Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 3:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bart Ehrman destroys Christianity in under 12 minutes.
RE: Bart Ehrman destroys Christianity in under 12 minutes.
(June 30, 2016 at 11:32 pm)Jehanne Wrote: And, so, there is substantial doubt about all of it.  We know that Jesus existed, that he was an historical figure during the early 1st century Palestine, but even then, the Romans did not bother to even mention his existence, let alone anyone else.  As such, it is reasonable to conclude that his influence on the cultural of his day was "unremarkable".  To me, this means that the Romans viewed him as yet another apocalyptic loon whom had a doomsday prophecy, and after his disturbance in the temple in Jerusalem (at the end of his ministry and not at the beginning, as John puts it), they arrested him, and some Roman official (probably, not even Pilate) sentenced him to die.  The rest, as they say, is "history".

Historians will tell you the same thing I'm about to tell you. To the Romans, Jesus was not worth mentioning. There were plenty of apocalyptic preachers of the time, and many thousands of people crucified under Roman rule (the vast majority of them with their identities never recorded). Look we don't really know how great his influence in Palestine was while he was alive, but we do know that he drew the attention of the Jewish authorities - and that he amassed great audiences at times. Pilate would almost certainly have been the one to sentence him to death, though not "at the request" of the Jewish "authorities". Note that even Josephus says that Jesus was executed by order of Pilate and there is no conflicting report, thus I'm not sure what your scepticism here is on?

There are at least four possibilities for what happened once Jesus was executed:

1. He died, was laid in the tomb, and was resurrected as Christians believe.
2. He died, was laid in the tomb, and reburied.
3. He was lifeless but had not died and revived in the tomb, and survived at least for a couple of days.
4. He died, was laid in the tomb, and the stone wasn't 'rolled away' on the third day by an angle.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK

The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK


"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Reply
RE: Bart Ehrman destroys Christianity in under 12 minutes.
(July 1, 2016 at 1:59 am)Aractus Wrote:
(June 30, 2016 at 11:32 pm)Jehanne Wrote: And, so, there is substantial doubt about all of it.  We know that Jesus existed, that he was an historical figure during the early 1st century Palestine, but even then, the Romans did not bother to even mention his existence, let alone anyone else.  As such, it is reasonable to conclude that his influence on the cultural of his day was "unremarkable".  To me, this means that the Romans viewed him as yet another apocalyptic loon whom had a doomsday prophecy, and after his disturbance in the temple in Jerusalem (at the end of his ministry and not at the beginning, as John puts it), they arrested him, and some Roman official (probably, not even Pilate) sentenced him to die.  The rest, as they say, is "history".

Historians will tell you the same thing I'm about to tell you. To the Romans, Jesus was not worth mentioning. There were plenty of apocalyptic preachers of the time, and many thousands of people crucified under Roman rule (the vast majority of them with their identities never recorded). Look we don't really know how great his influence in Palestine was while he was alive, but we do know that he drew the attention of the Jewish authorities - and that he amassed great audiences at times. Pilate would almost certainly have been the one to sentence him to death, though not "at the request" of the Jewish "authorities". Note that even Josephus says that Jesus was executed by order of Pilate and there is no conflicting report, thus I'm not sure what your scepticism here is on?

There are at least four possibilities for what happened once Jesus was executed:

1. He died, was laid in the tomb, and was resurrected as Christians believe.
2. He died, was laid in the tomb, and reburied.
3. He was lifeless but had not died and revived in the tomb, and survived at least for a couple of days.
4. He died, was laid in the tomb, and the stone wasn't 'rolled away' on the third day by an angle.

Other possibilities exist as well.  Professor John Dominic Crossan, a high respected scholar and co-founder of the Jesus Seminar, has advanced the hypothesis that Jesus' body was tossed into a common grave for criminals and/or eaten by wild dogs.  As you yourself admit, "Jesus was not worth mentioning", and therefore, it is very improbable that Pilate, even if he condemned Jesus himself, would have granted a request for a burial.  More here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burial_of_...istoricity
Reply
RE: Bart Ehrman destroys Christianity in under 12 minutes.
(July 1, 2016 at 1:49 am)Aractus Wrote:
(June 30, 2016 at 11:32 pm)Jehanne Wrote: And, then, these very early manuscripts were written at least a generation (40 years) after the death of Jesus

No they weren't. I find it near inconceivable that Matthew could have been written to Jewish Christians after the fall of Jerusalem. But let's ignore the gospels for a moment, we have at least two letters of paul that reliably date to 51-54 AD, and the Epistle of James which almost certainly was written before 50AD.

