Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 4:24 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"heaven" meme on facebook
#11
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
(April 29, 2016 at 9:57 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:
(April 29, 2016 at 9:00 am)Wryetui Wrote: I have some problems understanding your reasoning, if you allow me. "And the only important thing in your life is keeping an imaginary sky-daddy happy so you get to go to the good place after you die. And the only important thing in your life is keeping an imaginary sky-daddy happy so you get to go to the good place after you die.", " I have personally witnessed the misery and evil that this mindset creates. I have witnessed families torn apart by parents who believe that god will send them to hell if they don't disown their children. I have witnessed the fear of children, praying to be "good enough" so they will get into heaven instead of burning."

Can you explain to me the nature of these theologically wrong bolded prepositions? It is becoming clear to me that you do not, in fact, "hate this madness called christianity", but you have made an idea of what christianity is (in your head) and you are attacking theology based on your own idea, not the original one. Can you read this? https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/glory2god...kalomiros/

Ah, one of these.


He's right, dude. Your religion is a death cult that touts cruelty, evil, and spiritual threats. You have simply done the mental gymnastics/been indoctrinated to such an extent that you don't see this.


Yes, according to your religion, the only point of Earthly life is so god can decide whether to burn you, and the only way to stop him is to placate his demands.


Yes, according to your religion,  Jehovah sends  people to Hell. They do not send themselves.


If a robber sticks a gun in my chest and says he'll kill me if I don't give him all my money, am I killing myself if I refuse him?


There is no such thing as correct theology. God is a lie.

Your response automatically starts wrong by you stating "ah, one of these", that is, inmediately labeling my person and tying me up to a certain pre-existent idea you have about a group of persons.

I believe that none of the blank statements you have made in your post are correct, but rather based on a fictional form of christianity that you have created yourself, and are judging me and my beliefs in base of that.

You will have to provide to me evidence that "my religion is a death cult that touts cruelty, evil and spiritual threats", that is, you will have to show me how the Orthodox Church act like this and when exactly, otherwise I will not believe you and I will conclude that your statements are empty and devoid of any meaning.

Also, you have made the following statement about me: "You have simply done the mental gymnastics/been indoctrinated to such an extent that you don't see this." This is another blank statement, a huge accusation about a person you do not know, again based on your own made-up ideas. I was not blessed with someone who could have indoctrinated me because there was never such a person in my life, to my regret. I was an atheist like you, whom, following the philosophy of Nietschze, Kant and many others I reached the point in which God could not have been something that exists. Only after that I began to study Patristic theology and philosophy, besides Platonism and Neoplatonism, and I have concluded that atheism is wrong in its very nature.

"Yes, according to your religion, the only point of Earthly life is so god can decide whether to burn you, and the only way to stop him is to placate his demands.", this is wrong, again. No, it is not wrong that the point in this earthly life is to redeem from sin and reach communion with God, theosis, but the rest of the phrase is utterly wrong. God does not decides whether or not "He burns us" and no, nothing you can ever do will ever affect God's emotion towards you, love, so there is no such thing as called "to placate his demands" because he is not a tyrant. At this point I understood that you are mad at God, or, at a kind of being that you call "God" but its entirely made up by you. This kind of emotionalism stops you from seeing the truth, which can only be attained in serenity and free of prejudices.

"Yes, according to your religion, Jehovah sends people to Hell. They do not send themselves.
If a robber sticks a gun in my chest and says he'll kill me if I don't give him all my money, am I killing myself if I refuse him?", this is blatantly false, again. Hell is not a place people get sent to, this is not heathenism, we do not believe in a place where the wicked get everlasting punishment for their deeds, that is paganism, so there cannot be something as "sending people to Hell" because Hell or Heaven are not places at all, it is not like you send someone to Virginia. Heaven and hell are relations to or experiences of God's just and loving presence. There is no created place of divine absence, nor is hell an ontological separation from God. One expression of the Eastern teaching is that hell and heaven are dimensions of God's intensifying presence, as this presence is experienced either as torment or as paradise depending on the spiritual state of a person dwelling with God. For one who hates God and by extension hates himself as God's image-bearer, to be encompassed by the divine presence could only result in unspeakable anguish. At this point I have acknowledged that you have no idea what "my religion" is, and you, in extension, cannot "hate my religion" since you did not describe it at all, you did not even talk about it.

