Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 11:08 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Human Devolution
RE: Human Devolution
Tell you what Pulse, have god show up and tell me how it was done. If it can do all of the miraculous design stuff you claim then it should be a snap for it to make a simple appearance. 

That's the only way I'll believe.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
RE: Human Devolution
(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote:
(January 20, 2017 at 9:46 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Guess what, chuckles? See those little blue numbers in the wiki text? Know what they mean? They're citations, and they link directly to the relevant scientific papers where you can learn more about the background to this stuff. Or do you think that scientists just make up what the hell they like and post it on wikipedia?

Dear Stimbo, I have a science degree, and trust me, when it comes to origins, its all guess work as you can see from the terminology that these papers use. You have to think for your self Stimbo, Question Everything, don't let the High Priests of Scientism tell you what to believe about the origins of cellular nano machinery, they are guessing despite their use of "big words". Don't be one of the "sheeple", think for yourself. And please do not quote me half way and delete the rest,

I have already cited one paper about the  uncertainty of abiogenesis, there's Plenty more!
I'm curious why you deleted half my post in your quote.

I have a degree in truthology and therefore am best placed to know what is real and what isn't.

Ask away.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Human Devolution
Not bad dbp!

I also have a degree in Solipsism.
[Image: 1i2puj.jpg]
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
RE: Human Devolution
(January 21, 2017 at 8:46 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: Dear Stimbo, I have a science degree, and trust me, when it comes to origins, its all guess work as you can see from the terminology that these papers use. You have to think for your self Stimbo, Question Everything, don't let the High Priests of Scientism tell you what to believe about the origins of cellular nano machinery, they are guessing despite their use of "big words". Don't be one of the "sheeple", think for yourself. And please do not quote me half way and delete the rest,

I have already cited one paper about the  uncertainty of abiogenesis, there's Plenty more!
I'm curious why you deleted half my post in your quote.

I have a degree in truthology and therefore am best placed to know what is real and what isn't.

Ask away.

What is best in life?
Reply
RE: Human Devolution
(January 21, 2017 at 9:00 am)LastPoet Wrote:
(January 21, 2017 at 8:46 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: I have a degree in truthology and therefore am best placed to know what is real and what isn't.

Ask away.

What is best in life?

Having a pain free, care free day in the company of people you love.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Human Devolution
(January 20, 2017 at 5:59 pm)Pulse Wrote: I do look to creation dot com for much information, I haven't linked to them because for 30 days am not allowed to link after registration, but yes, I am very open about going to creation 

dot com for information, I have found them very helpful in my pursuit of truth and are they staffed by capable scientists, mostly with Doctorates. I do of course look to other sites as well, I will try to make that more 

clear despite not being allowed to link for another month or so, I apologise for any confusion in not making things clearer.

So not alone are you a lying shitstain on the arse of humanity, you're a plagarising lying shitstain on the arse of humanity. Your parents must be proud.

(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote:
(January 20, 2017 at 9:46 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Guess what, chuckles? See those little blue numbers in the wiki text? Know what they mean? They're citations, and they link directly to the relevant scientific papers where you can learn more about the background to this stuff. Or do you think that scientists just make up what the hell they like and post it on wikipedia?

Dear Stimbo, I have a science degree, and trust me, when it comes to origins, its all guess work as you can see from the terminology that these papers use. You have to think for your self Stimbo, Question Everything, don't let the High Priests of Scientism tell you what to believe about the origins of cellular nano machinery, they are guessing despite their use of "big words". Don't be one of the "sheeple", think for yourself. And please do not quote me half way and delete the rest,

I have already cited one paper about the  uncertainty of abiogenesis, there's Plenty more!
I'm curious why you deleted half my post in your quote.

Where were you awarded it, from one of those games where you try and pick the prize out with a pincer?
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply
RE: Human Devolution
(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: Dear Stimbo, I have a science degree,

Really? Now that's interesting, because for all your talk about thinking for oneself and questioning the dogma, almost everything you've posted here has been lifted from creationist websites. Your credentials don't impress me if your data is known to be erroneous.

(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: and trust me, when it comes to origins, its all guess work as you can see from the terminology that these papers use.

It's things like this which make me not believe you about your science degree. You deride the language of the papers yet ignore the data. Why?

(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: You have to think for your self Stimbo, Question Everything, don't let the High Priests of Scientism tell you what to believe about the origins of cellular nano machinery, they are guessing despite their use of "big words". Don't be one of the "sheeple", think for yourself.

This from the creation.org fan.

(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: And please do not quote me half way and delete the rest,

Did I misrepresent you? Then report me.

(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: I have already cited one paper about the  uncertainty of abiogenesis, there's Plenty more!

Oh, so now the scientific literature isn't a problem for you?

(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: I'm curious why you deleted half my post in your quote.

Because there is no need to quote the entire thing. I quoted only the part to which I wanted to respond. As long as the meaning isn't affected, it aids in clarity for the reader. It's not like I just dropped out of the xmas tree here.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Human Devolution
(January 21, 2017 at 9:04 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(January 21, 2017 at 9:00 am)LastPoet Wrote: What is best in life?

Having a pain free, care free day in the company of people you love.

He set you up for Conan, and you go and tell us something sensible! Are you feeling OK?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
RE: Human Devolution
(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: Dear Stimbo, I have a science degree . . . . 

What field? Are we talking post-graduate degree, bachelor's, what? And what school?
Reply
RE: Human Devolution
(January 21, 2017 at 4:36 am)Pulse Wrote: Dear Stimbo, I have a science degree [...]

Following on to Crossless's questions -- forgive me, but I simply do not believe this claim, given your obvious difficulties with some basic principles of the field, and your obvious ignorance of answers you claim to be seeking but reject on the grounds that they don't comport with your worldview. Extremely unscientific.

Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)