Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 12:39 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mind is the brain?
#31
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 13, 2016 at 1:57 am)robvalue Wrote: Minds have never been shown to exist without brains. This is evidence (not proof, science doesn't deal with proof) that minds require a brain. As soon as someone finds a mind without a brain, we will have a reason to reconsider.

Let me fix this for you:

"Minds have never been shown to exist."

There, that's a little simpler. Big Grin
Reply
#32
RE: Mind is the brain?
You are both right, yes. Minds don't literally exist as an entity, as far as we know. My wording was not good.

Thank you Smile
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#33
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 12, 2016 at 10:07 pm)bennyboy Wrote: *Someone called my name?*

The problem for a material monism is this: it completely disregards, and has no capacity for discussing or explaining, qualia.
You've been saying this for as long as we've been discussing it.  It's no more true now than it was the first time you said it.  You aren't satisfied with a material monist explanation, with the manner that material monist's discuss qualia.  

Not being satisfied is not interchangeable with "no capacity for discussing or explaining".
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#34
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 13, 2016 at 4:06 am)bennyboy Wrote:
(March 13, 2016 at 1:57 am)robvalue Wrote: Minds have never been shown to exist without brains. This is evidence (not proof, science doesn't deal with proof) that minds require a brain. As soon as someone finds a mind without a brain, we will have a reason to reconsider.

Let me fix this for you:

"Minds have never been shown to exist."

There, that's a little simpler. Big Grin

I'm not convinced I believe this. Minds exist as a function of the brain. If the functioning brain is altered then the function of the mind is altered.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#35
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 12, 2016 at 8:13 pm)Esquilax Wrote: So let's consider what conclusion should be reached, using the OP's linked argument. We have brains, and all of the evidence available suggests an inextricable correlation between them. No evidence at all exists that suggests that the mind is separate from the brain, can exist without a brain, or is in any way supernatural, and in many cases the available evidence directly contradicts these claims.

Let us also accept that yes, correlation does not uniformly map to identity. While this is true, it also fails to take into account the state of the evidence at our disposal: given what we know about the brain and minds, would it be rational to throw all that away because it's possible (yet unevidenced) that it's only a correlation and not a case of the two being identical? Should we reverse the burden of proof and say that because we haven't proven that possibility wrong, it's anywhere near as valid as the other conclusion, that fits with all the evidence? Should we conclude that the two are separate, at all?

The answer, on all counts, is no. We must follow where the evidence leads, not ignore the evidence because it's not yet complete and perfect.
i would add strongly to your post is that in science that's all we do: correlations. Every laws of nature we discovered expressed as an equation is a correlation. Every scientific theory is based on a number of hypotheses which is translated into equation, which are correlations. If anyone thinks that correlations are not the way to go, then you've just denied science.
Reply
#36
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 12, 2016 at 9:50 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: The author wasn't arguing that we should accept dualism. He wasn't arguing even that materialism shouldn't believed in. He was simply saying the arguments against dualism are all fallacious and baseless.

As I said, he is an Atheist, and he use to rely on some of the fallacious arguments.

Well, he might be attempting to argue that, but all he's really done is shown that those arguments aren't perfect, airtight proof against dualism, which... I mean... yeah. All evidence-based conclusions are probabilistic, but the fact is that A: an evidence-based conclusion would not lead to dualism and B: not having airtight proof against a position doesn't mean that position is on equal standing with an evidence-based conclusion. The fact that there are ways in which a dualist could wriggle to escape the arguments against dualism is trivial and irrelevant: finding a loophole such that your position still might be possible just puts you back at zero evidence and zero justification for that position, it doesn't mean that the argument you've wriggled out of is totally useless, or fallacious.

It just means that people with prior commitments to positions can find ways around contradictory arguments. That's nothing special.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#37
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 13, 2016 at 12:43 pm)Rhythm Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 10:07 pm)bennyboy Wrote: *Someone called my name?*

The problem for a material monism is this: it completely disregards, and has no capacity for discussing or explaining, qualia.
You've been saying this for as long as we've been discussing it.  It's no more true now than it was the first time you said it.  You aren't satisfied with a material monist explanation, with the manner that material monist's discuss qualia.  

Not being satisfied is not interchangeable with "no capacity for discussing or explaining".

Ru-heally?  You sure?

Okay, tell me, by what criteria will I establish whether a given system experiences qualia?

*Absuive redefinition of "qualia" into physical monist terms in 5. . . 4. . . 3. . . 2. . . 1 . . *
Reply
#38
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 12, 2016 at 7:41 pm)little_monkey Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 7:00 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Define mind please.

I've defined it. There's no need to redefine what has been defined.

Is there ever a point where mind does not equal activities of the brain?
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#39
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 13, 2016 at 1:12 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: I'm not convinced I believe this. Minds exist as a function of the brain. If the functioning brain is altered then the function of the mind is altered.

You are stating as fact something which you assume. Tell me, by what criteria will you establish an actually sentient being from a philosophical zombie?

Before you tell me that mind is altered, you have to tell me how you know that there IS a mind to be altered. Cuz I say it can't be done.
Reply
#40
RE: Mind is the brain?
(March 13, 2016 at 3:33 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Is there ever a point where mind does not equal activities of the brain?
I can answer this. Yes-- the experience of mind is not a brain activity. Brains' activities involve blood flow, electrochemical signal transmission, the release and uptake of neurotransmitters, etc. Mind is the experience of things.

Now, it may be that mind is a product of those processes, or that it is supervenient on them. But mind is no more those physical processes than redness is an apple.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jellyfish have no brain - can they feel pain? Duty 9 909 September 24, 2022 at 2:25 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Understanding the rudiment has much to give helps free that mind for further work. highdimensionman 16 1032 May 24, 2022 at 6:31 am
Last Post: highdimensionman
  How to change a mind Aroura 0 279 July 30, 2018 at 8:13 am
Last Post: Aroura
  The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential Edwardo Piet 82 11541 April 29, 2018 at 1:57 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Mind from the Inside bennyboy 46 5798 September 18, 2016 at 10:18 pm
Last Post: Arkilogue
  What God is to the Universe is what your mind is to your body fdesilva 172 18367 August 23, 2016 at 7:33 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Consciousness is simply an illusion emergent of a Boltzmann brain configuration.... maestroanth 36 5390 April 10, 2016 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Little lunch
  Is personal identity really just mind? Pizza 47 6510 February 14, 2016 at 12:36 pm
Last Post: God of Mr. Hanky
  Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist Rational AKD 348 78820 October 22, 2015 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Mind Over Matter? emjay 70 14731 April 12, 2015 at 9:11 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)