No, "If a robber sticks a gun in my chest and says he'll kill me if I don't give him all my money, am I killing myself if I refuse him?", if a robber sticks a gun in your chest threatening you with killing you, you are not killing yourself if you refuse him, but your analogy is wrong since it has little to relate with the discussion, even if you believe it is perfect. I will give you an example. When I was little I went with my parents to see an underground cave, the most famous one in Spain, in a guided visit. However, that day was stormy, and I was afraid that we may miss the trip because of the rain, but the things changed and the sun started shining again, I cannot describe the happiness I felt when I saw the sun, its rays and its warm presence. We went to the cave and we spent, doing the guided visit, about half an hour in a overwhelming darkness (it was an underground cave), but my surprise was when we finally went outside. My first feeling was pain, pain everywhere. I felt like the sun was my worst enemy, its rays were now hurting me, I did not wanted to see the light anymore, I did not want it to shine, I would have wished that all the clouds in the world would have protected me! My eyes, of course, after all that time underground, got used to the darkness, and, when seeing the sun, the light afflicted me. Do you believe I should have started screaming and shouting to the sun things like: "Why are you punishing me?!" or "Why do you torment me like this?!", no, it did not make sense. The sun was exactly the same sun, it did not change at all, the same sun that conforted and gave me heat, that made me happy before entering the cave is now hurting me in the worst manner! It was not the sun's fault, the sun kept being like it always was, it was me that changed after going into the darkness, not the sun. The sun was not punishing me, I just felt the sun in an another way. Do you understand?

Moderator Notice
Duplicate post deleted by Robvalue.
"Let us commit ourselves and one another and our whole life to Christ, our God"
 - Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom

[Image: ixs081.png]
Reply
#12
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
I was raised fundamentalist.  I was made to memorize a Bible passage each day and recite it at dinner from the ages of 7 - 18.
I'm not going to discuss theology with anyone, because theology is arguing about the qualities of something that does not exist. 
[Image: a77228c97829c2ec7d3c4528f60201af.jpg]
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
Reply
#13
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
(April 29, 2016 at 9:54 am)Wryetui Wrote:
(April 29, 2016 at 9:46 am)Alex K Wrote: Theologically wrong according to whom? It's not like there is one "consensus theology" that a significant fraction of Christians agree upon. And even if- I'd wager that most real life Christians don't concern themselves much with what hair splitting theologians do in their learned works.

According to the theology of the early Church, that is still alive and well in what we call today the Orthodox Church, as well as in part of the Catholic Church and the Non-Chalcedonian Churches. That is the theology that existed from the beginning, that of the Capadoccian fathers and the other Church Fathers.

Can you elaborate briefly how this theology contradicts the above?

In any case, this theology you cite does not seem to be what guides these above mentioned people's lived religion. They very much worry about pleasing god in order not to be sent to hell... Maybe if you explain what you think the disagreement is, this will becone more clear.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#14
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
(April 29, 2016 at 11:42 am)Alex K Wrote:
(April 29, 2016 at 9:54 am)Wryetui Wrote: According to the theology of the early Church, that is still alive and well in what we call today the Orthodox Church, as well as in part of the Catholic Church and the Non-Chalcedonian Churches. That is the theology that existed from the beginning, that of the Capadoccian fathers and the other Church Fathers.

Can you elaborate briefly how this theology contradicts the above?

In any case, this theology you cite does not seem to be what guides these above mentioned people's lived religion. They very much worry about pleasing god in order not to be sent to hell... Maybe if you explain what you think the disagreement is, this will becone more clear.

Of course, forgive me for not explaining it earlier. The explanation is explained pretty well here: http://preachersinstitute.com/2009/11/03...-chopelas/ (a deep theological article explained by a layman) or here: https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/glory2god...kalomiros/ (this is one written by an Orthodox priest, and its pure gold). No matter how deep these articles are and that they explain theology as it always existed, I assume that you may not have the time to read them, so I will sum things up a little bit:

"The idea that God is an angry figure who sends those He condemns to a place called Hell, where they spend eternity in torment separated from His presence, is missing from the Bible and unknown in the early church. While Heaven and Hell are decidedly real, they are experiential conditions rather than physical places, and both exist in the presence of God. In fact, nothing exists outside the presence of God.
This is not the way traditional Western Christianity, Roman Catholic or Protestant, has envisioned the afterlife. In Western thought Hell is a location, a place where God punishes the wicked, where they are cut off from God and the Kingdom of Heaven. Yet this concept occurs nowhere in the Bible, and does not exist in the original languages of the Bible.
While there is no question that according to the Scriptures there is torment and “gnashing of teeth” for the wicked, and glorification for the righteous, and that this judgment comes from God, these destinies are not separate destinations. The Bible indicates that everyone comes before God in the next life, and it is because of being in God’s presence that they either suffer eternally, or experience eternal joy.  In other words, both the joy of heaven, and the torment of judgment, is caused by being eternally in the presence of the Almighty, the perfect and unchanging God.

This is not a new interpretation or a secret truth. It has been there all along, held by the Church from the beginning, revealed in the languages of the Scriptures, which were spoken by the Christians of the early church era. This understanding was held by nearly all Christians everywhere for the first 1000 years of the Church’s existence, and, except where influence by western theologies, continued to be held by Christians beyond Western Europe and America even up to this day (including the roughly 350 million Orthodox Christians worldwide).

