Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 4:53 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rogue One
#51
RE: Rogue One
(December 30, 2016 at 4:17 pm)Aroura Wrote:
(December 30, 2016 at 4:01 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Just watched it... Liked it... here I found a nice video that describes how I liked it:






OOOPPPs, wrong universe!
What?! weren't you guys talking about universes?

Was I the only one who looked at the rag-tag team on Rogue One (the ship) and thought "Red shirts! Where are the red shirts?!!" ?
That's because they were the Red Shirts! lol

They were... but they weren't wearing the red shirts! Tongue
Reply
#52
RE: Rogue One
I liked it, they kept the action going at the expense of too much exposition. The storyline was the standard Star Wars formula but the CGI was outstanding, and the ability to bring Peter Cushing and --sadly-- Carrie Fisher back to life was astounding. It wasn't enough to fool the eye, but damn... it was pretty close.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
#53
RE: Rogue One
(December 30, 2016 at 5:45 pm)Tonus Wrote: I liked it, they kept the action going at the expense of too much exposition.  The storyline was the standard Star Wars formula but the CGI was outstanding, and the ability to bring Peter Cushing and --sadly-- Carrie Fisher back to life was astounding.  It wasn't enough to fool the eye, but damn... it was pretty close.

The people who went with me and didn't remember "A New Hope" couldn't tell it was a CGI Peter Cushing! So there's that!
Reply
#54
RE: Rogue One
Yeah I wondered how they would do tarkin (he has to be in this film) I figured it would be CGI of some sort but yeah wasn't expecting it to be that good
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
#55
RE: Rogue One
(December 29, 2016 at 10:11 am)Jehanne Wrote:
(December 29, 2016 at 12:38 am)Aroura Wrote: I really enjoyed it, but my husband felt this way, I think.

I did feel the first half of the movie was a bit disjointed and drawn out.  I thought the intro scenes were gripping, I was enthralled, but honestly had a hard time with the planet hopping and story for a while, though this was partly due to my terrible vision IRL and the fact we were forced to sit pretty close to the screen as the theater was pretty packed.

As someone who has seen all of the Star Wars films so far, all the planet-hopping at the beginning with the sub-titles was confusing!  But, the recency-effect  prevailed, and the cool ending made-up for it!  I am a bit of a romantic, and so, seeing the heroine and hero die in each others arms was touching.  The line directed at them, "May the force be with you..." certainly appealed to the many theists in the audience!  As an atheist, it was touching enough to see them die together in a warm embrace.  This is one reason why I prefer Star Trek over Star Wars, as the latter has too much "woo-woo" in it.

If I had any intention of seeing this film, I would hate you for that spoiler. As it is, though, no harm, no foul. Smile

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#56
RE: Rogue One
(December 30, 2016 at 5:48 pm)pocaracas Wrote:
(December 30, 2016 at 5:45 pm)Tonus Wrote: I liked it, they kept the action going at the expense of too much exposition.  The storyline was the standard Star Wars formula but the CGI was outstanding, and the ability to bring Peter Cushing and --sadly-- Carrie Fisher back to life was astounding.  It wasn't enough to fool the eye, but damn... it was pretty close.

The people who went with me and didn't remember "A New Hope" couldn't tell it was a CGI Peter Cushing! So there's that!

Guys, serious question.
Do you think they went to the trouble of giving Forest Whitaker a CGI second eye?
I couldn't tell!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#57
RE: Rogue One
(December 30, 2016 at 6:10 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(December 29, 2016 at 10:11 am)Jehanne Wrote: As someone who has seen all of the Star Wars films so far, all the planet-hopping at the beginning with the sub-titles was confusing!  But, the recency-effect  prevailed, and the cool ending made-up for it!  I am a bit of a romantic, and so, seeing the heroine and hero die in each others arms was touching.  The line directed at them, "May the force be with you..." certainly appealed to the many theists in the audience!  As an atheist, it was touching enough to see them die together in a warm embrace.  This is one reason why I prefer Star Trek over Star Wars, as the latter has too much "woo-woo" in it.

If I had any intention of seeing this film, I would hate you for that spoiler.  As it is, though, no harm, no foul.  Smile

Boru

In my OP, I did try to "warn" everyone that there may be spoilers in this thread!  Still, knowing the end will not spoil the movie, not at all.  In fact, I am going to watch it a second and final time when it comes over to Amazon video in two or three years.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)