Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 2, 2016 at 8:03 am
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 8:05 am by robvalue.)
"True but irrelevant". No one can prove or disprove solipsism; neither does it make any practical difference. The assumption such people make is that they have some magic key out of the vat.
Presups are the most feeble kind of apologists. You can just as easily counter with the contradictory presup position; then what? Utterly pointless. It's a desperate retreat from reality.
I tend to just counter the whole thing by asking, "Why should I care about god? What difference does it make to anything?" The only actual responses I've had is:
(a) Wouldn't it be interesting? - Sure, yeah. If you could produce anything to study.
(b) Obey or burn! - Ah, threats. Finally the truth.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 2, 2016 at 8:06 am
Sye Ten Bruggenwhatshisface is proof that presups can reach levels of annoyingness that us mortals can only dream of.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 2, 2016 at 8:18 am
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 10:01 am by Crossless2.0.)
(November 1, 2016 at 4:52 pm)Stimbo Wrote: It would, however, seem preoposterous that, were I a brain in a vat experiencing what I imagine to be reality, I could have written all the great symphonies, created all of Kubrick's work, painted all Renaissance art etc.
Exactly. The 'brain-in-a-vat' position either requires that "you" are an astonishing imaginative genius (despite, I assume, your own sense of not being one) or you are the captive victim of some incredibly elaborate Matrix-style deception. Neither position helps the presuppositionalist in the least. So one of them appealing to solipsism as some sort of gotcha question only betrays how intellectually bankrupt their position really is.
They would have no need to embarrass themselves with such foolishness if the Biblical 'evidence' was half good to begin with. Protestants resorting to bad philosophy is the 'tell' that they really aren't that confident that a cogent case can be made in favor of the Christian historical narrative based on their 'divinely inspired' holy book alone. Hence the apologists' "throw as much shit against the wall and see what sticks" gambit to supply a supposedly cumulative case for their faith.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 2, 2016 at 12:26 pm
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 12:26 pm by Alex K.)
Yes, I find the brain in a vat idea (in the widest sense) very unconvincing because such a solipsistic world would not have to contain other beings with brains identical to my own avatar in this world with brain processes which are correlated with their cpnsciousnwss and equivalent with those of my avatar.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 5, 2016 at 5:43 pm
(November 2, 2016 at 8:06 am)Alex K Wrote: Sye Ten Bruggenwhatshisface is proof that presups can reach levels of annoyingness that us mortals can only dream of. I checked out Sye Ten debating Matt Dilahunty and he seems very arrogant and on the high end of the obnoxious spectrum. I also found who I think is the gold standard for annoying pressups. He is a fella who goes by the name "Darwins Deity", a real blessing for the atheist cause as he seems to annoy everyone he debates even his fellow Christians.
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 5, 2016 at 6:05 pm
(November 1, 2016 at 2:52 pm)amygdala Wrote: Hey all and welcome,
I ran into a presuppositionilist this week.
After a bit of back and forth with him going on about how I have to use reason to justify my beliefs I got hit with this question "How do you know that you are not a brain in a vat?"
This stumped me for a few moments, then I said to him "If I am a brain in a vat then why should I believe anything you say?, why should I believe you when you tell me that some book called the bible actually exists?".
I just went on asking him for proof that he was real, God was real and the bible was real and all not just a figment of my imagination.
He started to appeal to my reason that he and the God of the bible did exist which I thought it was quite funny.
I'm sure he could have countered my clumsy response in some way but it did feel good.
How do I know I am not a brain in a vat? My college education leaves me at moments like this and my pragmatic , blue collar Yankee forebearers speak through me when I answer " Because I am not a dumbass with too much time on my hands!". Some questions are just to stupid too waste a moment of life on. (As I type this I realize how much time I have wasted answering LilRik and GodsChild)
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 216
Threads: 15
Joined: April 15, 2015
Reputation:
4
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 5, 2016 at 11:51 pm
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2016 at 11:54 pm by TheoneandonlytrueGod.)
(November 1, 2016 at 2:52 pm)amygdala Wrote: "If I am a brain in a vat then why should I believe anything you say?
It doesn't matter whether or not your "brain is in a vat", in any case what you perceive is "real". My minor was in philosophy. In one class the professor wanted to know whether the "dream state," was the real reality or was the waking state real and how can one determine which is the real reality. I still don't know how to answer that one.
Still, it seems that the awake state seems to be the most likely of the two.
In any case it makes little difference since the perceptions will be the same regardless of the condition of the brain as long as there is some sort of devices that can detect outside phenomena and transmit those phenomena to the brain receptors.
Robert
Today is the best day of my life and tomorrow will be even better.
Posts: 66304
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
160
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 6, 2016 at 12:00 am
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 12:04 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Even if it's all "inside phenomena", as in the brain in the vat is just imagining it all, and not receiving transmissions from some "outside", the perception is the same.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 2692
Threads: 11
Joined: May 13, 2013
Reputation:
17
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 6, 2016 at 8:22 am
(November 1, 2016 at 2:52 pm)amygdala Wrote: Hey all and welcome,
I ran into a presuppositionilist this week.
After a bit of back and forth with him going on about how I have to use reason to justify my beliefs I got hit with this question "How do you know that you are not a brain in a vat?"
This stumped me for a few moments, then I said to him "If I am a brain in a vat then why should I believe anything you say?, why should I believe you when you tell me that some book called the bible actually exists?".
I just went on asking him for proof that he was real, God was real and the bible was real and all not just a figment of my imagination. Simple. Our brains are made of the same 'stuff' the 'real' is made of. That our senses are lying to us is semi-solipism.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool." - Richard P. Feynman
Posts: 13900
Threads: 262
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Encounter with a Presupp
November 6, 2016 at 8:32 am
(November 1, 2016 at 2:52 pm)amygdala Wrote: Hey all and welcome,
I ran into a presuppositionilist this week.
After a bit of back and forth with him going on about how I have to use reason to justify my beliefs I got hit with this question "How do you know that you are not a brain in a vat?"
This stumped me for a few moments, then I said to him "If I am a brain in a vat then why should I believe anything you say?, why should I believe you when you tell me that some book called the bible actually exists?".
I just went on asking him for proof that he was real, God was real and the bible was real and all not just a figment of my imagination.
He started to appeal to my reason that he and the God of the bible did exist which I thought it was quite funny.
I'm sure he could have countered my clumsy response in some way but it did feel good.
Brain in jars always makes me think of.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC3MGqY2J7g
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
|