When you examine in context the source words which are translated as “hell” in English language Bibles the original understanding becomes clear.  You will find that “hell” is translated from four different Greek and Hebrew words.  These words are not interchangeable in the original language, yet, incredibly, in English-language bibles these words are translated differently in different places to fit the translators’ theology (rather than allow the words of scripture to determine their theology).  Not only did English translators dump these four very different words into one meaning, they were not even consistent with it and chose to translate these same words with different meanings in different places. It is no wonder that English readers of the Bible are confused.
If one examines what the early Church Fathers wrote about “hell” and the afterlife, it will be seen that they too understood that there is no place called hell, and that both paradise and torment came from being in God’s presence in the afterlife.

When you examine what the Roman Catholic Church teaches and what most Protestants believe about the afterlife, and compare that with the scriptures and early Church beliefs, you find large disparities.  You will also find their innovative doctrines were not drawn from the Bible or historic Church doctrine, but rather from the mythology of the Middle Ages, juridical concepts, and enlightenment rationalizations, all alien to early Christian thought."

(April 29, 2016 at 11:22 am)drfuzzy Wrote: I was raised fundamentalist.  I was made to memorize a Bible passage each day and recite it at dinner from the ages of 7 - 18.
I'm not going to discuss theology with anyone, because theology is arguing about the qualities of something that does not exist. 
[Image: a77228c97829c2ec7d3c4528f60201af.jpg]
You are more faithful than a lot of christians I have seen, I congratulate you.
"Let us commit ourselves and one another and our whole life to Christ, our God"
 - Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom

[Image: ixs081.png]
Reply
#15
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
(April 29, 2016 at 11:04 am)Wryetui Wrote: Your response automatically starts wrong by you stating "ah, one of these", that is, inmediately labeling my person and tying me up to a certain pre-existent idea you have about a group of persons.


Well, my assumption was that you're "one of these" who blames god's alleged wrath on us ("You send yourself to Hell!") and defends his faith with the "No True Scotsman" fallacy ("No True Christian believes/does that! No True Christian could have left the faith!").


Maybe you'll prove me wrong. Let's see.



Quote:I believe that none of the blank statements you have made in your post are correct, but rather based on a fictional form of christianity that you have created yourself, and are judging me and my beliefs in base of that.


No, my assertions are based on a thorough reading of the entire Bible and 20+ years as a Christian myself. To me, all forms of Christianity are based on fiction.


I'll bet I wasn't a True Scotsman, though, was I? Was I?


Quote:You will have to provide to me evidence that "my religion is a death cult that touts cruelty, evil and spiritual threats", that is, you will have to show me how the Orthodox Church act like this and when exactly, otherwise I will not believe you and I will conclude that your statements are empty and devoid of any meaning.


Gladly.


so the Orthodox Church are True Scotsman, then, are they? Fine. The Orthodox Church is Christian, is it not?


That means that they believe that humanity's only salvation lies in the torture and death of a human sacrifice (Jesus), and that people who do not accept this gift and believe in their god will experience Hell. They also believe that the greatest possible human achievement is to die and experience Heaven. Sound about right?


They're a death cult because they glorify death, and Hell is the cruelty/spiritual threat that they broadcast as "god's love." Sickening.


Quote:Also, you have made the following statement about me: "You have simply done the mental gymnastics/been indoctrinated to such an extent that you don't see this." This is another blank statement, a huge accusation about a person you do not know, again based on your own made-up ideas. I was not blessed with someone who could have indoctrinated me because there was never such a person in my life, to my regret.


Hooooo boy...this cannot be a good sign...


Quote:I was an atheist like you, whom, following the philosophy of Nietschze, Kant and many others I reached the point in which God could not have been something that exists. Only after that I began to study Patristic theology and philosophy, besides Platonism and Neoplatonism, and I have concluded that atheism is wrong in its very nature.


Aaaand that would be the mental gymnastics I'm talking about.


Also, I haven't read any of that crap. There was one book, though, that pretty much single-handedly convinced me that the entire Bible is a lie. Know what book that was?


It was the Bible.


Quote:"Yes, according to your religion, the only point of Earthly life is so god can decide whether to burn you, and the only way to stop him is to placate his demands.", this is wrong, again. No, it is not wrong that the point in this earthly life is to redeem from sin and reach communion with God, theosis, but the rest of the phrase is utterly wrong. God does not decides whether or not "He burns us"


Oh? Who decides then?


If you're going to tell me that we decide, then no, that's not how that works. That takes us right back to the robber analogy. If your god invented Hell and all the criteria on which people end up there, then he is responsible when people go there. Them deciding not to follow god's criteria would be the equivalent of me telling the robber I'm not giving up my money.


If you're going to tell me that Hell isn't a place where people burn...that doesn't matter. Hell, whatever form it takes, is still the gun.


Quote:and no, nothing you can ever do will ever affect God's emotion towards you, love, so there is no such thing as called "to placate his demands" because he is not a tyrant.


