Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 4:29 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Question about Evolution
#11
RE: Question about Evolution
Couldn't a case be made for at least some 'moments' of "punctuated equilibrium"?

Could it not be mostly tiny strokes over lots of time, with isolated episodes of large strokes happening very quickly?
Reply
#12
RE: Question about Evolution
(November 30, 2016 at 11:44 am)alpha male Wrote:
(November 29, 2016 at 8:48 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Mutation is the raw material, natural selection acts upon mutation.

Suppose a fish is hatched with a mutation that provides ever-so-slightly better oxygen extraction.  The mutation itself is thoroughly random, but it provides a benefit that may make that particular fish better able to adapt and to breed than some of its cousins.  Since mutations occur at the genetic level, this new trait will be passed on to some of the mutated fish's young.  The fish that inherit this trait will be 'fitter' and more likely to survive and breed.  The mutation (random) has thus been selected for (non-random).

Good question.

Boru

Good explanation, except for the "ever-so-slightly" part. Such a mutation would likely be lost in the shuffle.

Except such mutations haven't been lost in the shuffle quite many times.
Reply
#13
RE: Question about Evolution
Also important to remember that evolution deals in mutations across populations, not individuals.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#14
RE: Question about Evolution
Also notice that mutations aren't all good. Most do not help, even hinder the beings lives in the environment. Those individuals with 'bad' mutations breed much less than the others. Those get selected out. Over time and in populations.
Reply
#15
RE: Question about Evolution
(November 29, 2016 at 9:15 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: On the other hand, if a mutation causes a deer to be colored "Hunter's orange" he's a deader, because that's like a red cape to a fighting bull for hunters.  Wink

[Image: bummer+birthmark.jpg]
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#16
RE: Question about Evolution
(November 30, 2016 at 11:44 am)alpha male Wrote:
(November 29, 2016 at 8:48 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Mutation is the raw material, natural selection acts upon mutation.

Suppose a fish is hatched with a mutation that provides ever-so-slightly better oxygen extraction.  The mutation itself is thoroughly random, but it provides a benefit that may make that particular fish better able to adapt and to breed than some of its cousins.  Since mutations occur at the genetic level, this new trait will be passed on to some of the mutated fish's young.  The fish that inherit this trait will be 'fitter' and more likely to survive and breed.  The mutation (random) has thus been selected for (non-random).

Good question.

Boru

Good explanation, except for the "ever-so-slightly" part. Such a mutation would likely be lost in the shuffle.

That's not really how it works, though. If even marginally beneficial mutations were 'lost in the shuffle', there would be no natural selection at all. Since natural selection is an observed fact, then even small mutations are preserved (beneficial ones, at least).

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#17
RE: Question about Evolution
(November 30, 2016 at 1:52 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: That's not really how it works, though.
We don't know how it really works, but mathematical models have been created. IIRC Haldane was the first, and came up with a probability of fixation of 2s, where s is the reproductive advantage given by the mutation. More complex models for different population dynamics have been produced since. Genetic drift can cause beneficial mutations to be lost, and deleterious mutations to fix, despite the effects of natural selection. That isn't a creationist position.
Quote:If even marginally beneficial mutations were 'lost in the shuffle', there would be no natural selection at all. Since natural selection is an observed fact, then even small mutations are preserved (beneficial ones, at least).
WTF? Saying that small beneficial mutations can be lost in the shuffle doesn't preclude natural selection, as:
- Not all are lost in the shuffle
- That doesn't preclude the possibility of mutations with larger benefit

I mean, really, your logic there is just a WTF moment.
Reply
#18
RE: Question about Evolution
(November 30, 2016 at 2:39 pm)alpha male Wrote:
(November 30, 2016 at 1:52 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: That's not really how it works, though.
We don't know how it really works, but mathematical models have been created. IIRC Haldane was the first, and came up with a probability of fixation of 2s, where s is the reproductive advantage given by the mutation. More complex models for different population dynamics have been produced since. Genetic drift can cause beneficial mutations to be lost, and deleterious mutations to fix, despite the effects of natural selection. That isn't a creationist position.
Quote:If even marginally beneficial mutations were 'lost in the shuffle', there would be no natural selection at all. Since natural selection is an observed fact, then even small mutations are preserved (beneficial ones, at least).
WTF? Saying that small beneficial mutations can be lost in the shuffle doesn't preclude natural selection, as:
- Not all are lost in the shuffle
- That doesn't preclude the possibility of mutations with larger benefit

I mean, really, your logic there is just a WTF moment.

Maybe we're talking at odds about what we mean by 'small' and 'large' mutations. Probably my own fault, as I'm used to talking with creationists who look upon 'mutation' as the sudden appearance, for example, of a fully functioning eye.

By 'marginal' I mean a mutation which imparts a small - but still measurable - advantage to a particular organism. Sorry for the confusion.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#19
RE: Question about Evolution
(November 30, 2016 at 12:40 pm)Ignorant Wrote: Couldn't a case be made for at least some 'moments' of "punctuated equilibrium"?

Could it not be mostly tiny strokes over lots of time, with isolated episodes of large strokes happening very quickly?


In fact some tiny stokes have big time effects.  When you look at how embryos develop it seems as if one possible mutation is simply to change the number of iterations of a set of limbs.  That could make a pretty noticeable difference in a single generation.  But I imagine the odds of such a mutation being advantageous are probably even thinner since an optimal number of limbs has probably already been achieved.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Quick question about evolution Yoo 29 3259 August 28, 2016 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  A unresolved question about evolution marianomanto 6 1483 October 5, 2015 at 7:53 am
Last Post: marianomanto
  Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution. Mystic 59 30128 April 6, 2013 at 5:12 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Demolition of the theory of evolution in the 20 question Attractive boulevards 26 15935 June 26, 2009 at 2:41 pm
Last Post: chatpilot
  One billion A.D. A question for evolution fans. Darwinian 30 10417 December 17, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)