Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 16, 2024, 8:16 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
#21
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 21, 2016 at 8:39 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote:
(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Folks I am not falling for evolution, I just don’t take it seriously.
Science doesn't care if you believe in it or not.

I would have gone with, "Evolution don't give a shit."
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#22
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Quote:Even assuming the OP isn't a troll

Major league assumption there.
Reply
#23
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
If we were made from dust, why is there still dust? I'll leave this joker to the rest of you.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Reply
#24
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 21, 2016 at 9:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Even assuming the OP isn't a troll

Major league assumption there.

Yeah, but benefit of the doubt and all that bollocks. I heartily invite him to prove me wrong.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#25
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Microevolution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microevolution
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#26
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Go learn something and stop wasting our time.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#27
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 21, 2016 at 10:00 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(November 21, 2016 at 9:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Major league assumption there.

Yeah, but benefit of the doubt and all that bollocks. I heartily invite him to prove me wrong.

He hasn't got time to prove you wrong, what with that bridge to live under and all those goats to deal with...

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#28
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
Wtf is it with all the theists using big bold fonts nowadays?


(November 21, 2016 at 6:33 pm)The Joker Wrote: Folks I am not falling for evolution, I just don’t take it seriously.  If an idea is not testable, repeatable, observable, and falsifiable, it is not considered scientific, evolution is not science but a philosophical assumption a belief just like creationism.

Evolution is not
·        Testable
·        Repeatable
·        Observable
·        Falsifiable
Therefore evolution is not scientific

Demonstrate that evolution is not testable, repeatable, observable or falsifiable.

We can test for it by cross breeding animals, which has been done for centuries with cattle, chickens, foxes and dogs for example. This can be repeated. It has been observed both in nature and with genetic algorithms. It is falsifiable in that you could demonstrate that what we are observing works by means other than inherited traits, mutation of genetic information and natural selection.
Reply
#29
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 21, 2016 at 9:36 pm)Fireball Wrote: If we were made from dust, why is there still dust? I'll leave this joker to the rest of you.

I wish there wasn't dust. It sets my nose off.
Reply
#30
RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
(November 22, 2016 at 5:08 am)Mathilda Wrote: Wtf is it with all the theists using big bold fonts nowadays?

They think it's adding emphasis and power to their argument to make it more convincing. In reality, it's causing people to skip over them and ignore them.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 6579 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Foxaèr
  Why did Communists promote Evolution? Nishant Xavier 318 15847 September 7, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not? Nishant Xavier 91 4890 August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  The fascinating asymmetry of theist-atheist discussion Astreja 5 444 July 22, 2023 at 8:02 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  I'm no longer an anti-theist Duty 27 1990 September 16, 2022 at 1:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  I received a letter from a theist, need a good reply Radamand 22 2011 March 22, 2022 at 10:56 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Why do theist often drop the letter s when referring to atheists? I_am_not_mafia 56 11876 August 23, 2018 at 4:20 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 148772 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  Why was Newton a theist? Alexmahone 65 12741 March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  Why America is anti-theist. Goosebump 3 1098 March 1, 2018 at 9:06 am
Last Post: mlmooney89



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)