It's official, the election was stolen

[vorlon13]

and how Donna Brazile was co-opted to absolutely guaranty Bernie Sanders wasn't going to be the nominee . . .

[vorlon13]

and Bill Clinton was somehow induced to characterize Obamacare as crazy just a week or so before the election . . .

[vorlon13]

. . . and the liberal media was nevertheless compelled by the conspiracy to believe their own lies and the lying polling data to assure democrats the election was theirs regardless of whether or not they bothered to vote . . .

[The Grand Nudger]

-and with all of that, isn;t it amusing, had this targeted voter disenfranchisement not been validated, a different sort of turd may very well have floated to the top of the bowl?

(keep em coming, we'll only add to the incredible series of events that had to transpire to even give this vote scrubbing a -shot- at giving the republicans a win)

[GUBU]

I love it, atheist who doesn't believe in God due to the paucity of evidence immediately accepts election conspiracy without evidence.

If you read the article you'd see the evidence. But you'd rather live in fantasy land than believe your beloved far right party leaders are a bunch of traitors.

[Minimalist]

How about when the fucktards proudly admit it?

http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/11/7/...ck-turnout

Longtime Republican consultant Carter Wrenn, a fixture in North Carolina politics, said the GOP’s voter fraud argument is nothing more than an excuse.
“Of course it’s political. Why else would you do it?” he said, explaining that Republicans, like any political party, want to protect their majority. While GOP lawmakers might have passed the law to suppress some voters, Wrenn said, that does not mean it was racist.
“Look, if African Americans voted overwhelmingly Republican, they would have kept early voting right where it was,” Wrenn said. “It wasn’t about discriminating against African Americans. They just ended up in the middle of it because they vote Democrat.”

[Minimalist]

<Ahem>

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/us/wis...ss&emc=rss

Judges Find Redistricting Unfairly Favored Republicans

No Shit, Sherlocks!

[Cato]

I love it, atheist who doesn't believe in God due to the paucity of evidence immediately accepts election conspiracy without evidence.

If you read the article you'd see the evidence. But you'd rather live in fantasy land than believe your beloved far right party leaders are a bunch of traitors.

I don't deny the existence of the mechanisms reported; however, this is very different than someone actually being deprived of their vote. This has not been demonstrated let alone in numbers that would have 'stolen' the election. People systematically being denied a vote is as rare as those that actually commit voter fraud.

[Faith No More]

People systematically being denied a vote is as rare as those that actually commit voter fraud.

So you're saying the investigator in the article is lying?

[vorlon13]

If you read the article you'd see the evidence. But you'd rather live in fantasy land than believe your beloved far right party leaders are a bunch of traitors.

I don't deny the existence of the mechanisms reported; however, this is very different than someone actually being deprived of their vote. This has not been demonstrated let alone in numbers that would have 'stolen' the election. People systematically being denied a vote is as rare as those that actually commit voter fraud.

And it would have been amazingly fine tuned to have not targeted double the # of Black/Latino voters that voted for Romney that were going to vote for Trump, but not their next door neighbors that were going to vote for Hillary.

I guess we need a new term:

nano-gerrymandering