"Love me, worship me, and believe in me despite all evidence to the contrary, or I will do the worst possible thing to you forever and ever and ever."


Yes, he is a tyrant.


Quote:At this point I understood that you are mad at God, or, at a kind of being that you call "God" but its entirely made up by you. This kind of emotionalism stops you from seeing the truth, which can only be attained in serenity and free of prejudices.


Jerkoff Really, bro? You're going there?


Do you believe in Thor? No?


Why are you so mad at Thor? What did a Thor-worshiper do to you that caused you to hate Thor?


I do not believe your god exists. How could I be mad at something that doesn't exist?


I think your beliefs are ridiculous and disgusting, and I am probably a little angry about all the damage that religious people do to others in the form of bigotry and oppression, but no, I'm not mad at your imaginary friend any more than you're mad at the Grinch for stealing Christmas from the Whos.


Quote:"Yes, according to your religion, Jehovah sends people to Hell. They do not send themselves.
If a robber sticks a gun in my chest and says he'll kill me if I don't give him all my money, am I killing myself if I refuse him?", this is blatantly false, again. Hell is not a place people get sent to, this is not heathenism, we do not believe in a place where the wicked get everlasting punishment for their deeds, that is paganism, so there cannot be something as "sending people to Hell" because Hell or Heaven are not places at all, it is not like you send someone to Virginia. Heaven and hell are relations to or experiences of God's just and loving presence. There is no created place of divine absence, nor is hell an ontological separation from God. One expression of the Eastern teaching is that hell and heaven are dimensions of God's intensifying presence, as this presence is experienced either as torment or as paradise depending on the spiritual state of a person dwelling with God. For one who hates God and by extension hates himself as God's image-bearer, to be encompassed by the divine presence could only result in unspeakable anguish. At this point I have acknowledged that you have no idea what "my religion" is, and you, in extension, cannot "hate my religion" since you did not describe it at all, you did not even talk about it.


Does your church not accept the gospels? Do those gospels not depict Jesus himself describing a place with weeping and gnashing of teeth, where the fire never goes out?


You know what? It doesn't matter what ridiculous, fictional form the "eternal torment" part takes, and you're totally beside the point by focusing on that. It doesn't matter if Hell is separation from god, a torturous existence in god's presence (because of whatever you said), or a lake of fire with demons and pitchforks and rivers of rancid shit sauce. The point is that you think your god is justified in inflicting eternal punishment for finite crimes committed by a creation that he knew in advance would behave that way.


Quote:No, "If a robber sticks a gun in my chest and says he'll kill me if I don't give him all my money, am I killing myself if I refuse him?", if a robber sticks a gun in your chest threatening you with killing you, you are not killing yourself if you refuse him, but your analogy is wrong since it has little to relate with the discussion, even if you believe it is perfect.


Gun=Hell


Robber=God


Me=Humans


If I refuse to believe in your god, I'm am not responsible for being in Hell any more than I'm responsible for being shot. The analogy seems pretty straight-forward to me, but let's see if you can explain yourself.



Quote: I will give you an example. When I was little I went with my parents to see an underground cave, the most famous one in Spain, in a guided visit. However, that day was stormy, and I was afraid that we may miss the trip because of the rain, but the things changed and the sun started shining again, I cannot describe the happiness I felt when I saw the sun, its rays and its warm presence. We went to the cave and we spent, doing the guided visit, about half an hour in a overwhelming darkness (it was an underground cave), but my surprise was when we finally went outside. My first feeling was pain, pain everywhere. I felt like the sun was my worst enemy, its rays were now hurting me, I did not wanted to see the light anymore, I did not want it to shine, I would have wished that all the clouds in the world would have protected me! My eyes, of course, after all that time underground, got used to the darkness, and, when seeing the sun, the light afflicted me. Do you believe I should have started screaming and shouting to the sun things like: "Why are you punishing me?!" or "Why do you torment me like this?!", no, it did not make sense. The sun was exactly the same sun, it did not change at all, the same sun that conforted and gave me heat, that made me happy before entering the cave is now hurting me in the worst manner! It was not the sun's fault, the sun kept being like it always was, it was me that changed after going into the darkness, not the sun. The sun was not punishing me, I just felt the sun in an another way. Do you understand?


Yeah...THAT story has nothing to do with what we're talking about, and it does not adequately refute my analogy. What you're positing is a being that will inflict eternal torment on me (in one form or another) if I don't believe in him when I die. That is a gun-to-chest scenario. There is nothing sunny or pleasant about that, no matter how much time you spend in the cave of religion.
Verbatim from the mouth of Jesus (retranslated from a retranslation of a copy of a copy):

"Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you too will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. How can you see your brother's head up his ass when your own vision is darkened by your head being even further up your ass? How can you say to your brother, 'Get your head out of your ass,' when all the time your head is up your own ass? You hypocrite! First take your head out of your own ass, and then you will see clearly who has his head up his ass and who doesn't." Matthew 7:1-5 (also Luke 6: 41-42)

Also, I has a website: www.RedbeardThePink.com
Reply
#16
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
I wonder how many kids Paulie fucked up the ass?
Reply
#17
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
(April 30, 2016 at 2:04 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:
(April 29, 2016 at 11:04 am)Wryetui Wrote: Your response automatically starts wrong by you stating "ah, one of these", that is, inmediately labeling my person and tying me up to a certain pre-existent idea you have about a group of persons.


