for someone elses' position, least of all because they'll call me arrogant if I don't. Dodgy
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 2377 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 3099 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 32 1566 August 6, 2023 at 5:36 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 4540 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 435 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 7392 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 2716 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1013 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 1942 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 1929 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)