Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 4:30 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trump's ban on Muslims
#11
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
(February 1, 2017 at 8:31 pm)wallym Wrote:
(February 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm)abaris Wrote: Trump has business ties there. That's the one and only educated guess.

A country being a recently sanctioned genocide filled chaotic war zone likely leads to both 1) difficulty vetting people from that area 2) not an ideal location for a Trump golf course.

Seems likely you just have your causations mixed up.
We have acess to Assad's records and Syria was a police state.

Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
Reply
#12
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
Don't know if anyone has said this yet, but "the list" actually came from Obama as the countries that were most threatening.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
#13
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
(February 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm)abaris Wrote:
(February 1, 2017 at 7:36 pm)wallym Wrote: That's my intuitive guess at why people from a stable moderately friendly country would receive less intense scrutiny than one that is in chaos or an enemy.

Trump has business ties there. That's the one and only educated guess.

Summary: None of the banned countries has business ties to Trump. And none of the citizens of the banned countries launched a terrorist attack on American soil - ever.

Make of that what you will.

I wish people would stop with this "explanation". The Obama administration came up with the list of countries as "countries of concern". They are all either at war / civil war / politically unstable.

As much I dislike Trump the fact that he has no business interests in the named countries seems to be little more than coincidence.
Reply
#14
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
Let's not get carried away with a lazy narrative on this one.

The list is still stupid, but not for that reason.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#15
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
There are about 50 muslim countries in the world. Seven are on the list. It sounds like some people won't be happy until all of them are on the list.
Reply
#16
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
(February 2, 2017 at 12:15 am)Tiberius Wrote:
(February 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm)abaris Wrote: Trump has business ties there. That's the one and only educated guess.

Summary: None of the banned countries has business ties to Trump. And none of the citizens of the banned countries launched a terrorist attack on American soil - ever.

Make of that what you will.

I wish people would stop with this "explanation". The Obama administration came up with the list of countries as "countries of concern". They are all either at war / civil war / politically unstable.

As much I dislike Trump the fact that he has no business interests in the named countries seems to be little more than coincidence.

It doesn't even have to be a pure coincidence, the causality might go the opposite way - i.e. people tend to have more business interests in politically stable countries.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#17
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
It seems to me that if Trump has any sort of brain and plan, the plan is to incite more terror attacks against the USA by pissing off as many Muslims as possible. He can then "justify" a war. He's giving ISIS exactly what they need. They don't even need to lie to their recruits about this.

If. He may just be a complete and utter total moron.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#18
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
(February 2, 2017 at 12:15 am)Tiberius Wrote: I wish people would stop with this "explanation". The Obama administration came up with the list of countries as "countries of concern". They are all either at war / civil war / politically unstable.

As much I dislike Trump the fact that he has no business interests in the named countries seems to be little more than coincidence.

Sorry Tibs but this is not a case of Trump following up on Obama's work. It's clear that Trump felt/was advised to make good on his 'anti-terrorism' ban of muslims entering the country. If we examine the stats we see that there have been no attacks from within the US by migrant citizens of any of the banned nations. However all of the top ranked countries for counts of migrant terrorists are exempt from his ban. Why? If terrorist activity is not on his list of criteria for the ban, what are?

Is it not reasonable to suggest it could be a result of his well-documented personal relationships with heads of state from the countries in which he does business? Is it not reasonable to suggest that a man who has already taken great pains, on a number of occasions, to protect his business assets in spite of the conflicts of interest with his presidency, might do so once again?
Sum ergo sum
Reply
#19
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
(February 2, 2017 at 5:46 am)robvalue Wrote: It seems to me that if Trump has any sort of brain and plan, the plan is to incite more terror attacks against the USA by pissing off as many Muslims as possible. He can then "justify" a war. He's giving ISIS exactly what they need. They don't even need to lie to their recruits about this.

If. He may just be a complete and utter total moron.
I think ISIS should be more fearful of us than we should be of them.
Reply
#20
RE: Trump's ban on Muslims
(February 2, 2017 at 5:51 am)Ben Davis Wrote:
(February 2, 2017 at 12:15 am)Tiberius Wrote: I wish people would stop with this "explanation". The Obama administration came up with the list of countries as "countries of concern". They are all either at war / civil war / politically unstable.

As much I dislike Trump the fact that he has no business interests in the named countries seems to be little more than coincidence.

Sorry Tibs but this is not a case of Trump following up on Obama's work. It's clear that Trump felt/was advised to make good on his 'anti-terrorism' ban of muslims entering the country. If we examine the stats we see that there have been no attacks from within the US by migrant citizens of any of the banned nations. However all of the top ranked countries for counts of migrant terrorists are exempt from his ban. Why? If terrorist activity is not on his list of criteria for the ban, what are?

Is it not reasonable to suggest it could be a result of his well-documented personal relationships with heads of state from the countries in which he does business? Is it not reasonable to suggest that a man who has already taken great pains, on a number of occasions, to protect his business assets in spite of the conflicts of interest with his presidency, might do so once again?

I never claimed the ban was following up on Obama's work, but it is an undeniable fact that the list of countries banned was originally produced by the Obama administration: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com...index.html

Clearly it was not the intention of Obama to ban immigration from these countries, but all the same, his administration did produce the list, and Trump used the list to justify the ban.

So no, it's not reasonable to suggest he chose these countries based on his business interests. Its just not true.

Now, when he starts banning immigration from more countries that weren't identified by the Obama administration, we'll see whether he chooses them based on any business related factors, but for now, as I said, it seems to be coincidence.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What explains Macron’s obsession with Islam and Muslims? WinterHold 17 1258 October 27, 2020 at 12:48 pm
Last Post: Deesse23
  Are more Trump signs indicative of Trump winning? Dingo 15 1002 October 1, 2020 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Trump VS Trump (not exactly political news but I have no idea where to post this) Cepheus Ace 0 36852 February 12, 2019 at 2:15 am
Last Post: Cepheus Ace
  transgender military ban to go into effect Fake Messiah 20 2503 January 25, 2019 at 12:28 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Are Muslims the real threat? stupid rightist propaganda WinterHold 73 16163 November 1, 2017 at 9:09 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Will Muslims love Trump? They are whiny little bitches just like him. Greatest I am 1 916 September 7, 2017 at 2:53 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  I'm awfully confused: how do Trump supporters relate to Trump NuclearEnergy 11 3114 March 7, 2017 at 4:24 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Pence Defends Trump’s Criticism of Judge Who Blocked Travel Ban Foxaèr 3 823 February 5, 2017 at 9:41 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Do you think Muslims will dominate the world again like they used before? Defender 79 15433 January 3, 2017 at 4:24 am
Last Post: account_inactive
  Is Trump's election bad for Trump's businesses? Jehanne 22 4044 November 15, 2016 at 1:03 am
Last Post: CWoods



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)