Well, my assumption was that you're "one of these" who blames god's alleged wrath on us ("You send yourself to Hell!") and defends his faith with the "No True Scotsman" fallacy ("No True Christian believes/does that! No True Christian could have left the faith!").


Maybe you'll prove me wrong. Let's see.



Quote:I believe that none of the blank statements you have made in your post are correct, but rather based on a fictional form of christianity that you have created yourself, and are judging me and my beliefs in base of that.


No, my assertions are based on a thorough reading of the entire Bible and 20+ years as a Christian myself. To me, all forms of Christianity are based on fiction.


I'll bet I wasn't a True Scotsman, though, was I? Was I?


Quote:You will have to provide to me evidence that "my religion is a death cult that touts cruelty, evil and spiritual threats", that is, you will have to show me how the Orthodox Church act like this and when exactly, otherwise I will not believe you and I will conclude that your statements are empty and devoid of any meaning.


Gladly.


so the Orthodox Church are True Scotsman, then, are they? Fine. The Orthodox Church is Christian, is it not?


That means that they believe that humanity's only salvation lies in the torture and death of a human sacrifice (Jesus), and that people who do not accept this gift and believe in their god will experience Hell. They also believe that the greatest possible human achievement is to die and experience Heaven. Sound about right?


They're a death cult because they glorify death, and Hell is the cruelty/spiritual threat that they broadcast as "god's love." Sickening.


Quote:Also, you have made the following statement about me: "You have simply done the mental gymnastics/been indoctrinated to such an extent that you don't see this." This is another blank statement, a huge accusation about a person you do not know, again based on your own made-up ideas. I was not blessed with someone who could have indoctrinated me because there was never such a person in my life, to my regret.


Hooooo boy...this cannot be a good sign...


Quote:I was an atheist like you, whom, following the philosophy of Nietschze, Kant and many others I reached the point in which God could not have been something that exists. Only after that I began to study Patristic theology and philosophy, besides Platonism and Neoplatonism, and I have concluded that atheism is wrong in its very nature.


Aaaand that would be the mental gymnastics I'm talking about.


Also, I haven't read any of that crap. There was one book, though, that pretty much single-handedly convinced me that the entire Bible is a lie. Know what book that was?


It was the Bible.


Quote:"Yes, according to your religion, the only point of Earthly life is so god can decide whether to burn you, and the only way to stop him is to placate his demands.", this is wrong, again. No, it is not wrong that the point in this earthly life is to redeem from sin and reach communion with God, theosis, but the rest of the phrase is utterly wrong. God does not decides whether or not "He burns us"


Oh? Who decides then?


If you're going to tell me that we decide, then no, that's not how that works. That takes us right back to the robber analogy. If your god invented Hell and all the criteria on which people end up there, then he is responsible when people go there. Them deciding not to follow god's criteria would be the equivalent of me telling the robber I'm not giving up my money.


If you're going to tell me that Hell isn't a place where people burn...that doesn't matter. Hell, whatever form it takes, is still the gun.


Quote:and no, nothing you can ever do will ever affect God's emotion towards you, love, so there is no such thing as called "to placate his demands" because he is not a tyrant.


"Love me, worship me, and believe in me despite all evidence to the contrary, or I will do the worst possible thing to you forever and ever and ever."


Yes, he is a tyrant.


Quote:At this point I understood that you are mad at God, or, at a kind of being that you call "God" but its entirely made up by you. This kind of emotionalism stops you from seeing the truth, which can only be attained in serenity and free of prejudices.


Jerkoff Really, bro? You're going there?


Do you believe in Thor? No?


Why are you so mad at Thor? What did a Thor-worshiper do to you that caused you to hate Thor?


I do not believe your god exists. How could I be mad at something that doesn't exist?


I think your beliefs are ridiculous and disgusting, and I am probably a little angry about all the damage that religious people do to others in the form of bigotry and oppression, but no, I'm not mad at your imaginary friend any more than you're mad at the Grinch for stealing Christmas from the Whos.


