Our server costs ~$33 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: 22nd January 2017, 16:20

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
#51
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
(11th January 2017, 14:35)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Oh, and what errors do you suspect in my advertisement strategy?

Compare your posts to my picture I just linked. I thought that was clear already.
Reply
#52
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
(11th January 2017, 14:35)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(11th January 2017, 14:25)Stimbo Wrote: If he did, it can't have been for long. The idea of advertising is actually to sell the product.

Oh, and what errors do you suspect in my advertisement strategy?
How shall I purge such suspected errors?

Because you communicate nothing of substance and seem incapable of assessing feedback. Two essential qualities for a communications industry such as advertising.

As to your latter question, purging yourself of these errors is not possible without a healthy dose of introspection, which you have most certainly not demonstrated to anyone here.

Basically, build a bridge and get over yourself.

(11th January 2017, 14:35)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(11th January 2017, 14:23)Stimbo Wrote: I don't care about your prior responses to other people. You're talking to me now. Are you capable of holding a polite conversation without resorting to cookie-cutter deepity non-answers?

[Image: JYrZOW4.jpg]

Ironically, I tend to analyse prior responses, such that I may respond politely absent deepities /non-answers.

INCORRECT.

Irony only applies in this situation if any statement or question I gave can be shown to be ironic. What others may have said and how you may have judged them is irrelevant in my interaction with you, and is a form of the association fallacy mated with a red herring.

Do you want another go?
Please read and abide by the Forum Rules, available here.


(21st June 2016, 07:31)Homeless Nutter Wrote: When someone is knocked on the head, they may see stars. That doesn't mean we should rely on their testimony, when studying astrophysics...
Reply
#53
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)


I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
#54
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
[Image: sA6PAz9.jpg]

(11th January 2017, 14:50)Stimbo Wrote: INCORRECT.

Irony only applies in this situation if any statement or question I gave can be shown to be ironic. What others may have said and how you may have judged them is irrelevant in my interaction with you, and is a form of the association fallacy mated with a red herring.

Do you want another go?

Yes, it is ironic, for your statement contained irony; you appeared to have accused another of 'non-answers', whence it was your expression that was non-answer bound, on the horizon of your ignorance of priorly intentionally unread posts.

In other words, your answers did not reflect that of prior posts, which you intentionally ignored. (As you prior mentioned)

Albeit, you are still yet to express the errors in non-beliefism's premise sequence.
I am but a casual body builder/software engineer (see my body in image below)

★ I am the creator of "non-beliefism". (http://nonbeliefism.com/) ★

[Image: jajybkV.jpg]

★ more body images: https://www.facebook.com/ProgrammingGodJordan


Reply
#55
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
No, my answers contained substance; read them again. Other people picked up on them. I can only draw one conclusion as to why you did not, and it isn't very flattering to you.

My answers "did not reflect prior posts", because I am not responsible for any prior fucking posts, nanobrain. Nor did I "intentionally ignore" them; I am not having someone else's conversation with you. You are displaying breathtaking dishonesty, which is a shame; it totally undermines whatever points you are trying to make. Basically, you are trying far too hard to belittle your interlocutors. One wonders why? (Now that was irony.)

When you have worked through your little condescension tantrum and feel like talking like a grown-up, I'll be here.
Please read and abide by the Forum Rules, available here.


(21st June 2016, 07:31)Homeless Nutter Wrote: When someone is knocked on the head, they may see stars. That doesn't mean we should rely on their testimony, when studying astrophysics...
Reply
#56
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
(11th January 2017, 14:14)Stimbo Wrote: Individuals can be logical. The species as a whole tends not to be so.

Are you done being arrogant yet?

He still hasn't learned the definition of "especially" and "may", I doubt he understands "can" either.

He seems to think that "beliefs may be logical" means "beliefs necessarily are logical" and he seems to think that "especially religious belief" means "only religious belief".

So yeah... I think he needs to program himself some English.
(12th January 2017, 11:33)Tazzycorn Wrote:
(12th January 2017, 11:16)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Those who compare God to the tooth fairy are douchebags.
True that, at least the Tooth Fairy gives you something in return for your belief and sacrifical offerings. When was the last time god ever did anything for anyone?
"You don't change the world by staying at home and being good" - Mooney
"I reserve the right to be irrational"
― Gemini
Reply
#57
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
Therefore wherein ergo betwixt and between. Do I sound wise? Come and join my cult.
Please read and abide by the Forum Rules, available here.


