Hilary wanted to rig the Palestian elections

[CapnAwesome]

Okay, is there some actual proof that it was Russia that did the hacking?

Enough to convince the FBI and CIA but I am not privy to their sources.

The same geniuses who told us there were WMD in Iraq, right? It's all pointless, the Russians didn't rig the election. They (or whoever) just revealed information on Hillary Clinton that we should have the right to know anyway. Hillary's email could have been hacked and it revealed that she was a good honest politician. It didn't, it revealed or to be corrupt. It's like saying the guy who leaked Trump's tax returns was rigging the election.

[Minimalist]

I was going to put this in its own thread, Capn...but you convinced me that it belongs right here.

[CanOfMountainDew]

I was going to put this in its own thread, Capn...but you convinced me that it belongs right here.

>Implying cable news is anything other then extreme left wing propaganda
>just lol

[Minimalist]

Thanks for proving the point, jerkoff.

---

Alright.  I have to go cook sauce for my wife's lasagna.

L8r boys.

[CanOfMountainDew]

Thanks for proving the point, jerkoff.

---

Alright.  I have to go cook sauce for my wife's lasagna.

L8r boys.

You're hilarious. Myself, and all my friends, are liberals. We all just happen to recognise that american media is predominantly left wing. You're the useful idiot that the dems love.

[CapnAwesome]

Thanks for proving the point, jerkoff.

---

Alright.  I have to go cook sauce for my wife's lasagna.

L8r boys.

You're hilarious. Myself, and all my friends, are liberals. We all just happen to recognise that american media is predominantly left wing. You're the useful idiot that the dems love.

According to Liberals the New York times opinion page is middle of the road and the Huffington post is non-biased. They think there is no such thing as liberal news.

[CanOfMountainDew]

You're hilarious. Myself, and all my friends, are liberals. We all just happen to recognise that american media is predominantly left wing. You're the useful idiot that the dems love.

According to Liberals the New York times opinion page is middle of the road and the Huffington post is non-biased. They think there is no such thing as liberal news.

Huffpo and NYT are the lefts equivalent to FOX. Anyone who watches mainstream media uncritically is simply a useful idiot for the left.

[Crossless2.0]

According to Liberals the New York times opinion page is middle of the road and the Huffington post is non-biased. They think there is no such thing as liberal news.

Huffpo and NYT are the lefts equivalent to FOX. Anyone who watches mainstream media uncritically is simply a useful idiot for the left.

You are aware that there is more to the New York Times than the op-ed page, right? Have you ever bothered to read it?

Not skim it. Read it. Consistently.

To compare that to the Huffington Post or to suggest that it's the leftist equivalent of Fox News is the height of moronic.

For the record, I read the Times and the WSJ daily. What they do is called journalism. You should try reading some.

[CapnAwesome]

According to Liberals the New York times opinion page is middle of the road and the Huffington post is non-biased. They think there is no such thing as liberal news.

Huffpo and NYT are the lefts equivalent to FOX. Anyone who watches mainstream media uncritically is simply a useful idiot for the left.

The mainstream media is a giant and diverse thing. Some of it leans right and some of it leans left. I think to say all the mainstream media is left wing is just as dumb as saying none of it is.

---

Huffpo and NYT are the lefts equivalent to FOX. Anyone who watches mainstream media uncritically is simply a useful idiot for the left.

You are aware that there is more to the New York Times than the op-ed page, right? Have you ever bothered to read it?

Not skim it. Read it. Consistently.

To compare that to the Huffington Post or to suggest that it's the leftist equivalent of Fox News is the height of moronic.

For the record, I read the Times and the WSJ daily. What they do is called journalism. You should try reading some.

Lol, I know you are replying to CanOfMountainDew, which is why I specified the Op-ed page. I think maybe he's had one too many mountain dews this morning.

[Crossless2.0]

Yeah, Cap'n', you got included in the quote. I was definitely addressing my remarks to Dewy.