Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 23, 2024, 1:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
To pacify or not to pacify
#11
RE: To pacify or not to pacify
If your daughter, beautiful name btw, doesn't like them, why do you keep trying tout give her one? Honestly curious.
Forgive my misunderstanding, apparently I don't get the point of this thread, lol.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?” 
― Tom StoppardRosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
Reply
#12
RE: To pacify or not to pacify
(December 10, 2016 at 5:26 pm)Alex K Wrote: You mean the Ferber method or the fake tits? Big Grin
Tongue
“Love is the only bow on Life’s dark cloud. It is the morning and the evening star. It shines upon the babe, and sheds its radiance on the quiet tomb. It is the mother of art, inspirer of poet, patriot and philosopher.

It is the air and light of every heart – builder of every home, kindler of every fire on every hearth. It was the first to dream of immortality. It fills the world with melody – for music is the voice of love.

Love is the magician, the enchanter, that changes worthless things to Joy, and makes royal kings and queens of common clay. It is the perfume of that wondrous flower, the heart, and without that sacred passion, that divine swoon, we are less than beasts; but with it, earth is heaven, and we are gods.” - Robert. G. Ingersoll


Reply
#13
RE: To pacify or not to pacify
(December 10, 2016 at 6:07 pm)Aroura Wrote: If your daughter, beautiful name btw, doesn't like them, why do you keep trying tout give her one? Honestly curious.
Forgive my misunderstanding, apparently I don't get the point of this thread, lol.

Because as a first time dad, doubts arise over those critters that are so deliciously looking.

We do not impose them on her. It is the common culture that babies need them. Its what I am discussing. Basicly we addict a baby to that only to remove it later.
Reply
#14
RE: To pacify or not to pacify
As I said, so far, ours uses it effectively to calm herself down in some situations, but doesn't need it and get it all the time, and I would like it to stay that way. Maybe we can have a pacifier in some instances without her becoming reliant on having it all the time, so far it seems to work.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#15
RE: To pacify or not to pacify
(December 10, 2016 at 4:06 pm)Aroura Wrote: We had this goal not to use one, but ended up using one because a nurse told me that babies who sleep with pacifiers are less likely to suffer SIDS. I don't even know if it's true, I just took her word for it at the time.
I breastfed for more than 18 months, and she still liked her pacifier.  It was not hard to ween her from it, only took a week or so, gone before she was 2. Did no damage.

So I'd just say it's personal choice. The only bad thing I remember was having to always have a backup, in case one was lost or fell in the dirt or something.

That actually IS true, though researchers aren't sure why.   My own personal opinion after an...interesting and enlightening first 2 years is this:

Whether it's pacifiers, breast feeding, co-sleeping, etc...You do what works best for YOUR family (so long as it's safe of course) and screw what anyone else says!  If the little one likes them and it calms her down/helps her sleep, go for it.  Your sanity is top priority.  Personally, we tried the pacifier many times with Christopher but he just never cared for it.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
#16
RE: To pacify or not to pacify
My kid had one for at least a year.
My favourite was this one I bought that had a drawn on thick moustache.
It looks so funny on a baby girl.
My ex didn't have much of a sense of humour so it didn't see the light of day too much.
Reply
#17
RE: To pacify or not to pacify
Oh, my !



MANASSAS, Va. –  A Virginia woman has been charged with child abuse after authorities say she tried to calm a 3-month-old baby by administering the opiate methadone.
The Manassas City Police Department said Friday that the baby was admitted to a local hospital on Dec. 3 in respiratory distress. Tests showed the infant was under the influence of methadone, which is used for controlling opioid addiction.
Police spokeswoman Adrienne Helms tells the Washington Post an investigation revealed 31-year-old Jessica F. Nicholson orally administered the drug in an attempt to calm the baby.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#18
RE: To pacify or not to pacify
Maybe she should have tried a binky (pacifier) first. Gawd people are so fucking stupid.

Savannah had one. But only because she started getting colicky and I needed sleep. Then she wouldn't part with it. I tried everything. Finally, I told her that if she wanted to go to school (pre-k), she had to stop using it. She handed it over.

Jordan just sucked on her thumb. Even in the womb. So she came with a built-in pacifier. Sucked on her thumb for several years. When she got tired, she would do that. It was our message that she wanted sleep.

She was 14 when she finally stopped.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)