(June 30, 2016 at 11:32 pm)Jehanne Wrote: I would agree with you that the Gospels contain some of the words of the historical Jesus, but even scholars themselves cannot agree on which ones Jesus actually spoke!

Incorrect. The Sermon on the Mount is pretty much universally accepted as being genuinely delivered by Jesus, especially given the number of times James makes direct reference to it before any of the Christian gospels were written (he directly cites it something like 14-19 times, in addition to citing other things Jesus said as well). If he didn't give the Parables of the Rich Ruler and the Good Samaritan then it's up to you to prove where they came from, not up to me or others or Christians to prove it. I think that most sceptics would agree that the Parable of the Good Samaritan was one of Jesus's best teachings - if not the best. It was not at all aligned with the conventional wisdom of Judaism in the first century, which is what really makes it interesting.

That said, I don't think he ever claimed to be the Messiah. I'd agree with other sceptics that when Jesus talks about the "Son of Man" he is not referring to himself in the third-person, but rather looking towards the celestial being prophesied by Daniel. Those are great points of difference between us and Christians, but ultimately I'm forward looking, so of course it could one day be shown I'm wrong and that Jesus was referring to himself as the Son of Man - and if that was the case, as a sceptic, I have absolutely no explanation for it.

Certainly Q has been advanced as an historical source but the Gospel of Thomas is also a "sayings Gospel", like Q.  I will grant that the Sermon on the Mount contains some authentic sayings of Jesus, but it is not a true historical account; no one was there taking notes, as virtually everyone there was illiterate, and there is no evidence that the Gospels were first written in Aramaic, the language of Jesus, his followers and early 1st-century Palestine.  As far as the Gospel of Matthew, yours is truly a minority position, as most scholars date Matthew as being written between 75 and 100 AD:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_...g_and_date
Reply
RE: Bart Ehrman destroys Christianity in under 12 minutes.
So now we have descended to trotting out the Josephus fraud?

A historical jesus is no more vital to the story than a historical Hercules was.   Mythology does not work that way.
Reply
RE: Bart Ehrman destroys Christianity in under 12 minutes.
(July 1, 2016 at 8:18 pm)Minimalist Wrote: So now we have descended to trotting out the Josephus fraud?

A historical jesus is no more vital to the story than a historical Hercules was.   Mythology does not work that way.

The early medieval Christian's altering of Josephus is certainly a fine example of believers lying in the name of their religion.
Reply
RE: Bart Ehrman destroys Christianity in under 12 minutes.
Nothing compared to Eusebius' forgery of the whole passage.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bart Ehrman is an hero LinuxGal 44 2514 November 4, 2023 at 9:48 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Catholic churches profit under COVID PPP brewer 19 1333 February 23, 2021 at 2:47 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What do the conservative Christians here think of Professor Bart Ehrman? Jehanne 69 5793 March 8, 2019 at 10:44 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  No-one under 25 in iceland believes god created the universe downbeatplumb 8 1701 August 19, 2018 at 7:55 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Religious claims that get under your skin Abaddon_ire 59 7138 November 10, 2017 at 10:19 am
Last Post: emjay
  How Religion Destroys Families. Usalabs 41 7651 March 20, 2017 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  The Big Debate -- Price versus Ehrman Jehanne 43 9439 November 26, 2016 at 3:42 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Flood destroys Tony Perkins' house drfuzzy 14 2067 August 18, 2016 at 10:03 am
Last Post: brewer
  Bart Ehrman Has A New Book Coming Out Minimalist 20 3640 March 23, 2016 at 11:52 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Orthodox Christianity is Best Christianity! Annoyingbutnicetheist 30 6746 January 26, 2016 at 10:44 pm
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)