(21st June 2016, 07:31)Homeless Nutter Wrote: When someone is knocked on the head, they may see stars. That doesn't mean we should rely on their testimony, when studying astrophysics...
Reply
#58
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
Epiphenomenologicality.

I am therefore Jesus.
(12th January 2017, 11:33)Tazzycorn Wrote:
(12th January 2017, 11:16)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Those who compare God to the tooth fairy are douchebags.
True that, at least the Tooth Fairy gives you something in return for your belief and sacrifical offerings. When was the last time god ever did anything for anyone?
"You don't change the world by staying at home and being good" - Mooney
"I reserve the right to be irrational"
― Gemini
Reply
#59
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
(10th January 2017, 10:00)Alex K Wrote: [It's bad enough that I had to switch from LaTeX to MS Office for work X-|

Ouch. That must have been more painful than when I had to take my journal paper and put in loads of American misspellings to fit in with APA's strict style. I had to buy a whole book just on their style of formatting. It was a relief when I made my own version to put on the website and I could correct it all again.

Anyway, too busy writing a paper to argue with PGJ.

I'm currently putting the last touches to a paper that I started writing in 2013 and started designing and coding in 2010. I have very little processing power and can only work on it in my spare time but I feel good about submitting it this Sunday night. All I had to do was download the conference's style file and re-run latex.
Ignore list: Neo-Scholastic
Reply
#60
RE: ★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)
(11th January 2017, 15:46)Alasdair Ham Wrote:
(11th January 2017, 14:14)Stimbo Wrote: Individuals can be logical. The species as a whole tends not to be so.

Are you done being arrogant yet?

He still hasn't learned the definition of "especially" and "may", I doubt he understands "can" either.

He seems to think that "beliefs may be logical" means "beliefs necessarily are logical" and he seems to think that "especially religious belief" means "only religious belief".

So yeah... I think he needs to program himself some English.

(1)

Invalid.

Ironically, non-beliefism premise-2, stipulates clearly, that belief is illogical:

http://non-beliefism-info.appspot.com/no...uence.html

Prior quote of mine via PAGE 5:

ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:Let us break it down:

(1) Belief has the probability of containing non-science/nonsense. 
(ie belief MAY contain non-science)


(2) Logic/science does not have the probability of containing non-science.
(ie logic/science MAY NOT contain non-science)

(3) ie.... scientific-evidence does not have the probability of containing non-scientific-evidence.
(ie scientific evidence MAY NOT contain non-scientific evidence)

(4) So belief is illogical.
(ie belief MAY contain non-science, where as logic/science can't contain non-science, so belief is clearly illogical)

.
.
.
Prior quote of mine via PAGE 3:

ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: 
Non-beliefism/basis[ii]:

Belief may constitute non-science.

Logic/science in contrast, shan’t encode non-science.

…ie scientific evidence shan’t contain non-scientific-evidence.

Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(2)

In contrast, it is observable, that faith bound belief, is of supposedly absolute nature; ie theists supposedly believe in Gods.

At that juncture, the human race is inherently atheistic, for humanity regards events as probable, rather than true/absolute, as far as science prescribes.
I am but a casual body builder/software engineer (see my body in image below)

★ I am the creator of "non-beliefism". (http://nonbeliefism.com/) ★

[Image: jajybkV.jpg]

★ more body images: https://www.facebook.com/ProgrammingGodJordan


Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I was wrong about the simple choice. MysticKnight 42 989 3rd January 2017, 13:12
Last Post: Asmodee
  It's a simple choice: MysticKnight 72 1664 31st December 2016, 15:12
Last Post: Astreja
  If someone says science can't explain everything what's the best way to repond? ReptilianPeon 94 4413 14th December 2016, 12:03
Last Post: Asmodee
  How to become a God, in 3 simple steps (absent faith/belief): ProgrammingGodJordan 91 2794 28th November 2016, 21:08
Last Post: ProgrammingGodJordan
  A Thousand Gods? chimp3 22 645 19th October 2016, 19:39
Last Post: Khemikal
  Dalai Lama says that terrorists have no religion Aegon 12 477 28th September 2016, 02:58
Last Post: InsaneDane
  False pagan gods are not the True ones? theBorg 88 3022 17th August 2016, 09:39
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Why did we stop inventing gods? Greatest I am 58 1861 16th August 2016, 12:33
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  Bill Maher Says It. Tax the Fucking Churches! Minimalist 29 1636 20th April 2016, 04:36
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  If someone says to me "consciousness, therefore god", what's the best way to respond? ReptilianPeon 56 4134 9th March 2016, 07:02
Last Post: Tazzycorn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)