Quote:"Yes, according to your religion, Jehovah sends people to Hell. They do not send themselves.
If a robber sticks a gun in my chest and says he'll kill me if I don't give him all my money, am I killing myself if I refuse him?", this is blatantly false, again. Hell is not a place people get sent to, this is not heathenism, we do not believe in a place where the wicked get everlasting punishment for their deeds, that is paganism, so there cannot be something as "sending people to Hell" because Hell or Heaven are not places at all, it is not like you send someone to Virginia. Heaven and hell are relations to or experiences of God's just and loving presence. There is no created place of divine absence, nor is hell an ontological separation from God. One expression of the Eastern teaching is that hell and heaven are dimensions of God's intensifying presence, as this presence is experienced either as torment or as paradise depending on the spiritual state of a person dwelling with God. For one who hates God and by extension hates himself as God's image-bearer, to be encompassed by the divine presence could only result in unspeakable anguish. At this point I have acknowledged that you have no idea what "my religion" is, and you, in extension, cannot "hate my religion" since you did not describe it at all, you did not even talk about it.


Does your church not accept the gospels? Do those gospels not depict Jesus himself describing a place with weeping and gnashing of teeth, where the fire never goes out?


You know what? It doesn't matter what ridiculous, fictional form the "eternal torment" part takes, and you're totally beside the point by focusing on that. It doesn't matter if Hell is separation from god, a torturous existence in god's presence (because of whatever you said), or a lake of fire with demons and pitchforks and rivers of rancid shit sauce. The point is that you think your god is justified in inflicting eternal punishment for finite crimes committed by a creation that he knew in advance would behave that way.


Quote:No, "If a robber sticks a gun in my chest and says he'll kill me if I don't give him all my money, am I killing myself if I refuse him?", if a robber sticks a gun in your chest threatening you with killing you, you are not killing yourself if you refuse him, but your analogy is wrong since it has little to relate with the discussion, even if you believe it is perfect.


Gun=Hell


Robber=God


Me=Humans


If I refuse to believe in your god, I'm am not responsible for being in Hell any more than I'm responsible for being shot. The analogy seems pretty straight-forward to me, but let's see if you can explain yourself.



Quote: I will give you an example. When I was little I went with my parents to see an underground cave, the most famous one in Spain, in a guided visit. However, that day was stormy, and I was afraid that we may miss the trip because of the rain, but the things changed and the sun started shining again, I cannot describe the happiness I felt when I saw the sun, its rays and its warm presence. We went to the cave and we spent, doing the guided visit, about half an hour in a overwhelming darkness (it was an underground cave), but my surprise was when we finally went outside. My first feeling was pain, pain everywhere. I felt like the sun was my worst enemy, its rays were now hurting me, I did not wanted to see the light anymore, I did not want it to shine, I would have wished that all the clouds in the world would have protected me! My eyes, of course, after all that time underground, got used to the darkness, and, when seeing the sun, the light afflicted me. Do you believe I should have started screaming and shouting to the sun things like: "Why are you punishing me?!" or "Why do you torment me like this?!", no, it did not make sense. The sun was exactly the same sun, it did not change at all, the same sun that conforted and gave me heat, that made me happy before entering the cave is now hurting me in the worst manner! It was not the sun's fault, the sun kept being like it always was, it was me that changed after going into the darkness, not the sun. The sun was not punishing me, I just felt the sun in an another way. Do you understand?


Yeah...THAT story has nothing to do with what we're talking about, and it does not adequately refute my analogy. What you're positing is a being that will inflict eternal torment on me (in one form or another) if I don't believe in him when I die. That is a gun-to-chest scenario. There is nothing sunny or pleasant about that, no matter how much time you spend in the cave of religion.

"Well, my assumption was that you're "one of these" who blames god's alleged wrath on us ("You send yourself to Hell!") and defends his faith with the "No True Scotsman" fallacy ("No True Christian believes/does that! No True Christian could have left the faith!").", there is not a thing called "God's wrath", as I have told you. God's only feeling towards you is love, and everything He does is for your good and because He loves you. Rather than the pompous statement this can be, it hides all the truth from christianity, either you accept it or not.

"No, my assertions are based on a thorough reading of the entire Bible and 20+ years as a Christian myself. To me, all forms of Christianity are based on fiction.", since you obviously lack theology, I believe you lied to me and you did not even touch the Bible (most likely). No, to you, not all forms of christianity are based on fiction. You just simply got dissapointed by some form of protestantism and you decided we are all the same. Very anti-intellectual, in my opinion.

"That means that they believe that humanity's only salvation lies in the torture and death of a human sacrifice (Jesus), and that people who do not accept this gift and believe in their god will experience Hell. They also believe that the greatest possible human achievement is to die and experience Heaven. Sound about right?" Just because you do not like how this sound it doesn't make it true. You can do in this life thousands of achievements, but compared to the eternal blessing of be in God's grace (uncreated energies) they are nothing. Also, Heaven is an experience of the soul that starts in this life, not "after death".

"They're a death cult because they glorify death, and Hell is the cruelty/spiritual threat that they broadcast as "god's love." Sickening.", it is true, God's love is what make people suffer in the state of Hell. Again, you are just being emotional here, you did not make an actual statement. You just said that it is unpleasant to you how christianity is. This has no point in it being real or not. Wars are also displeasant to me but they still exist.

