Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 7:37 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
G-C
#1
G-C
I tried to answer your PM but you have me on "ignore."

Here's the answer....although I don't know if you'll be able to see it.


Quote:Abbot's a little early for my tastes.  I generally consider 19th century scholarship too primitive in light of subsequent discoveries.  When I read Mary Boyce's book on Zoroastrianism she referred to a guy named Frye as the leading historian.

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/phoenix-...1842120118

There is also another guy named Olmstead but there was a cautionary note in her bibliography that he had a number of inaccuracies and the book originally dates to 1948.  I did see a note about Olmstead though that said his book was written from the Persian rather than the Greek point of view.  That's a matter of taste.

With any of this stuff it sort of depends on what you can get your hands on. 
Reply
#2
RE: G-C
Perhaps someone who you don't have on ignore could quote the reply and you would see it that way.
Reply
#3
RE: G-C
Could be tricky. From what I read of his posts he ignores everyone.

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)