|
Which is more attractive? love or death?
|
Atlas,
Not everyone lies to their children regarding the inevitability of death. The most cruel handling of the situation is telling them there is life after death. 
"Which is more attractive?"
Boobs
Dying to live, living to die.
I believe both are interesting.
But not thinking about death is the best way to live. Humans dont want eternal life because then everything would be meaningless, nor they want to die. So what is it that humans want? To forget the fact that we will die. Eventually, we will simply die, but at least we did not think about it. This is why we fear terminal diseases such as cancer. Not only will you remember every morning that you may die soon, but you will feel immense pain. 
Love is more attractive than death.
But only because I'm not into necrophilia. 
Love is great! Death is nothing for the dead. Dying is fucked up!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
RE: Which is more attractive? love or death?
October 20, 2016 at 8:28 pm
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2016 at 8:30 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(October 20, 2016 at 7:54 pm)chimp3 Wrote: Love is great! "To love is to be delighted by the happiness of someone, or to experience pleasure upon the happiness of another. I define this as true love." - Lebiniz Quote: Death is nothing for the dead. "Death, therefore, the most awful of evils, is nothing to us, seeing that, when we are, death is not come, and, when death is come, we are not." - Epicurus Quote: Dying is fucked up! "Living people have a strong interest in promoting the idea that somehow life is sacred. You don't see Abbott and Costello running around, talking about this shit, do you? We're not hearing a whole lot from Mussolini on the subject. What's the latest from JFK? Not a god damned thing, cause JFK, Mussolini, and Abbott and Costello are fucking dead. They're fucking dead, and dead people give less than a shit about the sanctity of life. Only living people care about it, so the whole thing grows out of a completely biased point of view." - George Carlin Hastag Your Friendly AF Neighbourhood Quoting Man  (October 20, 2016 at 2:05 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:Are humans the only creatures with eyes?(October 20, 2016 at 1:46 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: Being torn apart by a pack of wolves or a bear would be quite the scene...buried by a land slide, not so much.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting, I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder  (October 21, 2016 at 2:22 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:(October 20, 2016 at 2:05 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Only if observed. And if you tell me god sees all I'm gonna have to smack ya.Are humans the only creatures with eyes? Yes? No? They are the only one's to make a determination that it is a "scene". Well, the only ones that I know of. You might know others.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
(October 21, 2016 at 2:25 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(October 21, 2016 at 2:22 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: Are humans the only creatures with eyes? For the wolves it's a buffet scene....and for the bugs.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting, I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder  RE: Which is more attractive? love or death?
October 21, 2016 at 3:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 21, 2016 at 3:40 pm by WinterHold.)
(October 20, 2016 at 1:35 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: If someone dies in the forest and no one else is ever there, does it make a scene? Yep, to the dying person at least. The crowed begins with the person themselves, sometimes that's the only observer death needs. Arkilogue My disagreeing would be on how the dear felines see it: it's just another meal. But to the observer -i.e:the person being chopped- it's quite a scene that artists and actors tried to mimic for thousands of years. Cato Santa, the tooth fairy, elves, I mean human societies did some big big lies; foretold it for years and years. Why are these fine, while the afterlife story isn't? It won't hurt to make a child believe in an afterlife,no. (#song note: It's not like we are alien to the lyrics. Neverland was always sold as a reality when I was a child. That thought made so many kids feel no guilt in calling X fat, or calling Y stupid, bulling zee and beating bee, everybody is going to Neverland after all, so no shame in acting that way). The disaster is fooling them to believe that they will go to heaven no matter what. A concept Christians were famous in teaching; get baptized and chill; heaven will be enough for all the chosen ones like you ! Not all Christians, Musllims do it too, not all of them. That's the crime. Though teaching kids about a death followed by judgement day that might lead them to hell, will mean a very different story. The Valkyrie Yes boobs rock ! But they're the perfect drug that clouds male humans from seeing reality: the warm boobs of a loved one dies too. Death loves to make a scene to them boobs too. Harsh, if you ask me. Macoleco Ignoring it is one way to live, a tactic if I could say? There are few tactics to face death though, the majority chooses this one, but to partially live life to the fullest, and almost a majority of mass hysteria when death comes, We are not promised a full life, and we will probably freak out when death comes. Despising that outcome, is what gives birth to taking other tactics into consideration. Lots of people hate the pre-death hysteria. Eternal life can be a nightmare, the boredom..but the God who made boredom, can unmake it also. Chimp3 If one believed in afterlife, it will mean something. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