"Also, I haven't read any of that crap. There was one book, though, that pretty much single-handedly convinced me that the entire Bible is a lie. Know what book that was? It was the Bible.", I do believe that this is a lie you are telling yourself.

"
Oh? Who decides then?


If you're going to tell me that we decide, then no, that's not how that works. That takes us right back to the robber analogy. If your god invented Hell and all the criteria on which people end up there, then he is responsible when people go there. Them deciding not to follow god's criteria would be the equivalent of me telling the robber I'm not giving up my money.If you're going to tell me that Hell isn't a place where people burn...that doesn't matter. Hell, whatever form it takes, is still the gun."

"If you're going to tell me that we decide, then no, that's not how that works.". This is a lie.

"That takes us right back to the robber analogy.", analogy which fails and I explained why.

"If your god invented Hell and all the criteria on which people end up there, then he is responsible when people go there." Lies over lies. And this comes from a person that over the course of 20 years did read the Bible everyday (just the Bible, of course, God forbid he actually read some christian history, exegesis of some early Fathers and so on...). First of all, what is this nonsense of "god invented Hell", didn't I tell you that Hell is not a place but a response of the soul to God's presence? That is exactly the analogy about me and the sun. While I experienced the sun as being a warm ball in the sky that gave me confort, some people may experience it as pain and burning. That is all of it, not the sun is the problem, but the people that are experiencing the sun. "He is responsible when people go there", again, Hell is not a place where you go like you go to a vacation because it is not a physical space. Let me copy-paste the information you did not read: "Hell or Heaven are not places at all, it is not like you send someone to Virginia. Heaven and hell are relations to or experiences of God's just and loving presence. There is no created place of divine absence, nor is hell an ontological separation from God. One expression of the Eastern teaching is that hell and heaven are dimensions of God's intensifying presence, as this presence is experienced either as torment or as paradise depending on the spiritual state of a person dwelling with God. For one who hates God and by extension hates himself as God's image-bearer, to be encompassed by the divine presence could only result in unspeakable anguish."

Basically this is it: God creates humanity, the humanity (Adam and Eve) fall because they must be put to test in order for them to want God, not to merely be in communion with Him like puppets. But of course, the fall, that is, separation from God, caused effects in humanity, since they separated from the source of life (God is life) death entered into the world, human will became gnomic, suffering appeared and so on... But God saw this, and He knew perfectly that people, due to the corruption their soul is damaged and will experience Him as suffering when His created energies will shine upon them, did something to bring them to life, gave the world Himself in order to save them from the effects of the fall, corruption, death, suffering and so on. This was not a Plan B, was the plan from the beginning, the Incarnation of the Word. So it happened, the Word incarnated, thus uniting the fallen human nature with the perfect divine nature, ascending people to where they should be. This is subjective redemption, now, every person must take objective redemption, that is, willing participation in the acts of redemption. I do not see anywhere the angry God you described, what are you talking about?


"Does your church not accept the gospels? Do those gospels not depict Jesus himself describing a place with weeping and gnashing of teeth, where the fire never goes out?", a place, again? Of course He describes that, and yes, my Church not only accepts the Gospels, but collected the Gospels into what we now call the Bible around the 4th century. Yes, Jesus Christ describes all of that, but the question you are missing is: Even if Jesus Christ describes these places of suffering, does the suffering here occur because Jesus Christ punishes people with it, or has another nature?

"The point is that you think your god is justified in inflicting eternal punishment for finite crimes committed by a creation that he knew in advance would behave that way.", again, you are wrong. If you believe Hell is a punishment from God you do not have even the slightiest piece of christian theology. Hell is the energies of God experienced as suffering by those who did not purify themselves in this life. If you believe that if you live 30 years of your life in a dungeon with no way out, and you suddenly escape, being in the middle of a field in the month of August, and the burns and sufferings the sun causes you are punishments and torments from the sun to an innocent creature like you, it is not me who is delusional. God doesn't actively burn like the sun, but passively, that is how His essence is, never God wanted for people to suffer. Why doesn't the sun "punish" those peasants who have been working said fields day after day? Because they constantly lived with the sun and are used to it. You do not believe love causes suffering? Do you remember the Prodigal Son? What occured when the son came back? His father was overwhelmed by his son's presence, he felt the most pure love He could have ever feel and his son's presence made him feel the most joyful person on earth. But what caused the prodigal son's presence to his older brother? He started to hate him. The very same "thing" caused two different reactions to the people around it.

"If I refuse to believe in your god, I'm am not responsible for being in Hell any more than I'm responsible for being shot. The analogy seems pretty straight-forward to me, but let's see if you can explain yourself.", again, leave the analogy because it is not good, anymore than it is good for you to believe that if the sun gives you insolation for staying too much time unprepared in its presence it is because it punishes you. Since God is the medicine, are you responsible for being sick if you do not take it?

"What you're positing is a being that will inflict eternal torment on me (in one form or another) if I don't believe in him when I die.", what is the nature of this lie? Where did you get the "if I don't believe in him when I die"? Hell is caused by a sickness of the soul (sin) because it blocks you from perceiving God as He is and turns His presence into suffering for you. If you do not heal yourself of that sickness is entirely your choice. God has disposed absolutely everything for humans to get saved, He sent His son to destroy the realm of death, corruption and sin that has taken over humanity, He founded an ekklesia that is constantly the place of indwelling of the Holy Spirit that constantly sanctifies its members through the sacraments and other acts. Yet here you are, complaining that you will "go to Hell" after you die.
"Let us commit ourselves and one another and our whole life to Christ, our God"
 - Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom

[Image: ixs081.png]
Reply
#18
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
Shouldn't we just set this guy up next to Drich or one of our other "True Believers™" and let them just duke it out?

I'm exhausted from watching Christians (well, all theists, but mainly Christians) come here and play the "you just don't understand the Bible/God/theology" game with their various interpretations, all asserting that if I just studied THEIR version, I'd finally get it.

Religious "Whack-a-Mole". As soon as you bang one version in the ground, and attempt to apply it to the next theist, nope! Their bull comes from another mole-hole on the other side of the table.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
#19
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
(April 29, 2016 at 9:00 am)Wryetui Wrote:
(April 28, 2016 at 3:07 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Sadness.
A friend posted this on Facebook.  She is an intelligent woman - very pleasant.  At one time I would have agreed with the sentiment.  Now I just find it a little heartbreaking. Imagine living your entire life, focused only on an un-provable fantasy about what will happen to you after death. And the only important thing in your life is keeping an imaginary sky-daddy happy so you get to go to the good place after you die.
   I have personally witnessed the misery and evil that this mindset creates. I have witnessed families torn apart by parents who believe that god will send them to hell if they don't disown their children. I have witnessed the fear of children, praying to be "good enough" so they will get into heaven instead of burning. When will this madness end?
[Image: 87fcad9721c8ef6436f623e4aee93666.jpg]

I have some problems understanding your reasoning, if you allow me. "And the only important thing in your life is keeping an imaginary sky-daddy happy so you get to go to the good place after you die. And the only important thing in your life is keeping an imaginary sky-daddy happy so you get to go to the good place after you die.", " I have personally witnessed the misery and evil that this mindset creates. I have witnessed families torn apart by parents who believe that god will send them to hell if they don't disown their children. I have witnessed the fear of children, praying to be "good enough" so they will get into heaven instead of burning."

Can you explain to me the nature of these theologically wrong bolded prepositions? It is becoming clear to me that you do not, in fact, "hate this madness called christianity", but you have made an idea of what christianity is (in your head) and you are attacking theology based on your own idea, not the original one. Can you read this? https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/glory2god...kalomiros/

Simples, theology is wrong. It is an exercise in rationalising the irrational fears and imaginings of stone age and bronze age people. Religions and gods are human creations they reflect the nature of their creators.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply
#20
RE: "heaven" meme on facebook
(April 29, 2016 at 9:54 am)Wryetui Wrote:
(April 29, 2016 at 9:46 am)Alex K Wrote: Theologically wrong according to whom? It's not like there is one "consensus theology" that a significant fraction of Christians agree upon. And even if- I'd wager that most real life Christians don't concern themselves much with what hair splitting theologians do in their learned works.

According to the theology of the early Church, that is still alive and well in what we call today the Orthodox Church, as well as in part of the Catholic Church and the Non-Chalcedonian Churches. That is the theology that existed from the beginning, that of the Capadoccian fathers and the other Church Fathers.

Your theology extends back ot the council of Nicea in 325ce. There are older christian theologies.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is there free will in Heaven? zwanzig 54 4264 April 12, 2021 at 1:35 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Eternity in Heaven - Scary? JairCrawford 47 5382 July 26, 2018 at 2:43 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  2011 post from Facebook regarding 2012 "rapture" Foxaèr 1 558 May 23, 2018 at 10:25 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Pope Francis -- dogs go to Heaven! Jehanne 34 5444 October 19, 2017 at 3:46 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  There is a difference between salvation, and the rewards of Heaven Drich 45 13554 July 31, 2017 at 9:27 am
Last Post: Drich
  Why do Christians want to go to Heaven? Fake Messiah 52 18927 June 28, 2017 at 9:29 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Are there animals in heaven? Mermaid 53 8232 November 7, 2015 at 3:25 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  My thoughts on heaven dyresand 24 7108 November 3, 2015 at 5:57 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Bible way to Heaven sinnerdaniel94 362 51642 October 14, 2015 at 3:41 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Heaven is full of tapeworms Brakeman 15 4505 August 13, 2015 at 10:23 am
Last Post: orangebox21



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)